基于"结构-工具-效力"框架的集体产业用地更新政策量化分析——以广州为例OA

Collective-owned industrial land is the primary focus for addressing inefficient land use in the Pearl River Delta.Policy issuance quality is critical to the effectiveness of redevelopment efforts.Since 2009,the redevelopment of collective-owned industrial land in Guangzhou has transformed from a market-driven three-olds renewal to government-led inefficient land redevelopment.This shift has made evaluating the effectiveness of multisource policies increasingly challenging.Analyzing the textual quality of existing policies and the evolution of redevelopment policies can provide valuable insights for policy adjustments in the era of inefficient land redevelopment.Considering policy system analysis,this study constructed an analytical framework encompassing"policy structure-policy instruments-policy effectiveness,"employed bibliometric and content analysis methods,and quantitatively examined the structural features,instrument characteristics,and effectiveness of policies related to collective-owned industrial land redevelopment in Guangzhou from 2009 to 2024.Policy optimization suggestions are proposed based on these findings.The results indicate that:1)Governance of collective-owned industrial land redevelopment involves multiple functional departments,with policy formulation primarily coordinated by the municipal government and led by the Municipal Bureau of Industry and Information Technology and the Municipal Bureau of Planning and Natural Resources.Through enhancement and strengthening of the territorial land-use control system,policy evolution has progressed through three stages:"stimulation-strict control-supervision."2)From"three-olds renewal"to"inefficient land redevelopment,"high-level urban renewal policy institutions have driven the evolution of policy objectives and promoted the iteration of policy instruments.Since 2015,Guangzhou has primarily relied on incentive-based renewal policy instruments to promote village-level industrial parks,providing low-cost industrial spaces through"industrial-to-industrial redevelopment"by expanding land acquisition,enhancing interest incentives for redevelopment,and improving legal procedures for historical land.3)The overall synergistic performance of collective-owned industrial land redevelopment policies is strong,with higher-level policies demonstrating better coordination performance than lower-level policies.According to PMC model calculations,the completeness of policy timeliness and policy perspectives was relatively low,whereas that of policy fields,forms,and goals was relatively high.Despite the continuous iteration of collective industrial land renewal policies,issues such as insufficient interdepartmental collaboration,incomplete pilot policy frameworks,and a lack of policy diversity remain.We recommend enhancing support for industrial investment promotion and operation and maintenance in back-end policy instruments and strengthening spatial differentiation in policy content.To improve policy synergy,it is advisable to restructure the policy issuance framework,ensure stability by extending policy validity,and increase precision by refining district-level policies.Synergy among policies from different departments is crucial for the successful implementation of initiatives.The marginal contribution of this study lies in establishing a quantitative evaluation framework for the systematic analysis of collective-owned industrial land redevelopment policies,which is innovative in the theoretical exploration and empirical analysis of public policy systems.