Catastrophic visceral arterial embolization after intra-aortic balloon pump withdrawal:a case report of mechanical thrombus strippingOA
Intra-aortic balloon pump(IABP)counterpulsation remains one of the most accessible forms of temporary mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock and high-risk coronary intervention.Its physiologic benefits,augmentation of diastolic coronary perfusion and reduction of afterload,make it a pragmatic bridge during periods of profound instability.Nonetheless,IABP therapy carries clinically meaningful complications,including access-site bleeding,limb ischemia,and less commonly visceral ischemia.Reported vascular complication rates vary widely across contemporary series,ranging from 0.94% to 31.1%,[1]reflecting differences in patient risk profiles,device size,anticoagulation practices,and monitoring strategies.In routine practice,clinicians often navigate a narrow therapeutic margin:preventing thromboembolism while minimizing bleeding,particularly in elderly patients with shock physiology and diffuse atherosclerosis.
Bai-Ling DAI;Shao-Peng WANG;Hai-Chen LU;Na CHEN;Wen-Qing YIN
Department of Cardiology,The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University,Dalian,ChinaDepartment of Cardiology,The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University,Dalian,ChinaDepartment of Cardiology,The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University,Dalian,ChinaDepartment of Cardiology,The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University,Dalian,ChinaDepartment of Cardiology,The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University,Dalian,China
医药卫生
diastolic coronary perfusionischemiavascular complicationthromboembolismtemporary mechanical circulatory supportintra aortic balloon pumpmechanical thrombus strippingcatastrophic visceral arterial embolization
《Journal of Geriatric Cardiology》 2026 (6)
P.368-372,5
评论