就医技术焦虑评估工具的范围综述OA
Assessment tools for medical technology-related anxiety:a scoping review
目的:检索国内外现有就医技术焦虑相关评估工具,分析其特征、信效度及适用性等核心要素,为评估工具的筛选和开发提供参考.方法:采用范围综述,以PRISMA-ScR报告清单为指导,系统检索中国知网、万方数据库、PubMed 等6个数据库,检索时限为建库至2025年6月10日.结果:最终纳入18篇文献,提炼出12个就医技术焦虑评估工具.结论:现有12个工具普遍存在结构单一、信效度论证不足、本土化适配性欠缺及忽视焦虑动态性变化等问题,未来需要结合具体的医疗场景来优化工具结构与测量技术,同时兼顾文化差异以提升其实际应用价值.
Objective:To identify and analyze existing domestic and international assessment tools for medical technology-related anxiety,analyze their core elements such as characteristics,reliability,validity and applicability,and provide reference for the screening and development of assessment tools.Methods:A scoping review was conducted following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines.Six databases,including CNKI,Wanfang,PubMed,etc.,were systematically searched from the establishment of the databases to June 10,2025.Results:A total of 18 articles were included,and 12 assessment tools for medical technology-related anxiety were extracted.Conclusion:The analysis reveals that the existing 12 tools generally have problems such as a single structure,insufficient reliability and validity verification,lack of localization adaptability,and neglect of dynamic changes in anxiety.In the future,it is necessary to optimize the tool structure and measurement technology in combination with specific medical scenarios,while taking into account cultural differences to enhance their practical application value.
刘晓静;俞姗姗;劳洁瑜;梁英英;王芳;陈三妹
312000,绍兴大学医学院312000,绍兴大学医学院312000,绍兴大学医学院绍兴第二医院绍兴第二医院312000,绍兴大学医学院
就医技术焦虑评估工具范围综述
medical technology-related anxietyassessment toolsscoping review
《全科护理》 2026 (15)
2851-2855,5
评论