加拿大贺维学会成果质量控制机制研究及启示OACHSSCD
Study on the Achievement Quality Control Mechanism of the C.D.Howe Institute
成果质量是新型智库发展的重要指标.采用网络调研与文献调研方法,通过细致阅读年度审计报告、梳理研究成果,对加拿大贺维学会(C.D.Howe Institute)成果质量控制的主要措施进行分析.研究显示,贺维学会形成了"独立研究—循证决策—同行评议"三位一体的成果质量控制机制.在这一机制下,贺维学会将成果控制统一于智库研究与智库管理中,以独立研究确保了成果的客观性,以循证决策确保了成果的可靠性,以严格的同行评议确保了成果的专业性.中国新型智库应构建管理与研究并重、专业与优势相结合的选题机制,完善同行评议与智库成果控制机制,提升成果质量,为科学民主依法决策提供智力支撑.
The quality of achievement is an important indicator for the high-quality development of new think tanks.Through online research and literature research,carefully reading the annual report and research results,this study analyzes the main measures of quality control at the C.D.Howe Institute and summarizes its main characteristics.The research shows that C.D.Howe Institute has formed a trinity of"independent,evidence-based,peer review".Under this mechanism,the C.D.Howe Institute integrates quality control into its research and mechanism processes It ensures objectivity through independent topic selection,reliability through evidence-based research,and professionalism through rigorous peer review.New think tanks can enhance the quality of research by emphasizing both management and research,integrating professionalism and expertise,and enhancing control mechanism for think tank outcomes through peer review.
周京艳;刘如
北京市科学技术研究院,北京 100044中国科学技术发展战略研究院,北京 100038
社会科学
贺维学会智库成果质量控制新型智库
C.D.Howe InstituteThink Tank AchievementQuality ControlNew Think Tank
《全球科技经济瞭望》 2026 (3)
68-76,9
北京市社会科学基金"青年学术带头人"项目"基于政治系统论的新型智库能力体系构建研究"(24DTR037).
评论