首页|期刊导航|人民长江|基于机理-深度学习耦合模型的流域洪水预报研究

基于机理-深度学习耦合模型的流域洪水预报研究OA

Watershed flood forecasting based on mechanism-deep learning coupled models

中文摘要英文摘要

流域洪水预报对防汛抢险和水资源管理具有重要意义.为探究机理-深度学习耦合模型在流域洪水预报中的应用,以浙江东苕溪上游流域为研究对象,构建了新安江模型(XAJ)、2 种深度学习模型(LSTM、CNN-LSTM)和6 种机理-深度学习耦合模型(PIML1/2/3-LSTM,PIML1/2/3-CNN-LSTM),系统探讨了 9 种模型在洪水预报中的应用效果.结果表明:① XAJ 模型整体稳定性较高,验证集平均纳什效率系数(NSE)为0.87,但对高流量段存在系统性低估,洪水总量相对误差(RE)和洪峰流量相对误差(REP)指标绝对值均大于15%.② 深度学习模型LSTM、CNN-LSTM 在高流量段表现优于XAJ 模型,但NSE 略低,相对XAJ 模型分别下降了5.7%和10.3%.③ 耦合模型中,仅引入 XAJ 输出流量(QXAJ)的 PIML1 型模型精度最优,其中,PIML1-LSTM 模型的RE 和REP 指标相对XAJ 模型降低了71.9%和33.2%;而引入土壤含水量(QSWV)的PIML2 型模型性能显著下降,表明物理模型中部分中间变量的传递可能会抑制机器学习效果.④ 耦合模型通过牺牲少量整体拟合度,换取了关键洪水特征指标的显著提升,建议实际应用时优先采用 PIML1 型架构,可在保持物理可解释性的同时优化预报精度.研究成果可为优化水文物理-数据驱动耦合建模提供理论依据.

Watershed flood forecasting is of great significance for flood control,emergency response,and water resources man-agement.To investigate the application of mechanism-deep learning coupled models in watershed flood forecasting,this study takes the upper reach of the Dongtiaoxi River Basin as the research object,construct the Xin'anjiang(XAJ)model,two deep learning models(LSTM and CNN-LSTM),and six mechanism-deep learning coupled models(PIML1/2/3-LSTM and PIML1/2/3-CNN-LSTM),and systematically evaluate the forecasting performance of these nine models for flood simulation.The results indicate that:① The XAJ model exhibits favorable overall stability,with an average Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coeffi-cient(NSE)of 0.87 on the validation set.However,it shows systematic underestimation during high-flow periods,with absolute values of the relative error of total flood volume(RE)and the relative error of peak discharge(REP)both exceeding 15%.②Deep learning models(LSTM and CNN-LSTM)outperform the XAJ model during high-flow periods but yield slightly lower NSE values,decreasing by 5.7%and 10.3%compared with the XAJ model,respectively.③ Among the coupled models,the PIML1 type model that only incorporates the XAJ output discharge(QXAJ)achieves the best accuracy.Specifically,the RE and REP of the PIML1-LSTM model improve by 71.9%and 33.2%compared with the XAJ model.In contrast,the PIML2 type,which introduces soil moisture content(QSWV),shows a significant decline in performance,indicating that transferring certain in-termediate variables from physical models may inhibit the effectiveness of machine learning.④ The coupled models achieve signif-icant improvements in key flood characteristic indices at the cost of a slight reduction in overall fitting degree.It is recommended to prioritize the PIML1 architecture in practical applications,as it optimizes forecasting accuracy while maintaining physical inter-pretability.These findings provide a theoretical basis for optimizing the coupling of physical and data-driven hydrological mod-els.

张野;王磊之;苏鑫;李伶杰;胡鉴闻

南京水利科学研究院 水灾害防御全国重点实验室,江苏 南京 210029南京水利科学研究院 水灾害防御全国重点实验室,江苏 南京 210029南京水利科学研究院 水灾害防御全国重点实验室,江苏 南京 210029南京水利科学研究院 水灾害防御全国重点实验室,江苏 南京 210029南京水利科学研究院 水灾害防御全国重点实验室,江苏 南京 210029

天文与地球科学

洪水预报新安江模型深度学习模型物理引导机器学习东苕溪流域

flood forecastingXin'anjiang modeldeep learning modelphysics-informed machine learningDongtiaoxi Riv-er Basin

《人民长江》 2026 (7)

1-8,8

国家自然科学基金项目(52239008,52239008,52309026)江苏省水利科技项目(202311)中国电建集团揭榜挂帅项目(E001Y240006)水利干部教育与人才培养项目(So525001)

10.16232/j.cnki.1001-4179.2026.07.001

评论