首页|期刊导航|临床医学工程|基于呼吸力学监护仪闭环反馈系统下不同镇静方案在机械通气患者中的应用

基于呼吸力学监护仪闭环反馈系统下不同镇静方案在机械通气患者中的应用OA

Application of Different Sedation Regimens Under Closed-Loop Feedback Sys-tem Based on Respiratory Mechanics Monitor in Patients Undergoing Me-chanical Ventilation

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 探讨基于呼吸力学监护仪闭环反馈系统下不同镇静方案在机械通气患者中的应用效果.方法 回顾性分析2023年1月至2026年1月本院收治的100例行机械通气患者的临床资料,根据镇静方案分为对照组与研究组.两组均予瑞芬太尼持续镇痛,并在呼吸力学监护仪闭环反馈系统辅助下调整镇静深度.对照组加用咪达唑仑注射液,研究组加用甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑.比较两组的镇静相关指标、呼吸力学参数、血气分析指标、炎症与氧化应激指标及不良反应发生情况.结果 研究组的镇静达标时间、停药后苏醒时间、拔管时间均短于对照组,补救镇静次数少于对照组(P<0.05).给药后2h、6h、12h、24 h,研究组的平台压及气道阻力均低于对照组,肺静态顺应性高于对照组(P<0.05).给药后24h,研究组的PaO2、SaO2均高于对照组(P<0.05).给药后24h,研究组的MDA、IL-6、TNF-α水平均低于对照组,SOD水平高于对照组(P<0.05).两组的不良反应总发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 基于呼吸力学监护仪闭环反馈系统下,瑞马唑仑联合瑞芬太尼方案在镇静效率、呼吸力学改善及炎性反应控制方面优于咪达唑仑联合瑞芬太尼方案,且安全性相当.

Objective To investigate the application effects of different sedation regimens under closed-loop feedback system based on respiratory mechanics monitor in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation.Methods The clinical data of 100 patients undergoing mechanical ventilation admitted to our hospital from January 2023 to January 2026 were retrospectively analyzed.They were divided into the control group and the study group according to the sedation regimen.Both groups received continuous analgesia with remifentanil,and the sedation depth was adjusted with the assistance of the closed-loop feedback system of respiratory mechanics monitor.The control group was additionally given midazolam injection,while the study group was additionally given remimazolam tosilate.The sedation-related indicators,respiratory mechanics parameters,blood gas analysis indicators,inflammatory and oxidative stress indicators and occurrence of adverse events were compared between the two groups.Results The time to achieve target sedation,time to awakening after drug withdrawal and extubation time in the study group were shorter than those in the control group,and the frequency of remedial sedation was less than that in the control group(P<0.05).At 2 h,6 h,12 h and 24 h after administration,the plateau pressure and airway resistance in the study group were lower than those in the control group,and the static lung compliance was significantly higher than that in the control group(P<0.05).At 24 h after administration,the arterial partial pressure of oxygen(PaO2)and arterial oxygen saturation(SaO2)in the study group were higher than those in the control group(P<0.05).At 24 h after administration,the levels of malondialdehyde(MDA),interleukin-6(IL-6)and tumor necrosis factor-α(TNF-α)in the study group were lower than those in the control group,and the level of superoxide dismutase(SOD)was higher than that in the control group(P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the total incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusions Under the closed-loop feedback system based on respiratory mechanics monitor,the remimazolam combined with remifentanil regimen is superior to the midazolam combined with remifentanil regimen in terms of sedation efficiency,improvement of respiratory mechanics and control of inflammatory response,with comparable safety.

胡静;冯永海

郑州大学第五附属医院呼吸与危重症医学科,河南郑州 450052郑州大学第五附属医院呼吸与危重症医学科,河南郑州 450052

医药卫生

呼吸力学监护仪闭环反馈系统瑞马唑仑咪达唑仑瑞芬太尼机械通气镇静

Respiratory mechanics monitorClosed-loop feedback systemRemimazolamMidazolamRemifentanilMechanical ventilationSedation

《临床医学工程》 2026 (7)

800-804,5

中国红十字基金会医学赋能公益专项基金"医学赋能与人才培养计划"科研项目(第二批)(CRCF-YSFN-202201149)

10.3969/j.issn.1674-4659.2026.07.0800

评论