基于正则化5×2交叉验证投票的对抗验证方法OA
Adversarial Validation Based on Regularized 5×2 Cross-validated Voting
在机器学习中,对抗验证方法通常使用交叉验证来估计对抗分类模型的错误率,并将其与随机猜测进行比较,从而推断训练集和测试集之间的分布差异.该方法进一步使用交叉验证得到对抗标签的预测概率估计,并依此估计从训练集中选择与测试集分布相近的样本子集作为验证集,以提升机器学习模型在测试集上的泛化性.因此,交叉验证估计是对抗验证方法的核心要素.现有对抗验证方法通常使用基于平均方式聚合而成的交叉验证估计.这种平均聚合估计虽可降低对抗分类模型性能估计的方差,但无法从期望意义上提升该估计与随机猜测之间的差距,从而限制了对抗验证方法的性能.为此,该文提出了一种基于多数投票聚合的正则化5×2 交叉验证估计,并构建了相应的 McNemar 检验统计量及预测概率估计形式,形成了一种新颖的对抗验证方法.在5 种常用分类算法和18 个数据集上的实验结果表明,该方法在分布差异推断任务与验证集选择任务上均表现出优良的性能.
In machine learning,an adversarial validation method typically employs cross-validation to estimate the performance of an ad-versarial classification model and compares it with random guessing for inferring the distribution equivalence between the training and the test sets.On the basis of the prediction probability estimators with regard to adversarial labels obtained from cross-validation,the method then selects a subset of samples from the training set that closely matches the distribution of the test set to serve as a validation set,thereby enhancing the generalization ability of a machine learning model on the test set.Thus,cross-validation estimation plays a core role in an adversarial validation method.However,the existing adversarial validation methods use an averaged aggregation to produce cross-validated estimators.Although the averaged aggregation can reduce the variance in the cross-validated estimator of the performance of an adversarial classification model,it is incapable to enlarge the difference between the expected error rates of an adversarial classification model and random guessing,and thus it constrains the performance of an adversarial validation in the inference of the distribution equivalence and the selection of a validation set.Therefore,we propose a regularized 5×2 cross-validated voting estimator and develop a corresponding McNemar's test statistic as well as several types of prediction probability estimation to form a novel adversarial validation method.Experimental results on 5 commonly-used classification algorithms and 18 datasets demonstrate that the proposed method achieves promising performance in both distribution equivalence inference and validation set selection.
陈亚锋;张志涤;薛彦;王瑞波;宋毅君;曹学飞
山西大学 自动化与软件学院,山西 太原 030031山西大学 自动化与软件学院,山西 太原 030031晋中学院 信息技术与工程系,山西 晋中 030619山西大学 现代教育技术学院,山西 太原 030006山西大学 现代教育技术学院,山西 太原 030006山西大学 自动化与软件学院,山西 太原 030031
信息技术与安全科学
对抗验证正则化交叉验证多数投票McNemar检验分布差异
adversarial validationregularized cross-validationmajority votingMcNemar's testdistribution difference
《计算机技术与发展》 2026 (8)
78-86,95,10
山西省基础研究计划资助项目(202303021212023)国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(61806115)
评论