首页|期刊导航|西安交通大学学报(社会科学版)|社会计算的"三端协同"如何重塑知识生产?

社会计算的"三端协同"如何重塑知识生产?OACHSSCD

Reshaping Knowledge Production in the Social Sciences:A"Tripartite Synergy"Framework for Computational Social Science

中文摘要英文摘要

计算社会科学在数字时代引发了方法论变革,以大数据、云计算与人工智能(AI)大模型为代表的社会计算技术,构成支撑这一变革的三大核心方法论要素,分别对应经验端、环境端与分析端,三者形成"三端协同"的结构性耦合.大数据作为经验端,为研究提供海量、多模态的非结构化数据;云计算作为环境端,提供应对数据存储与算力挑战的基础设施;AI大模型作为分析端,实现"算法民主化",降低研究门槛并提升复杂分析的效率.这种协同从根本上重塑了社会科学的知识生产逻辑:研究路径先从"假设驱动"的演绎逻辑转向"数据驱动"的归纳逻辑,进而随着AI深度介入假设生成与理论建构,走向人机协同下"数据—理论"双向迭代的溯因循环,呈现出科学发现范式跃迁的趋势.针对"三端"存在的数据代表性、资源门槛与算法偏见等现实挑战,就基础设施建设、跨学科人才培养与范式融合提出前瞻性思考.

Along with the rapid advancement of information technology,computational social science is comprehensively transitioning from its early"data-intensive"exploratory phase into an"intelligence-intensive"new stage.However,existing research predominantly focuses on conceptual definitions or the application of localized tools,lacking systematic theoretical integration regarding the core technological elements underpinning this paradigm shift—namely,big data,cloud computing,and large language models.This paper aims to construct an innovative"three-terminal synergy"analytical framework,conceptualizing big data as the empirical terminal,cloud computing as the environmental terminal,and large language models as the analytical terminal.It deeply reveals the structural coupling of these three elements at the methodological level and systematically explores how this coupling fundamentally reshapes the logic of knowledge production in the social sciences. Employing a methodology that combines theoretical construction with comparative analysis,this study dissects the fundamental divergences between traditional quantitative paradigms and emerging computational approaches.The traditional paradigm relies heavily on"hypothesis-driven"logic and small-sample structured data,following a top-down deductive pathway.Conversely,the computational paradigm shifts toward a"data-driven"approach utilizing full-sample unstructured data,presenting a bottom-up inductive trajectory.Building on this,the paper elucidates that the maturation of computational social science is the systemic outcome of"three-terminal synergy".Specifically,the empirical terminal reconstructs the empirical object of the social sciences by integrating multi-source heterogeneous data from social networks,mobile trajectories,and IoT sensors,enabling the micro-mapping of macro-social structures through multimodal,holographic tracking.The environmental terminal,leveraging distributed system architectures and elastic underlying computing power,effectively dissolves the physical bottlenecks of storing and processing massive data,providing indispensable physical infrastructure for large-scale panoramic research.Meanwhile,the analytical terminal,centered on large language models,transcends early shallow models.Through cutting-edge capabilities like deep semantic understanding and zero-shot classification,it achieves true"algorithmic democratization",empowering researchers to efficiently handle sentiment computation,intent recognition,and automated theoretical coding of massive unstructured texts.Together,these three terminals form a deeply interactive closed loop of"underlying data supply,computing environment support,and top-level intelligent parsing". However,this paper prudently highlights that while the"three-terminal synergy"vastly unleashes methodological potential,it inherently harbors structural tensions and epistemological crises.At the empirical terminal,the facade of full-sample big data conceals deeper biases stemming from the digital divide and traps studies in the pursuit of superficial correlations at the expense of causality.At the environmental terminal,research barriers created by the computing power divide,high deployment costs,and the data security risks associated with commercial public clouds are becoming increasingly severe.At the analytical terminal,the inherent algorithmic black boxes of complex parameter models,the factual hallucinations of large language models during reasoning,and systemic biases resulting from polluted pre-training corpora pose severe threats to the validity and reliability highly valued in social science research. In response to these multi-dimensional tensions,this paper proposes three pathways that possess both theoretical depth and operational feasibility.First,at the infrastructure level,it calls for national entities or top research institutions to spearhead the construction of autonomous and controllable public cloud platforms and high-quality academic corpora,thereby breaking the data silos and computing monopolies.Second,at the talent cultivation level,there is an urgent need to build an interdisciplinary educational system bridging data literacy,algorithmic logic,and sociological imagination.Third,at the research standardization level,it strongly advocates for localized deployment based on open-source large language models and the integration of mixed methodologies to ensure reproducibility.The core contribution of this paper lies in pioneering the elevation of cloud computing platforms and large language models to the status of independent and equal sociological methodological elements.Future research should seek a dynamic balance between technological propulsion and theoretical guidance within a human-machine collaborative"abductive reasoning"loop,thereby upholding the ultimate pursuit of causal inference and deep mechanism explanation in the social sciences.

龚为纲;陈斯忆;王天健

武汉大学 社会学院,湖北 武汉 430072多伦多大学 社会学系,加拿大 多伦多 M1C 1A4武汉大学 社会学院,湖北 武汉 430072

社会科学

计算社会科学知识生产科学发现范式大数据云计算AI大模型算法人机协同数据驱动

computational social scienceknowledge productionparadigm of scientific discoverybig datacloud computinglarge AI modelalgorithmhuman-machine collaborationdata-driven

《西安交通大学学报(社会科学版)》 2026 (4)

23-34,12

国家社会科学基金项目(22BSH024).

10.15896/j.xjtuskxb.202604003

评论