基于层次分析法的重金属污染土固化效果评价OA
Assessment of Stabilization Effect on Heavy Metal-Contaminated Soil Through Analytic Hierarchy Process
[目的]针对新型固化剂(赤泥+电石渣+磷石膏)在不同重金属污染土固化效果综合评价中未形成统一的评价体系,构建评价模型,厘清评价指标权重.[方法]基于"赤泥+钙基+磷基"型固化剂,针对不同高浓度重金属污染土,采用层次分析法,研究了重金属污染固化土性能评价主要影响因素,建立了重金属污染土固化剂固化效果评价模型,计算了固化效果评价指标权重,并结合微观分析与重金属形态分析对研究结论进行验证,结果可靠性高.[结果]研究结果表明,重金属污染土固化剂固化效果评价指标排序为:抗压强度=渗透系数>pH 值>环境危害度>固化效率,权重指标分别为0.320、0.320、0.164、0.160、0.036.
[Purposes]In view of the lack of a unified evaluation system for comprehensively as-sessing the solidification performance of the novel curing agent(red mud+carbide slag+phospho-gypsum)on soils contaminated with different heavy metals,in this study,an evaluation model is estab-lished and the weight of each evaluation index is clarified.[Methods]In this study,a"red mud+cal-cium-based+phosphorus-based"stabilizer was used to examine the performance of soils contaminat-ed with high concentrations of various heavy metals,and the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP)was employed to identify the primary factors influencing stabilization effectiveness.An evaluation model was developed to assess the stabilization performance of the contaminated soils,and the weights of the evaluation indices were determined.The study's conclusions were validated through microscopic anal-yses and speciation analyses of heavy metals,confirming the high reliability of the results.[Results]The study results indicate that the factors influencing the evaluation of heavy metal soil stabilizers ef-fectiveness are as follows:compressive strength=permeability coefficient>pH value>environmen-tal hazard>stabilization efficiency,with corresponding weight coefficients of 0.320,0.320,0.164,0.160,and 0.036,respectively.
郝国栋;王晨;杨振;刘晓勇;董晓强
太原理工大学 土木工程学院,山西 太原太原理工大学 土木工程学院,山西 太原太原理工大学 土木工程学院,山西 太原中铁城建集团第一工程有限公司,山西 太原太原理工大学 土木工程学院,山西 太原||土木工程防灾与控制山西省重点实验室,山西 太原
资源环境
固化/稳定技术重金属污染土层次分析法固化效果
stabilization/solidification(S/S)technologyheavy metal-contaminated soilanalytic hierarchy processsolidification effectiveness
《太原理工大学学报》 2026 (4)
720-727,8
国家自然科学基金资助项目(52378360,51978438)
评论