首页|期刊导航|腹腔镜外科杂志|Gleason评分、全身炎症反应指数、预后营养指数与前列腺癌根治术后生化复发的相关性研究

Gleason评分、全身炎症反应指数、预后营养指数与前列腺癌根治术后生化复发的相关性研究OA

Correlation of Gleason score,systemic inflammatory response index,and prog-nostic nutritional index with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy

中文摘要英文摘要

目的:探讨 Gleason 评分、全身炎症反应指数(SIRI)、预后营养指数(PNI)对前列腺癌根治术后生化复发的预测价值.方法:回顾分析 2017 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月收治的 298 例前列腺癌患者的临床资料,定期随访至术后 5 年,根据是否生化复发,分为生化复发组(n=90)与非生化复发组(n=208).通过电子病历提取围手术期临床资料,包括术后 Gleason 评分、术前中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值、血小板与淋巴细胞比值、SIRI、PNI 等指标.采用多因素 Cox 回归分析筛选生化复发的影响因素,绘制受试者工作特征曲线评估 Gleason 评分、SIRI、PNI 对术后生化复发的预测价值.结果:单因素分析显示,与非生化复发组相比,生化复发组 T分期≥3b的比例、切缘阳性比例、术后 Gleason 评分及术前前列腺特异性抗原、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值、SIRI 均较高,PNI 较低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).多因素 Cox 回归分析显示,术后 Gleason 评分(HR=2.079,95%CI=1.315~3.287)、术前 SIRI(HR=1.896,95%CI=1.198~3.002)是前列腺癌根治术后生化复发的独立危险因素,PNI 为其独立保护性因素(HR=0.555,95%CI=0.339~0.909).受试者工作特征曲线显示,Gleason 评分、SIRI、PNI 联合预测前列腺癌根治术后生化复发的曲线下面积为 0.891,敏感性为 74.44%,特异性为 93.75%,预测效能优于单一 Gleason 评分、SIRI、PNI.结论:Gleason 评分、SIRI、PNI 是前列腺癌根治术后生化复发的独立影响因素,三者联合应用可早期预测生化复发风险,有助于临床早期采取干预措施.

Objective:To investigate the predictive value of Gleason score,systemic inflammatory response index(SIRI),and prognostic nutritional index(PNI)for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.Methods:The clinical data of 298 patients with prostate cancer admitted between Jan.2017 and Dec.2020 were retrospectively analyzed.All patients were regularly followed up for 5 years after surgery,and were categorized into the biochemical recurrence group(n=90)and the non-biochemical recurrence group(n=208)based on the occurrence of postoperative biochemical recurrence.Perioperative clinical data were extracted from electronic medical records,including postoperative Gleason score,preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio,platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio,SIRI,and PNI.Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to screen the influencing factors of biochemi-cal recurrence,and receiver operating characteristic curve was plotted to evaluate the predictive value of Gleason score,SIRI,and PNI for postoperative biochemical recurrence.Results:Univariate analysis revealed that compared with the non-biochemical recurrence group,the biochemical recurrence group had higher proportions of T stage≥3b and positive surgical margins,higher postoperative Glea-son score,preoperative prostate-specific antigen,neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio,and SIRI,and lower PNI,with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that postoperative Gleason score(HR=2.079,95%CI=1.315~3.287)and preoperative SIRI(HR=1.896,95%CI=1.198~3.002)were independent risk factors for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy,while PNI was an independent protective factor(HR=0.555,95%CI=0.339~0.909).Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that the combined detection of Gleason score,SIRI,and PNI achieved an area under the curve of 0.891 for predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy,with a sensitivity of 74.44%and a specificity of 93.75%,which was superior to the predictive efficacy of single application of Gleason score,SIRI,or PNI.Conclusions:Gleason score,SIRI,and PNI are independent influencing factors of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.The com-bined application of the three indicators can early predict the risk of postoperative biochemical recurrence and facilitate early clinical intervention.

刘岩;李佳

哈尔滨医科大学附属第一医院泌尿外科,黑龙江 哈尔滨,150000哈尔滨医科大学附属第一医院泌尿外科,黑龙江 哈尔滨,150000

医药卫生

前列腺肿瘤前列腺癌根治术肿瘤分级全身炎症反应指数营养评价数据相关性

Prostatic neoplasmsRadical prostatectomyNeoplasm gradingSystemic inflammatory response indexNutrition assessmentCorrelation of data

《腹腔镜外科杂志》 2026 (7)

515-521,526,8

黑龙江省自然科学基金(H2020-149)

10.13499/j.cnki.fqjwkzz.2026.07.515

评论