乡村韧性与农户主观福祉的耦合协调及影响因素OACHSSCD
Coupling coordination between rural resilience and farmers' subjective well-being:A case of mining-agriculture composite areas
构建基于"生态-生计-社会网络"三维框架的乡村韧性测度体系,将农户感知纳入韧性评估,分析矿农复合区乡村韧性与农户主观福祉之间的关系.基于2023年矿农复合区农户调查数据,采用熵值-综合指数法、耦合协调度模型及随机森林回归,评估乡村韧性与农户主观福祉的耦合关系并识别关键影响因素.研究发现:1)矿农复合区乡村韧性水平较低,农户主观福祉处于中等水平:乡村韧性均值0.351(缓冲能力最高,非正式关系最低),主观福祉均值0.550(工作满意度显著偏低).2)整体耦合协调水平较高,但不同韧性子系统与福祉维度之间的协调性较弱:整体耦合协调度显示76.8%的农户处于协调发展阶段,但三子系统与六个福祉维度的耦合协调性均较差.3)生活质量满意度是影响耦合协调度差异的首要因素;当家庭存款达到约10万元后,耦合协调度的边际提升趋于减弱;净化水质满意度、家庭劳动力占比(0.50-0.65为跃升期)及村内事务参与频率为重点治理方向.研究表明,在矿农复合区中,土地与农业仍是农户维持生计和抵御风险的重要基础,但短期差异更易由生态安全、生计缓冲和治理嵌入变量拉开.文中结论主要适用于资源开发与农业生产交织的矿农复合区,不宜简单外推至纯农业乡村.
By establishing a rural resilience evaluation system under the three-dimensional framework of ecology,livelihood and social network,and integrating farmers' perceptions into resilience assessment,we analyze the correlation between rural resilience and farmers' subjective well-being in mining-agricultural compound areas.Based on household survey data from such areas in 2023,the entropy weight-comprehensive index method,coupling coordination degree model and random forest regression are employed to examine the coupling relationship between rural resilience and farmers' subjective well-being and identify core influencing factors.The results indicate that the rural resilience of the study areas is generally lower with an average value of 0.351(buffering capacity is the strongest while informal social networks are the weakest),and farmers' subjective well-being is at a moderate level with an average of 0.550,marked by lower job satisfaction.The overall coupling coordination degree is relatively high,with 76.8%of surveyed households in the coordinated development stage,whereas the coordination between the three resilience subsystems and six well-being dimensions is insufficient.Satisfaction with quality of life is the dominant factor affecting coupling coordination.The marginal growth of coupling coordination slows down when household savings reach about 100,000 yuan.Satisfaction with water purification,the proportion of household labor force(0.50-0.65 for rapid growth)and participation frequency in village affairs are key targets for governance.Land and agriculture remain critical supports for farmers to maintain livelihoods and cope with risks in mining-agricultural compound areas,while ecological security,livelihood buffering and governance embeddedness mainly account for short-term disparities.The conclusions apply primarily to rural areas featuring intertwined resource exploitation and agricultural production,and cannot be directly extended to purely agricultural villages.
严治琼;史兴民;麦尔哈巴·图尔贡
陕西师范大学地理科学与旅游学院,西安 710100陕西师范大学地理科学与旅游学院,西安 710100陕西师范大学地理科学与旅游学院,西安 710100
管理科学
乡村韧性生态-生计-社会网络主观福祉耦合协调随机森林矿农复合区
rural resilienceecology-livelihood-social networksubjective well-beingcoupling coordinationrandom forestmining-agriculture composite area
《干旱区资源与环境》 2026 (8)
28-38,11
教育部人文社科基金项目(21YJA840014)陕西省自然科学基础研究计划(2025JC-YBMS-279)资助.
评论