种植单冠修复体固位方式对老年患者邻接关系及种植体周围疾病的影响OA
Effect of retention methods of implant single-crown restoration on proximal contact and peri-implant diseases in elderly patients
目的:探讨种植单冠修复体固位方式对老年患者邻接关系及种植体周围疾病的影响.方法:选取我院2022 年 7 月~2024 年 9 月收治的行种植修复的老年患者 108 例,以数字表法随机分为 A 组(n=54,螺丝固位修复)、B 组(n=54,粘接固位修复).比较两组邻接状况、美学效果、植体周围牙周健康相关指标、种植体周围疾病情况及患者满意度.结果:修复后即刻,两组邻接关系合格率均为 100%.修复后 6 个月,两组邻接关系合格率比较无统计学差异(P>0.05);修复后 12 个月,A 组邻接关系合格率高于 B 组(χ2=4.696,P<0.05);两组红色美学指数(PES)、白色美学指数(WES)评分在修复后即刻、修复后 12 个月比较均无统计学差异(P>0.05);修复后即刻,两组探诊深度(PD)、改良出血指数(mSBI)评分、菌斑指数(mPLI)评分比较均无统计学差异(P>0.05).修复后 6、12 个月,A 组PD、mSBI 评分、mPLI 评分均低于 B 组(P<0.05);A 组种植体周围疾病总发生率低于 B 组(χ2=3.967,P<0.05);两组患者的舒适度、语言功能、美观程度满意度比较均无统计学差异(P>0.05);A 组患者的咀嚼功能满意度评分高于B 组(P<0.05).结论:与粘接固位相比,种植单冠采用螺丝固位能更好地维持邻接关系的稳定性,有利于种植体周围组织的长期健康,降低生物学并发症发生率,患者满意度更高.
Objective:To investigate the effect of implant single-crown restoration on proximal contact and peri-im-plant diseases in elderly patients.Methods:A total of 108 elderly patients who received implant prostheses in our hospital from July 2022 to September 2024 were selected and randomly divided into group A(n=54,screw-retained prostheses)and group B(n=54,cement-retained prostheses)using a random number table method.The proximal contact status,esthetic out-comes,peri-implant periodontal health-related indicators,peri-implant diseases,and patient satisfaction were compared be-tween the two groups.Results:Immediately after restoration,the qualification rate of proximal contact was 100%in both groups.At 6 months after restoration,there was no significant difference in the qualification rate of proximal contact between the two groups(P>0.05).At 12 months after restoration,the qualification rate of proximal contact in group A was higher(χ2=4.696,P<0.05).No significant differences were observed in pink esthetic score(PES)and white esthetic score(WES)between the two groups immediately after restoration and at 12 months after restoration(P>0.05).Immediately after restora-tion,there were no significant differences in probing depth(PD),modified sulcus bleeding index(mSBI)scores and modified plaque index(mPLI)scores between the two groups(P>0.05).At 6 and 12 months after restoration,the PD,mSBI and mPLI scores in group A were lower(P<0.05).The total incidence of peri-implant diseases in group A was lower(χ2=3.967,P<0.05).No significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding patient satisfaction with comfort,language function,and aesthetics(P>0.05).The satisfaction score for masticatory function in group A was higher(P<0.05).Conclu-sion:Compared with cement retention,screw retention for implant-supported single crowns can better maintain the stability of proximal contact,promote the long-term health of peri-implant tissues,reduce the incidence of biological complications,and a-chieve higher patient satisfaction.
许乃文;牛家慧;李国杰;曹金峰;芦一帆
石家庄市第二医院口腔科 河北 石家庄 050000石家庄市第二医院口腔科 河北 石家庄 050000河北医科大学第二医院口腔修复科 河北 石家庄 050000石家庄聪源医疗服务有限公司裕华口腔诊所 河北 石家庄 050000石家庄市第三医院口腔科 河北 石家庄 050011
医药卫生
口腔种植老年人单冠修复固位方式邻接状况种植体周围疾病
Dental implantationElderlySingle-crown restorationRetention methodsProximal contact statusPeri-implant diseases
《临床口腔医学杂志》 2026 (7)
404-408,5
河北省2023年度医学科学研究课题(20230511)
评论