祁连山南麓不同植被类型土壤生态化学计量特征与碳储量OA
Soil ecological stoichiometry and carbon storage under different vegetation types in southern foothills of Qilian Mountains
[目的]探讨祁连山南麓不同植被类型下土壤养分及有机碳储量的差异特征,揭示土壤生态化学计量特征对土壤有机碳储量(SOCS)的作用机制,为区域植被恢复与碳汇功能评估提供科学依据.[方法]以祁连山南麓灌木林、白桦阔叶林、白桦—云杉针阔混交林和云杉针叶林为研究对象,开展其土壤有机碳(C)、全氮(N)和全磷(P)及其化学计量比与土壤有机碳储量关系的研究.[结果]祁连山南麓不同植被类型土壤C,N,P含量差异显著(p<0.05),其中混交林土壤C和N含量最高,灌木林土壤P含量最高.土壤C/N在不同植被类型间差异不显著(p>0.05),土壤C/P和N/P受植被类型影响较大,均表现为白桦阔叶林>针阔混交林>灌木林>云杉针叶林.微生物多样性对植被类型的响应各异,表现为灌木林具有最高细菌多样性,阔叶林利于真菌多样性,而针叶林整体微生物多样性最低.SOCS在不同植被类型间差异显著(p<0.05),依次为针阔混交林>白桦阔叶林>灌木林>云杉针叶林.SOCS的主导因子在不同植被类型间存在差异:在灌木林中,地上凋落物(PL)是调节SOCS变化的关键因子,而在白桦阔叶林、针阔混交林和云杉针叶林中则主要受N含量及N/P调控.[结论]祁连山南麓不同植被类型通过改变土壤养分状况及C/N/P平衡格局,显著影响土壤有机碳的固存过程.SOCS不仅依赖于碳输入量,更受化学计量特征的调控.本研究为该区域植被恢复过程中的碳汇潜力评估和养分管理优化提供了理论支撑.
[Objective]This study aims to investigate the differences in soil nutrients and soil organic carbon storage(SOCS)under different vegetation types on the southern foothills of the Qilian Mountains,and to reveal the mechanisms by which soil ecological stoichiometric characteristics affect SOCS.This work provides a scientific basis for regional vegetation restoration and carbon sink function assessment.[Methods]Shrublands,Betula platyphylla broadleaf forests,Betula platyphylla-Picea crassifolia mixed coniferous-broadleaf forests,and Picea-crassifolia coniferous forests on the southern foothills of the Qilian Mountains were selected as study objects.The relationships of soil organic carbon(C),total nitrogen(N),total phosphorus(P),and their stoichiometric ratios with SOCS were examined.[Results]Soil C,N,and P contents differed significantly(p<0.05)among different vegetation types on the southern foothills of the Qilian Mountains,with the mixed forest exhibiting the highest soil C and N contents,and shrublands showing the highest soil P content.Soil C/N did not differ significantly(p>0.05)among vegetation types,whereas soil C/P and N/P were strongly affected by vegetation type,following the order:Betula platyphylla broadleaf forest>mixed coniferous-broadleaf forest>shrubland>Picea crassifolia coniferous forest.SOCS also differed significantly among vegetation types(p<0.05)and decreased in the order:mixed coniferous-broadleaf forest>Betula platyphylla broadleaf forest>shrubland>Picea crassifolia coniferous forest.Microbial diversity responded differently to vegetation types.Shrublands exhibited the highest bacterial diversity,Betula platyphylla forests favored fungal diversity,while Picea crassifolia forests had the lowest overall microbial diversity.The dominant factors controlling SOCS varied among vegetation types.In shrublands,aboveground plant litter(PL)was the key factor regulating SOCS variations,whereas in Betula platyphylla broadleaf forests,mixed coniferous-broadleaf forests,and Picea crassifolia coniferous forests,SOCS was primarily regulated by N content and the N/P ratio.[Conclusion]Different vegetation types on the southern foothills of the Qilian Mountains significantly affect the soil organic carbon sequestration process by altering soil nutrient status and the C/N/P balance pattern.SOCS depends not only on carbon input but also on stoichiometric regulation.This study provides theoretical support for assessing carbon sink potential and optimizing nutrient management during vegetation restoration in this region.
马占明;李润杰;杨晓璇;辛继林;王改妮;赵家艺;党怡乐;冯丁;张永坤
青海大学 农牧学院,西宁 810016||青海大学省部共建三江源生态与高原农牧业国家重点实验室,西宁 810016青海大学省部共建三江源生态与高原农牧业国家重点实验室,西宁 810016青海大学 农牧学院,西宁 810016||青海大学省部共建三江源生态与高原农牧业国家重点实验室,西宁 810016青海大学 农牧学院,西宁 810016||青海大学省部共建三江源生态与高原农牧业国家重点实验室,西宁 810016青海大学省部共建三江源生态与高原农牧业国家重点实验室,西宁 810016青海大学省部共建三江源生态与高原农牧业国家重点实验室,西宁 810016||青海大学 生态环境工程学院,西宁 810016青海大学 农牧学院,西宁 810016||青海大学省部共建三江源生态与高原农牧业国家重点实验室,西宁 810016青海大学省部共建三江源生态与高原农牧业国家重点实验室,西宁 810016||青海大学 生态环境工程学院,西宁 810016青海大学省部共建三江源生态与高原农牧业国家重点实验室,西宁 810016
农业科技
植被类型生态化学计量特征碳储量祁连山南麓
vegetation typeecological stoichiometry characteristicscarbon storagesouthern foothills of Qilian Mountains
《水土保持研究》 2026 (5)
95-104,112,11
国家自然科学基金项目"高寒草甸退化与恢复过程残体碳对土壤有机碳库的调控机理"(42567043)
评论