基于隐结构模型和D-S证据理论的乳腺癌中医辨证研究OA
Study on TCM Syndrome Differentiation of Breast Cancer Based on Latent Structure Model and D-S Evidence Theory
目的 针对利用隐结构模型进行乳腺癌中医辨证分型中专家主观判断差异大、结论稳定性不足的问题,构建基于隐结构模型与D-S证据理论融合的决策支持框架用于确定聚类证型,以提升隐结构模型研究过程中聚类分析的辨证客观性与分型精准度.方法 筛选用于模型的包含完整量化指标的典型临床研究数据,采用群决策理论整合多专家经验,构建两阶段辨证模型:第一阶段通过隐结构分析挖掘证候要素间潜在关联模式,第二阶段以乳腺癌症状为识别框架,将隐结构辨证结果作为基本概率分配,运用专家经验对其进行证据融合,最终以Dempster合成规则对中医辨证多源证据进行冲突消解与可信度融合,以此判断结果可以量化方案对隐结构模型结果进行聚类.结果 共使用927例乳腺癌患者症状信息,在较难判断证型归属的隐变量Y1的分析过程中通过决策支持框架最终得出多疑善怒对应证型即肝郁痰凝证可作为Y1的聚类判断标准.结论 模型通过量化证据融合机制可有效降低中医专家证据主观不确定性,为隐结构模型进一步聚类分析提供可解释的决策支持工具,在保留整体辨证思维的同时显著提升标准化水平.
Objective To construct a decision support framework integrating LSM and Dempster-Shafer(D-S)evidence theory to determine clustered syndrome patterns by addressing the issues of significant inter-expert subjectivity and insufficient stability in conclusions when using the latent structure model(LSM)for TCM syndrome differentiation of breast cancer;To enhance the objectivity of syndrome differentiation and the precision of pattern classification during the clustering analysis phase of LSM research.Methods Typical clinical research data containing complete quantitative indicators were screened for the model.Group decision-making theory was applied to integrate the experience of multiple experts.A two-stage syndrome differentiation model was established:in the first stage,LSM was used to identify latent association patterns among syndrome elements;in the second stage,using breast cancer symptoms as the identification framework,the LSM differentiation results were used as the basic probability assignment,and expert experience was incorporated for evidence fusion via the D-S theory.The Dempster combination rule was finally applied to resolve conflicts and fuse the credibility of multi-source TCM evidence,providing a quantitative solution for clustering the results of the LSM.Results Based on symptom data from 927 breast cancer patients,in the analysis process of the latent variable Y1,which was difficult to determine the classification of syndrome types,the decision support framework was used to ultimately determine that the corresponding syndrome type of suspicious and angry syndrome,namely liver depression and phlegm coagulation syndrome,could be used as the clustering criteria for Y1.Conclusion The model effectively reduces the subjective uncertainty of TCM expert evidence through a quantitative evidence fusion mechanism,which can provide an interpretable decision support tool for further clustering analysis and significantly improve the standardization level while preserving holistic syndrome differentiation thinking.
陈博文;刘津佩;赵宇心;肖茂淋;张鹏飞
成都中医药大学智能医学学院,四川 成都 611137成都中医药大学智能医学学院,四川 成都 611137成都中医药大学智能医学学院,四川 成都 611137成都中医药大学智能医学学院,四川 成都 611137成都中医药大学智能医学学院,四川 成都 611137
医药卫生
乳腺癌隐结构模型D-S证据理论文献研究证候要素
breast cancerlatent structure modelDempster-Shafer evidence theoryliterature researchsyndrome element
《中国中医药信息杂志》 2026 (8)
49-55,7
国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(62406044)四川省自然科学基金面上项目(2024NSFSC0721)中国博士后科学基金会国资计划B档(GZB20230092)中国博士后科学基金第74批面上资助(2023M740383)
评论