首页|期刊导航|菌物学报|广叶绣球菌种质资源的综合评价:基于分子鉴定与表型多元统计分析

广叶绣球菌种质资源的综合评价:基于分子鉴定与表型多元统计分析OA

Comprehensive evaluation of germplasm resources of Sparassis latifolia based on molecular identification and multivariate statistical analysis of phenotypes

中文摘要英文摘要

本研究对 15 株广叶绣球菌(包括 10 株栽培菌株和 5 株野生菌株)进行系统研究,采用 ITS序列进行分子鉴定以确认物种身份与遗传背景,并通过测定菌丝体生长表型与子实体农艺性状,使用方差分析、主成分分析和系统聚类分析等方法挖掘数据与综合评价.ITS序列分析确定15个供试菌株均为广叶绣球菌.表型性状分析结果表明,不同菌株在菌丝体生长表型和子实体农艺性状上存在显著差异.栽培菌株在子实体重量、生物学转化率、韧性和栽培周期等方面整体优于野生菌株,其中菌株Sl-1的子实体重量最高[(321.07±29.18)g],菌株Sl-5的母种菌丝生长速度最快[(1.13±0.04)mm/d],且栽培菌株子实体瓣片多为奶白色(2A2),韧性中等或较好,栽培周期为 103-125 d.野生菌株产量普遍较低,子实体瓣片颜色偏黄,韧性一般或脆质,栽培周期为 108-132 d,但菌株 Sl-12 表现突出,其产量接近于优良栽培菌株水平且稳定性最高(变异系数为 4.44%).主成分分析提取的前 3 个主成分累计贡献率达82.47%,明确了不同菌株不同性状指标的主要特征与关联性.聚类分析将15个菌株分为 3 类,第 1 类群均为栽培菌株且优质高产,第 2 类群包括 4 个产量略低的栽培菌株和 1 个野生菌株,第 3 类群是菌株 Sl-12 为代表的野生菌株.本研究为广叶绣球菌种质创新、品种改良及产业化发展提供了科学的理论依据和数据支撑.

Fifteen strains of Sparassis latifolia(10 cultivated strains and 5 wild strains)were systematically investigated.Species identity and genetic background were confirmed through molecular identification based on internal transcribed spacer(ITS)sequence analysis.Mycelial growth phenotypes and fruiting body agronomic traits of each strain were quantitatively determined.A multi-method approach including variance analysis,principal component analysis and systematic clustering analysis was employed to conduct in-depth data mining and comprehensive evaluation of the experimental results.ITS sequencing confirmed that all tested 15 strains belonged to S.latifolia.The phenotypic trait analysis revealed significant inter-strain variations in mycelial growth phenotypes and fruiting body agronomic traits.Overall,cultivated strains outperformed wild strains in fruiting body weight,biological conversion efficiency,toughness of basidiocarps,and cultivation cycle duration.Specifically,strain Sl-1 exhibited the highest basidiocarp weight[(321.07±29.18)g],while strain Sl-5 showed the fastest mycelial growth rate of the spawn[(1.13±0.04)mm/d].The basidiocarps of most cultivated strains were milky white(2A2)with moderate to good toughness,and their cultivation cycle ranged from 103 to 125 days.In contrast with cultivated strains,wild strains typically had lower yields,with yellowish basidiocarp flesh,moderate to brittle toughness,and a cultivation cycle of 108 to 132 days.A notable exception was the wild strain Sl-12,which yielded well and the yield was comparable to that of high-performing cultivated strains and displayed the highest stability(coefficient of variation=4.44%).Principal component analysis showed that accumulative contributor ration of the first three principal components was 82.47%,highlighting the main characteristic patterns and trait associations among strains.Cluster analysis categorized the 15 strains into three distinct groups:group 1 consisted entirely of cultivated strains characterized by high quality and high yield;group 2 included four cultivated strains with moderately lower yields and one wild strain;group 3 consisted of the remaining wild strains represented by Sl-12.This study provides theoretical foundation and empirical data for germplasm innovation,cultivar improvement,and industrial development of S.latifolia.

马云蕊;罗祥英;杨爱霞;马丽婷;周然妹;王有志;雷洪涛;李荣春

云南菌视界生物科技有限公司 云南省级(珍稀食用菌)企业工程技术中心 昆明市级(食用菌)企业工程技术中心,云南 昆明 650200云南菌视界生物科技有限公司 云南省级(珍稀食用菌)企业工程技术中心 昆明市级(食用菌)企业工程技术中心,云南 昆明 650200云南菌视界生物科技有限公司 云南省级(珍稀食用菌)企业工程技术中心 昆明市级(食用菌)企业工程技术中心,云南 昆明 650200云南菌视界生物科技有限公司 云南省级(珍稀食用菌)企业工程技术中心 昆明市级(食用菌)企业工程技术中心,云南 昆明 650200云南菌视界生物科技有限公司 云南省级(珍稀食用菌)企业工程技术中心 昆明市级(食用菌)企业工程技术中心,云南 昆明 650200云南菌视界生物科技有限公司 云南省级(珍稀食用菌)企业工程技术中心 昆明市级(食用菌)企业工程技术中心,云南 昆明 650200云南菌视界生物科技有限公司 云南省级(珍稀食用菌)企业工程技术中心 昆明市级(食用菌)企业工程技术中心,云南 昆明 650200云南菌视界生物科技有限公司 云南省级(珍稀食用菌)企业工程技术中心 昆明市级(食用菌)企业工程技术中心,云南 昆明 650200

广叶绣球菌ITS序列主成分分析聚类分析种质资源评价

Sparassis latifoliaITS sequenceprincipal component analysisclustering analysisgermplasm resource evaluation

《菌物学报》 2026 (7)

109-123,15

云南省(珍稀食用菌)企业技术中心专项资金(JSJ2023016KJ)This work was supported by the Yunnan Province(Rare Edible Fungi)Enterprise Technology Center Special Fund(JSJ2023016KJ).

10.13346/j.mycosystema.250271

评论