首页|期刊导航|建筑结构学报|不同内填形式的带纵肋铝合金圆柱抗震性能试验研究

不同内填形式的带纵肋铝合金圆柱抗震性能试验研究OA

Experimental study on seismic performance of longitudinally ribbed aluminum alloy circular columns with different infill configurations

中文摘要英文摘要

为研究铝合金建筑立柱和人行桥墩柱的抗震性能,设计了 6根直径420 mm带纵肋铝合金圆柱,开展低周反复荷载试验,研究铝合金圆柱的破坏特征、滞回曲线、骨架曲线、延性、承载力和耗能能力、刚度退化等.其中圆柱的基础形式分别为钢筋混凝土和钢套筒,设计轴压比分别为0.075和0.15,铝合金圆管内填形式分别为空管、混凝土、钢筋混凝土和型钢混凝土.结果表明:带纵肋铝合金圆柱的破坏形态根据基础和内填形式不同主要表现为柱脚断裂、鼓曲变形和柱底截面塑性变形等;设置混凝土基础的空管圆柱的滞回曲线呈弓形,其他滞回曲线接近于S形;设置钢套筒基础的铝合金柱与基础之间连接性能较差,当位移角小于1%时耗能能力高于设置混凝土基础的铝合金柱,而进入弹塑性阶段后设置混凝土基础的耗能能力更好;设置混凝土基础的铝合金柱刚度和水平承载力比设置钢套筒基础的柱高约10.8%,但柱的延性则低34.7%;按内填形式不同,刚度和水平承载力从大到小依次为型钢混凝土柱、钢筋混凝土柱、混凝土柱和空管柱,但柱刚度过大时导致基础先发生破坏、耗能能力下降.

To investigate the seismic performance of aluminum alloy building columns and pedestrian bridge piers,six longitudinal ribbed aluminum alloy circular columns with a diameter of 420 mm were designed and tested under low-cycle reversed cyclic loading.The failure characteristics,hysteretic curves,skeleton curves,ductility,bearing capacity,energy dissipation capacity,and stiffness degradation of the columns were investigated.The foundation forms of the columns were reinforced concrete and steel sleeves.Their designed axial compression ratios were 0.075 and 0.15,respectively.Four infill configurations for the aluminum alloy tubes,namely hollow tube,plain concrete,reinforced concrete,and steel-reinforced concrete,were adopted.The results indicate that the failure modes of ribbed aluminum alloy circular columns mainly consist of fracture at the column base,bulging deformation,and plastic deformation of the column base section,depending on the foundation type and infill configuration.The hysteretic curves of the hollow tube specimens with reinforced concrete foundation exhibit a bow shape,while the hysteretic curves of the other five specimens are close to an S shape.The specimens with steel sleeve foundations exhibit poor bonding performance between the aluminum alloy tube and the steel sleeve foundation.When the horizontal loading displacement angle is less than 1%,specimens with steel sleeve foundations exhibit higher energy dissipation capacity than the specimens with reinforced concrete foundations.In contrast,the specimens with reinforced concrete foundations exhibit higher energy dissipation capacity after entering the elastic-plastic stage.The stiffness and horizontal bearing capacity of aluminum alloy columns with reinforced concrete foundations are about 10.8%greater than those with steel sleeve foundations,yet the ductility of reinforced concrete foundation columns is 34.7%lower.In terms of infill type,the columns with steel-reinforced concrete infill display the highest stiffness and horizontal bearing capacity,followed by the columns with reinforced concrete infill,plain concrete infill,and hollow tube.However,excessive column stiffness may lead to the foundation to fail first and a reduction in the energy dissipation capacity.

温庆杰;李昌林;冯好男;任子健;刘均利

中国矿业大学力学与土木工程学院,江苏徐州 221116中国矿业大学力学与土木工程学院,江苏徐州 221116中国矿业大学力学与土木工程学院,江苏徐州 221116中国矿业大学力学与土木工程学院,江苏徐州 221116桂林理工大学土木工程学院,广西桂林 541004

建筑与水利

铝合金圆柱设置纵肋内填形式拟静力试验抗震性能

aluminum alloy circular columnlongitudinal ribbed tubebuilt-in formquasi-static testseismic performance

《建筑结构学报》 2026 (7)

116-126,11

10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2025.0428

评论