首页|期刊导航|武警医学|氟替美维吸入粉雾剂及布地格福吸入气雾剂对重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的疗效

氟替美维吸入粉雾剂及布地格福吸入气雾剂对重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的疗效OA

Clinical efficacy of two single inhalers combined with three therapeutic drugs in treating patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 基于症状评分和健康状态比较氟替美维吸入粉雾剂及布地格福吸入气雾剂治疗重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的临床疗效.方法 回顾性选择重度 COPD 的患者66 例,分为氟替卡松/乌美溴铵/维兰特罗(FF/UMEC/VI)组和布地奈德/格隆溴铵/福莫特罗(BUD/GLY/FOR)组.比较两组患者在单一吸入器三联治疗(SITT)药物 1 个月时的症状评分和健康状态并回顾性分析 FF/UMEC/VI 组短期及长期使用的症状变化.结果 纳入 35 例 FF/UMEC/VI 组和 31 例 BUD/GLY/FOR 组患者.与治疗前比较,两种 SITT 药物 COPD 评估测试(CAT)评分、改良版英国医学研究委员会(mMRC)呼吸困难评分和6 min 步行试验(6 MWT)数值在治疗1 个月时均有改善,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).与BUD/GLY/FOR 组相比,FF/UMEC/VI 组治疗 1 个月时 mMRC 评分(U=-2.277,P<0.05)和 6 MWT 数值(U=-3.993,P<0.05)较基线改善更多,差异有统计学意义.FF/UMEC/VI 组维持治疗 8 个月比 3 个月时症状评分和健康状态改善更大,但差异无统计学意义.结论 治疗 1 个月时氟替美维吸入粉雾剂在改善重度 COPD 患者症状评分和健康状态方面优于布地格福吸入气雾剂.

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of fluticasone/umeclidinium/vilanterol(FF/UMEC/VI)inhalation powder and budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol(BUD/GLY/FOR)inhalation aerosol in the treatment of severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD)based on symptom scores and health status.Methods A total of 66 patients with severe COPD were retro-spectively selected and divided into a FF/UMEC/VI group and a BUD/GLY/FOR group.The health status and symptom scores of the two groups were compared at 1 month of single inhaler triple therapy(SITT)drug use,and the short-term and long-term symptom changes of the FF/UMEC/VI group were retrospectively analyzed.Results The FF/UMEC/VI group had 35 patients,and the BUD/GLY/FOR group had 31 patients.Compared with before treatment,there was significant improvement in COPD assessment test(CAT)score,mMRC score,and 6MWT at 1 month of treatment in both groups,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Compared with the BUD/GLY/FOR group,the mMRC score(U=-2.277,P<0.05)and 6MWT(U=-3.993,P<0.05)of the FF/UMEC/VI group improved at 1 month of treatment,with statistically significant differences.In the FF/UMEC/VI group,the symptom score and health status improved more at 8 months of maintenance treatment than at 3 months,but the difference was not statistically significant.Conclusions At 1 month of treatment,FF/UMEC/VI inhalation powder is superior to BUD/GLY/FOR inhalation aerosol in improving the symptom scores and health status of the patients with severe COPD.

朱予津;苗慧;乔治;陈一冰;韩国敬

300162,武警天津总队医院内二科||100853 北京,解放军总医院第一医学中心呼吸与重症医学科100039 北京,解放军总医院第三医学中心急诊科300162,武警天津总队医院康复医学与理疗科100853 北京,解放军总医院第一医学中心呼吸与重症医学科100853 北京,解放军总医院第一医学中心呼吸与重症医学科

医药卫生

氟替美维布地格福CAT 评分改良版英国医学研究委员会呼吸困难评分6 min 步行试验

FF/UMEC/VIBUD/GLY/FORCAT scoremMRC score6MWT

《武警医学》 2026 (7)

569-574,6

10.3969/j.issn.1004-3594.2026.07.004

评论