新文化秩序何以可能:技术嵌入下的乡村文化劳动OACHSSCD
How a New Cultural Order Takes Shape:Cultural Labor from a Technological Perspective—Evidence from Village Z
在村落文化演变过程中,技术在不同时期有不同的角色.基于霍耐特现代劳动的概念,可以将文化定义为基于制度、日常行为、地方性知识和本土经验混合在一起的活动,从文化劳动的视角解读20世纪下半叶至今乡村文化演变与技术的关系.研究围绕一个村落的文化活动展开,通过6年的参与式观察和深度访谈提出乡村传统文化形式主要以三种劳动类型保存下来:其一为个体的自发行为,其二为制度性集体活动,其三则为个体和组织结合的方式.随着乡村社会与外部世界之间交流的常态化,文化劳动成为乡村生活中一种"商品",在市场逻辑中获得了可以获得"报酬"的认可;另一方面,随着传统农业劳动在乡村社会中"地位"的下降,文化劳动在乡村社会日常生活中的位置,从文化悬置技术时期的组织主导到技术塑造劳动时期的个体自主性,再到不同圈子在技术平台的融合,扮演了塑造乡村新文化秩序的重要角色.
Technology plays differentiated roles in the evolution of village culture across historical periods.Drawing on Honneth's conception of modern labor,this study defines culture as integrated activities blending institutions,daily behaviors,local knowledge and indigenous experience.From the perspective of cultural labor,it interprets the relationship between rural cultural evolution and technology since the second half of the 20th century.Based on six years of participant observation and in-depth interviews focused on cultural activities in a single village,this paper concludes that traditional rural cultural forms are preserved through three types of labor:spontaneous individual activities,institutional collective events,and hybrid modes combining individuals and organizations.As exchanges between rural societies and the outside world normalize,cultural labor evolves in two ways.First,it becomes a rural"commodity"recognized with monetary compensation under market logic.Second,as traditional agricultural labor loses its dominant status in rural society,the position of cultural labor in daily rural life shifts from organization-led cultural activities under technology-isolated eras,to individual autonomy in technology-shaped labor periods,and finally to cross-group integration on technological platforms.Cultural labor thereby functions as a pivotal force shaping a new rural cultural order.
李红艳
中国农业大学 人文与发展学院,北京 100083
社会科学
乡村文化劳动新技术乡村秩序
rural culturelabornew technologiesrural order
《中国劳动关系学院学报》 2026 (4)
89-100,12
评论