首页|期刊导航|海洋开发与管理|全球—地方互动视域下海南省海洋环境治理政策分析

全球—地方互动视域下海南省海洋环境治理政策分析OA

Analysis of Marine Environmental Governance Policies in Hainan Province From the Perspective of Global-Local Interaction

中文摘要英文摘要

全球化背景下海洋环境陆海统筹治理模式亟待通过全球—地方互动视域进行全面阐释.以海南省为典型案例分析海洋环境治理政策的多尺度协同逻辑,对于流动性全球化海洋环境治理实践具有重要意义.文章运用模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)和必要条件分析(NCA),探讨了制度导向型命令控制、空间治理型市场激励、技术驱动型信息公开和协同共治型公众参与四个因素对全球—地方互动视域下海南省海洋环境治理的协同影响和海洋环境治理差异化的多元组态路径.研究发现:(1)海南省海洋环境治理政策经历了起步探索、体系构建、战略深化以及高质量提升阶段;(2)任何单一因素都无法独立构成实现海洋环境治理的充分或必要条件,各要素组合产生3条海洋环境治理实践组态路径,可归为"政府主导型""多元协同型"和"公众驱动型"三种模式;(3)针对不同路径特征,应分别强化制度协同与信息治理能力、完善多主体协同治理机制以及提升公众参与的制度保障;(4)在全球—地方互动背景下,海洋环境治理政策应从海域治理的空间统筹、陆域治理的岸带管控及全球制度与地方实践之间的互动实现路径重构.未来海洋环境治理政策需在全球制度框架与地方实践的持续互动中协同推进,实现政策效能与生态—社会效益的显著提升.

Against the backdrop of globalization,the integrated land-sea governance model for the marine environment urgently requires comprehensive elucidation through the lens of global-local interaction.Analyzing the multi-scalar collaborative logic of marine environmental governance policies,taking Hainan Province as a representative case is of significant importance for advancing marine environmental governance practice within amid globalization dynamics.Using the fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis(fsQCA)method and necessary condition analysis(NCA),this paper explores the synergistic influence of four factors,namely,institution-oriented command and control,spatial governance-oriented market incentives,technology-driven information disclosure,and collaborative governance-oriented public participation,on the marine environmental governance in Hainan Province from the perspective of global-local interaction,and identifies multiple configurational pathways for differentiated marine environmental governance.The findings show that:(1)Hainan Province's marine environmental governance policy has undergone a phase of initial exploration,system construction,strategic advancement,and high-quality development.(2)No single factor alone constitutes a sufficient or necessary condition for realizing marine environmental governance;rather,the combination of various elements generates three distinct configurational pathways for governance practice,which can be categorized into three models:"Government-Led,""Multi-Stakeholder Collaborative,"and"Public-Driven."(3)In light of the specific characteristics of these different pathways,efforts should be directed toward-respectively-strengthening institutional coordination and information governance capabilities,refining multi-stakeholder collaborative governance mechanisms,and enhancing institutional safeguards for public participation.(4)Within the context of global-local interactions,marine environmental governance policies should undergo a reconstruction of their implementation pathways,focusing on the spatial coordination of marine domain governance,the coastal zone management of terrestrial domains,and the interplay between global institutions and local practices.Moving forward,marine environmental governance policies must be advanced synergistically through the continuous interaction between global institutional frameworks and local practices,thereby achieving a significant enhancement in both policy efficacy and eco-social benefits.

谢安祺;马仁锋

宁波大学地理科学与遥感技术学院 宁波 315211宁波大学地理科学与遥感技术学院 宁波 315211||浙江省新型重点专业智库宁波大学东海研究院 宁波 315211

社会科学

全球化陆海国土空间统筹治理海洋环境治理岛屿及毗连海域海洋人文地理

GlobalizationIntegrated land-sea territorial spatial governanceMarine environmental governanceIslands and their surrounding contiguous seasMarine human geography

《海洋开发与管理》 2026 (4)

14-32,19

国家社科基金重大项目"统筹水资源、水环境、水生态治理的机制和路径研究"(23&ZD105).

评论