首页|期刊导航|中国临床药理学杂志|替雷利珠单抗联合PC方案治疗晚期非鳞非小细胞肺癌患者的临床研究

替雷利珠单抗联合PC方案治疗晚期非鳞非小细胞肺癌患者的临床研究OA

Clinical trial of tislelizumab combined with PC regimen in the treatment of advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer patients

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 探讨替雷利珠单抗注射液联合注射用培美曲塞二钠与铂类(注射用卡铂或注射用顺铂)(PC)治疗晚期非鳞非小细胞肺癌(nsq-NSCLC)患者的临床疗效与安全性.方法 将nsq-NSCLC患者根据治疗方案分为对照组和试验组.对照组于第1 d静脉滴注注射用培美曲塞二钠500 mg·m-2和铂类治疗,注射用卡铂按照药时曲线下面积为5,注射用顺铂按照75 mg·m-2剂量给药,21 d为一个周期,试验组加用替雷利珠单抗注射液200 mg,于第1 d静脉输注,每次输注时间为30~60 min,21 d为一个周期.2组均连续治疗4个周期.比较2组患者临床疗效、免疫功能指标、肿瘤相关标志物、生活质量,并进行安全性评价.结果 共纳入92例患者,其中对照组44例,试验组48例.治疗后,试验组与对照组患者客观缓解率(ORR)分别为68.75%(33例/48例)和47.73%(21例/44例),疾病控制率(DCR)分别为85.42%(41例/48例)和65.91%(29例/44例);外周血簇分化抗原(CD3+)分别为(34.29±5.49)%和(31.37±5.37)%,CD4+/CD8+比值分别为(1.09±0.31)和(0.92±0.18),癌胚抗原(CEA)分别为(24.68±6.28)和(28.46±6.57)ng·mL-1,胸苷激酶 1(TK-1)水平分别为(1.58±0.32)和(1.79±0.35)pmol·L-1,基质金属蛋白酶-9(MMP-9)水平分别为(27.14±5.47)和(31.06±7.24)ng·mL-1,血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)水平分别为(321.53±62.15)和(355.76±68.19)ng·L-1,碱性成纤维细胞生长因子(bFGF)水平分别为(15.72±2.94)和(17.38±3.12)pg.mL-1.中位随访33个月,试验组与对照组中位无进展生存期(PFS)分别为15.0和10.0个月,中位总生存期(OS)分别为27.0和17.0个月.上述指标,2组间比较在统计上差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05,P<0.01).试验组共发生27例药物不良反应(56.25%),分别是皮疹3例、甲状腺功能减退3例、肝功能异常3例、肾功能异常2例、乏力4例、贫血2例、骨髓抑制6例、胃肠道反应4例;对照组共发生20例药物不良反应(45.45%),分别是皮疹1例、甲状腺功能减退2例、肝功能异常3例、肾功能异常3例、乏力2例、贫血2例、骨髓抑制5例、胃肠道反应2例;药物不良反应总发生率组间比较,在统计学上差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 与单纯PC方案相比,替雷利珠单抗联合PC方案在真实世界中与更高的ORR和DCR相关,并在免疫功能及生活质量指标方面显示出一定优势,且未观察到明显增加的总体药物不良反应风险.该联合方案为晚期nsq-NSCLC患者提供了一种有效且耐受性良好的治疗选择.

Objective To assess the clinical outcomes and safety of tislelizumab injection combined with pemetrexed disodium for injection and platinum chemotherapy(carboplatin for injection or cisplatin for injection)(PC)in advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer(nsq-NSCLC)patients.Methods Patients with advanced nsq-NSCLC were divided into the control group and the treatment group according to the treatment plan.The control group was treated with intravenous infusion of pemetrexed for injection 500 mg·m-2 and platinum-based therapy on the first day,carboplatin for injection was administered at a dose of 5 under the curve at the time of administration,cisplatin for injection was given at a dose of 75 mg·m-2,with 21 days as one cycle and the treatment group.On the basis of the control group,treatment group was intravenously infused 200 mg of tislelizumab injection on the first day;each infusion lasted for 30 to 60 minutes,and 21 days was one cycle.Two group were treated for 4 cycles.The clinical efficacy,immune function indicators,tumor-related markers,quality of life and safety of the two groups of patients were compared.Results A total of 92 patients were enrolled,with 44 cases in control group and 48 cases in treatment group.After treatment,the objective response rate(ORR)in the treatment group and the control group were 68.75%(33 cases/48 cases)and 47.73%(21 cases/44 cases),respectively;the disease control rate(DCR)were 85.42%(41 cases/48 cases)and 65.91%(29 cases/44 cases),respectively.The cluster of differentiation(CD)3+levels were(34.29±5.49)%and(31.37±5.37)%,respectively;the CD4+/CD8+ratios were(1.09±0.31)and(0.92±0.18),respectively;the serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA)were(24.68±6.28)and(28.46±6.57)ng·mL-1,respectively;the levels of thymidine kinase 1(TK-1)were(1.58±0.32)and(1.79±0.35)pmol·L-1,respectively;the levels of matrix metalloproteinase-9(MMP-9)were(27.14±5.47)and(31.06±7.24)ng·mL-1,respectively;the levels of vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF)were(321.53±62.15)and(355.76±68.19)ng·L-1,respectively;the levels of basic fibroblast growth factor(bFGF)were(15.72±2.94)and(17.38±3.12)pg·mL-1,respectively.Median follow-up 33 months,median progress free survival(PFS)was 15.0 and 10.0 months and median overall survival(OS)27.0 and 17.0 months.Statistically significant difference was found for all of the above indicators when comparing the two groups(P<0.05,P<0.01).A total of 27 adverse reactions occurred in the treatment group(56.25%),including 3 cases of rash,3 cases of hypothyroidism,3 cases of abnormal liver function,2 cases of abnormal renal function,4 cases of fatigue,2 cases of anemia,6 cases of myelosuppression,and 4 cases of gastrointestinal reactions.A total of 20 adverse reactions occurred in the control group(45.45%),including 1 case of rash,2 cases of hypothyroidism,3 cases of abnormal liver function,3 cases of abnormal renal function,2 cases of fatigue,2 cases of anemia,5 cases of myelosuppression,and 2 cases of gastrointestinal reactions.There was no statistically significant difference in the overall incidence of adverse durg reactions between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Compared with the PC regimen alone,the tislelizumab injection combined with PC regimen was associated with higher ORR and DCR in the real world,and showed certain advantages in immune function and quality of life indicators,and no significant increase in the overall risk of adverse drug reactions was observed.This combination regimen offers an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for patients with advanced nsq-NSCLC.

林洁桓;马骏;王宏进;陈福楠

福建省龙岩市第一医院胸外科,福建龙岩 364000福建省龙岩市第一医院胸外科,福建龙岩 364000福建省龙岩市第一医院胸外科,福建龙岩 364000福建省龙岩市第一医院胸外科,福建龙岩 364000

医药卫生

替雷利珠单抗注射液注射用培美曲塞二钠注射用顺铂注射用卡铂免疫治疗晚期非鳞型非小细胞肺癌

tislelizumab injectionpemetrexed disodium for injectioncisplatin for injectioncarboplatin for injectionimmunotherapyadvanced non-squamous non-small cell lung carcinoma

《中国临床药理学杂志》 2026 (12)

1665-1672,8

福建省自然科学基金资助项目(2025J011683)

10.13699/j.cnki.1001-6821.2026.12.003

评论