高速列车穿越地下车站气动压力缓解措施动模型试验研究OA
Experimental study on aerodynamic pressure mitigation measures for high-speed trains passing through underground stations using a moving model rig
高速列车穿越地下车站会产生显著的气动效应,设置有效的缓解措施是减小气动压力、保障列车安全运行的必要条件.采用动模型试验的方法,搭建了缩比为1︰20的列车-隧道-车站耦合模型试验平台,真实复现了列车穿越地下车站时的复杂气动效应,通过重复性试验验证了试验平台的可靠性.分析列车以350 km/h速度穿越地下车站时隧道壁面、屏蔽门表面以及隔墙的压力变化特性,并从压力波传播、反射和叠加的角度分析了活塞风井的位置、面积以及缓冲结构开口率对各区域压力的影响机制.研究结果表明:在两侧中心布置活塞风井的压力缓解效果最佳,增大活塞风井面积有助于缓解屏蔽门表面压力,增大隧道缓冲结构开口率可显著降低洞口微气压波幅值,在距隧道出口0.5、1.0和2.5 m处,缓冲结构开口率为19.2%时的微气压波幅值与开口率为11.5%时的相比分别减小18.83%、19.42%和34.09%.试验结果可为列车高速穿越地下车站的运行状态以及车站和隧道内压力缓解措施的设置提供数据支撑.
High-speed trains passing through underground stations generate significant aerodynamic effects,and effective mitigation measures are required to reduce aerodynamic pressure and ensure safe train operation.In this study,a moving model test method was adopted,and a 1︰20 scaled train-tunnel-station coupled model test platform was constructed to realistically replicate the complex aerodynamic phenomena during train passage through underground stations.The reliability of the test platform was verified through repeatability tests.The pressure variation characteristics on tunnel walls,platform screen door(PSD)surfaces,and partition walls were analyzed when the train speed reached 350 km/h.Furthermore,the influence mechanisms of piston ventilation shaft location and area,as well as the opening ratio of the tunnel buffer structure,were investigated from the perspectives of pressure wave propagation,reflection,and superposition.The results show that arranging piston ventilation shafts centrally on both sides yields the optimal pressure mitigation effect.The results show that increasing the area of the piston ventilation shafts effectively alleviates the pressure on PSD surfaces.In addition,increasing the opening ratio of the tunnel buffer structure significantly reduces the amplitude of micro-pressure wave at the tunnel portal.Specifically,at distances of 0.5,1.0 and 2.5 m from the exit,the micro-pressure wave amplitudes with a 19.2%opening ratio decrease by 18.83%,19.42%,and 34.09%,respectively,compared to those with an 11.5%opening ratio.These findings provide data support for evaluating the operational status of high-speed trains and for optimizing the design of pressure mitigation measures in tunnel-station systems.
邹时晓;江衍;罗瑜萱;周丹;孟爽
南昌昌北国际机场有限公司,江西 南昌,330038南昌昌北国际机场有限公司,江西 南昌,330038南昌昌北国际机场有限公司,江西 南昌,330038中南大学交通运输工程学院轨道交通安全教育部重点实验室,湖南 长沙,410075||中南大学轨道交通安全关键技术国际合作联合实验室,湖南 长沙,410075||中南大学轨道交通列车安全保障技术国家地方联合工程研究中心,湖南 长沙,410075中南大学交通运输工程学院轨道交通安全教育部重点实验室,湖南 长沙,410075||中南大学轨道交通安全关键技术国际合作联合实验室,湖南 长沙,410075||中南大学轨道交通列车安全保障技术国家地方联合工程研究中心,湖南 长沙,410075
交通工程
高速列车地下车站气动压力活塞风井动模型试验
high-speed trainunderground stationaerodynamic pressurepiston airshaftmoving model tests
《中南大学学报(自然科学版)》 2026 (6)
2413-2425,13
国家自然科学基金资助项目(U2468220)(Project(U2468220)supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China)
评论