首页|期刊导航|太平洋学报|中美战略竞争影响中国—东盟产业合作的四重逻辑与现实效应

中美战略竞争影响中国—东盟产业合作的四重逻辑与现实效应OACHSSCD

The Ripple Effects of Great Power Competition:Four Theoretical Logics and Empirical Impacts of China-U.S.Strategic Competition in China-ASEAN Industrial Cooperation

中文摘要英文摘要

当前,中美竞争已演变为涵盖贸易、科技、全球治理、地缘战略等领域的全方位博弈.中美战略竞争不仅推动了全球供应链重组,也正在重塑国际产业合作格局,特别是对中国—东盟产业合作产生了系统性影响.本文在借鉴传统国际产业合作理论的基础上,提出领先大国与后发大国在贸易、科技、全球治理、地缘战略领域的竞争影响区域产业合作的四重逻辑,并在此基础上分析中美战略竞争影响中国—东盟产业合作的现实效应.研究认为中美贸易竞争引发了贸易和投资转移效应,贸易转移强化了中国与东盟国家贸易依存关系,投资转移则促进了双方产业链深度融合;美国实施的"小院高墙"科技战略刺激了中国关键技术自主研发和突破,推动中国与东盟国家在高新技术产业领域的合作;中国积极参与全球治理,不断提升在国际规则制定中的话语权,为中国—东盟产业合作创造了有利的制度环境.然而,不可忽视的是,美国在东盟国家的经济捆绑和安全联盟策略也对中国—东盟产业合作造成显著外部制约.

Currently,Sino-U.S.competition has evolved into a comprehensive strategic rivalry spanning trade,technology,global governance,and geostrategy.This strategic competition has not only accelerated the restructuring of global supply chains but is also profoundly reshaping the landscape of international industrial cooperation,particularly exerting a systemic impact on China-ASEAN industrial collaboration.Drawing on traditional theories of international industrial cooperation,this paper proposes a four-fold theoretical logic framework to analyze how great power competition in the domains of trade,technology,global governance,and geostrategy influences regional industrial cooperation.It then examines the empirical effects of U.S.-China strategic competition on China-ASEAN industrial cooperation.Theoretically,great power strategic competition influences regional industrial cooperation through four dimensions:market logic,technological logic,institutional logic,and bloc logic.Trade competition,which intervenes in market access via tariff and non-tariff barriers,constitutes the most direct and explicit pathway affecting regional industrial cooperation.Technological competition drives a strategic and long-term restructuring of the industrial cooperation landscape.Global governance competition,primarily through rule-making and institutional arrangements,exerts systemic influences on regional industrial cooperation at the architecture level.Geostrategic competition,by leveraging geopolitical instruments to steer regional countries toward preferential alignment,shapes the trajectory of regional industrial cooperation in an indirect yet profound manner.Empirically,Sino-U.S.trade competition has triggered notable trade diversion and investment diversion effects:trade diversion has strengthened China's trade dependence on ASEAN countries,while investment diversion has promoted deeper industrial chain integration between the two sides.The U.S."small yard,high fence"technology strategy has stimulated China's independent innovation in critical technologies and advanced China-ASEAN cooperation in high-tech industries.Meanwhile,China has actively participated in global governance and enhanced its discourse power in international rule-making,thereby creating a more favorable institutional environment for China-ASEAN industrial cooperation.However,the United States' economic binding strategies and security alliances in ASEAN countries have imposed significant external constraints on China-ASEAN industrial collaboration.Looking ahead,to further strengthen China-ASEAN industrial cooperation,China may consider tapping deeper cooperation potential with ASEAN countries in emerging sectors such as artificial intelligence,5G/6G,and clean energy,so as to foster an emerging industrial ecosystem featuring regional interconnectivity and complementary strengths.Building on the China-ASEAN FTA 3.0,both sides could jointly dismantle cross-border trade and investment barriers and expand cooperation space for regional industrial and supply chains.Strategic planning and layout should be optimized,with tailored cooperation areas and implementation modalities designed to accommodate the development stages,resource endowments,specific demands,and risk tolerance of individual ASEAN member states.Furthermore,deeper integration into regional and global industrial governance mechanisms will help forge regional consensus with ASEAN countries in emerging governance domains including AI ethics,cross-border data security,and low-carbon technology certification,thereby building a stable and predictable institutional environment for sustained bilateral cooperation.

缪慧星

广西大学,广西南宁 530004

管理科学

贸易竞争科技竞争全球治理竞争地缘战略竞争中国—东盟产业合作

trade competitiontechnological competitionglobal governance competitiongeostrategic competitionChina-ASEAN industrial cooperation

《太平洋学报》 2026 (6)

42-55,14

本文系国家社会科学基金项目"新的国际背景下中国—东盟区域产业链重构路径及策略研究"(24BGJ051)、广西高校人文社会科学重点研究基地中国—东盟研究院基金资助项目"美国'对等关税'对中国(广西)与东盟经贸合作的传导机制及应对策略研究"(2025JDZD008)的阶段性研究成果.

10.14015/j.cnki.1004-8049.2026.06.004

评论