不同雨型下水土保持措施对皖南山区板栗林坡面水土流失的影响OA
Impact of soil and water conservation measures on soil erosion from chestnut forest slopes under different rainfall patterns in southern Anhui mountainous area
[目的]探索皖南山区板栗林不同雨型下水土保持措施对水土流失的影响规律,为研究区水土流失防治提供科学依据.[方法]以山区板栗林坡面径流小区为研究单元,基于2024-2025年天然降雨观测数据,应用K-means聚类分析、方差分析等方法,针对植物篱、乔灌混交、植物篱+截排水沟、截排水沟、乔灌混交+截排水沟5种不同水土保持措施配置以及1个对照,分析不同雨型对坡面径流泥沙的影响.[结果](1)研究区降雨可划分为5种类型,Ⅰ雨型(短历时、中雨量、大雨强型降雨)、Ⅱ雨型(长历时、中雨量、小雨强型降雨)、Ⅲ雨型(中历时、小雨量、小雨强型降雨)、Ⅳ雨型(中历时、大雨量、大雨强型降雨)和Ⅴ雨型(长历时、大雨量、中雨强型降雨).其中发生频次较高的是Ⅱ雨型和Ⅲ雨型,是研究区主要侵蚀性降雨类型.(2)不同水土保持措施的减流减沙效益不同,在侵蚀性降雨条件下,相较于对照小区,植物措施结合工程措施的减流减沙综合效益高于单一措施效益;单一措施中,截排水沟截水效益较好,有效减少32.6%地表径流,植物篱和乔灌混交减沙效益最好,分别减少52.3%和52.2%泥沙.(3)大多数径流小区产流量和产沙量均与降雨量和最大30 min雨强呈显著正相关,与降雨历时相关性较差.[结论]降雨量和最大30 min雨强是影响该区域不同水保措施坡面产流产沙的关键指标;皖南山区板栗林坡面上植物措施结合工程措施的配置方式减流减沙效果最优,建议在侵蚀高发期布设乔灌混交+截排水沟综合防治措施.板栗林坡面不同水土保持措施中,植物措施和工程措施相结合的配置模式是减少坡面水土流失的有效手段,可以有效减少多种雨型下的水土流失.因此要因地制宜、合理布设水土保持措施,达到水土保持效益的最大化.
[Objective]This study explores the impact patterns of soil and water conservation measures on soil and water loss from chestnut forest slopes under different rainfall types in southern Anhui mountainous areas,providing a scientific basis for erosion control in the study region.[Methods]Runoff plots on chestnut forest slopes in mountainous areas were used as research units.Based on natural rainfall observation data from 2024 to 2025,K-means clustering analysis and analysis of variance were applied to classify rainfall patterns and evaluate their effects on runoff and sediment yield under five different soil and water conservation measure configurations—vegetative hedgerows,arbor-shrub intercropping,vegetative hedgerows+interception and drainage ditches,interception and drainage ditches,and arbor-shrub intercropping+interception and drainage ditches—along with one control.[Results](1)Rainfall in the study area could be classified into five types:Type Ⅰ(short duration,moderate rainfall amount,and high intensity),Type Ⅱ(long duration,moderate rainfall amount,and low intensity),Type Ⅲ(medium duration,light rainfall amount,and low intensity),Type Ⅳ(medium duration,heavy rainfall amount,and high intensity),and Type Ⅴ(long duration,heavy rainfall amount,and moderate intensity).Among these,Type Ⅱ and Type Ⅲ occurred most frequently and represented the main erosive rainfall types in the study area.(2)Different soil and water conservation measures exhibited varying efficiencies in reducing runoff and sediment.Under erosive rainfall conditions,compared to the control plot,combined vegetative and engineering measures outperformed single measures in reducing runoff and sediment loss.Among single measures,interception and drainage ditches demonstrated superior water interception efficiency,effectively reducing surface runoff by 32.6%,while vegetative hedgerows and arbor-shrub intercropping showed the best sediment reduction efficiency,decreasing sediment yield by 52.3%and 52.2%,respectively.(3)In most runoff plots,runoff and sediment yield were significantly positively correlated with rainfall amount and maximum 30-minute rainfall intensity,but showed poor correlation with rainfall duration.[Conclusion]Rainfall amount and maximum 30-minute rainfall intensity are key indicators affecting slope runoff and sediment yield under different soil and water conservation measures in this region.The combination of vegetative and engineering measures achieves the optimal effect in reducing runoff and sediment loss on chestnut forest slopes in southern Anhui mountainous area.The comprehensive measure combining arbor-shrub intercropping with interception and drainage ditches is recommended during periods of high erosion risk.Among different soil and water conservation measures on chestnut forest slopes,the combined configuration of vegetative and engineering measures represents an effective approach for reducing slope soil and water loss,effectively mitigating erosion under various rainfall types.Therefore,soil and water conservation measures should be arranged reasonably according to local conditions to maximize their benefits.
曲雪铭;王凌昕;强淏嵩;邸明婷;夏小林;刘旦旦;张琼;郭珍;刘刚
西北农林科技大学 水土保持科学与工程学院(水土保持研究所)水土保持与荒漠化整治全国重点实验室,陕西 杨凌 712100西北农林科技大学 水土保持科学与工程学院(水土保持研究所)水土保持与荒漠化整治全国重点实验室,陕西 杨凌 712100西北农林科技大学 水土保持科学与工程学院(水土保持研究所)水土保持与荒漠化整治全国重点实验室,陕西 杨凌 712100西北农林科技大学 水土保持科学与工程学院(水土保持研究所)水土保持与荒漠化整治全国重点实验室,陕西 杨凌 712100安徽省水科学与智慧水利重点实验室,合肥 230088安徽省水科学与智慧水利重点实验室,合肥 230088西北农林科技大学 水土保持科学与工程学院(水土保持研究所)水土保持与荒漠化整治全国重点实验室,陕西 杨凌 712100||中国科学院 水利部 水土保持研究所,陕西 杨凌 712100四川华标测检测技术有限公司,成都 610097西北农林科技大学 水土保持科学与工程学院(水土保持研究所)水土保持与荒漠化整治全国重点实验室,陕西 杨凌 712100||中国科学院 水利部 水土保持研究所,陕西 杨凌 712100
农业科技
板栗林水土保持措施产流产沙雨型土壤侵蚀
chestnut forestssoil and water conservation measuresrunoff and sediment yieldrainfall typesoil erosion
《水土保持研究》 2026 (5)
11-21,31,12
安徽省自然科学基金水科学联合资助项目(2308085US14)水利水资源安徽省重点实验室开放研究资助项目(2023SKJ03)
评论