肌内效贴对膝骨关节炎干预效果的Meta分析OA
Efficacy of kinesio taping on knee osteoarthritis:a meta-analysis
目的:系统评价肌内效贴(kinesio taping,KT)对膝骨关节炎(knee osteoarthritis,KOA)的干预效果.方法:检索中国知网、维普网、万方数据库、中国生物医学文献服务系统、PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane Library,筛选 KT 治疗 KOA 的随机对照试验,检索时限均为建库至2025 年11 月.肌内效贴组干预措施为 KT 或 KT 联合常规物理治疗,对照组干预措施为安慰贴或常规物理治疗.由 2 名研究者独立筛选文献、提取数据并评价纳入研究的偏倚风险,采用 RevMan5.4.1 软件进行 Meta 分析.结果:共纳入17 项研究,涉及953 例 KOA 患者,其中肌内效贴组485 例、对照组468 例.Meta 分析结果显示,肌内效贴组治疗后膝关节疼痛视觉模拟量表(visual analogue scale,VAS)评分较对照组降低更明显[SMD=-0.87,95%CI(-1.45,-0.28),P=0.003],其中短期贴扎(<4 周)时2 组治疗后膝关节疼痛 VAS 评分改善程度的差异无统计学意义[SMD=-0.52,95%CI(-1.22,0.18),P=0.140],长期贴扎(≥4周)时肌内效贴组治疗后膝关节疼痛VAS 评分较对照组降低更明显[SMD=-1.34,95%CI(-2.44,-0.23),P=0.020];肌内效贴组治疗后西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数评分、起立行走试验时间均较对照组减小更明显[SMD=-0.56,95%CI(-1.05,-0.07),P=0.020;SMD=-0.92,95%CI(-1.78,-0.05),P=0.040];2 组在改善膝关节活动度和股四头肌等速力矩方面的差异均无统计学意义[SMD=0.64,95%CI(-0.04,1.32),P=0.060;SMD=0.91,95%CI(-0.11,1.94),P=0.080].敏感性分析结果提示研究结果较为稳定,发表偏倚分析结果提示可能存在发表偏倚.结论:现有证据表明,KT 可有效缓解 KOA 患者的膝关节疼痛症状、改善膝关节功能,且贴扎 4 周以上的镇痛效果更佳;但其对膝关节活动度和股四头肌肌力的改善作用尚不明确.
Objective:To systematically evaluate the efficacy of kinesio taping(KT)on knee osteoarthritis(KOA).Methods:All the ran-domized controlled trial(RCT)articles on KT for treatment of KOA included from database's inception to November 2025 were retrieved from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure,Vip Database,Wanfang Database,Chinese Biomedical Literature Service System,PubMed,Embase,Web of Science and Cochrane Library.The patients in KT group received KT alone or KT combined with conventional physical therapy,while the ones in control group received placebo taping or conventional physical therapy.The pertinent articles were screened,the data was extracted and the risk of bias of the included researches was assessed independently by two researchers,and then a Meta-analysis was conducted by using RevMan5.4.1 software.Results:A total of 17 RCT articles were included in the final analysis,invol-ving 953 KOA patients,with 485 ones in the KT group and 468 ones in the control group.The results of Meta-analysis revealed that the post-treatment knee pain visual analogue scale(VAS)score decreased more significantly in the KT group compared to the control group(SMD=-0.87,95%CI(-1.45,-0.28),P=0.003).Subgroup analysis revealed that,for short-term taping(<4 weeks),the difference in the improvement of post-treatment knee pain VAS scores between the two groups was not statistically significant(SMD=-0.52,95%CI(-1.22,0.18),P=0.140);whereas,for long-term taping(≥4 weeks),the post-treatment knee pain VAS scores decreased more signifi-cantly in the KT group compared to the control group(SMD=-1.34,95%CI(-2.44,-0.23),P=0.020).Moreover,both the post-treatment Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index(WOMAC)score and the Timed Up and Go(TUG)test time also decreased more significantly in the KT group compared to the control group(SMD=-0.56,95%CI(-1.05,-0.07),P=0.020;SMD=-0.92,95%CI(-1.78,-0.05),P=0.040),however,no significant differences were found between the two groups in improving knee range of motion(ROM)or quadriceps isokinetic torque(SMD=0.64,95%CI(-0.04,1.32),P=0.060;SMD=0.91,95%CI(-0.11,1.94),P=0.080).Sensitivity analysis indicated that the results were relatively stable,and the publication bias analysis suggested a poten-tial risk of publication bias.Conclusion:Available evidences suggest that KT can effectively alleviate knee pain symptoms and improve knee function in KOA patients,with better analgesic effects achieved when taping lasts for 4 weeks or longer.However,its effects on improving knee ROM and quadriceps muscle strength remain unclear.
孙月通;程晓荣;董涣润;许广宇;马依宁;刘金慧;崔梦萱;王敏
山东中医药大学康复医学院,山东 济南 250355山东中医药大学中医药创新研究院,山东 济南 250355康复大学青岛中心医院,山东 青岛 266042山东中医药大学康复医学院,山东 济南 250355山东中医药大学康复医学院,山东 济南 250355山东中医药大学康复医学院,山东 济南 250355山东中医药大学康复医学院,山东 济南 250355山东中医药大学康复医学院,山东 济南 250355
骨关节炎,膝肌内效贴康复物理治疗方法专题Meta分析
osteoarthritis,kneekinesio tapingrehabilitationphysical therapy modalitiesmeta-analysis as topic
《中医正骨》 2026 (5)
35-40,56,7
山东省中医药科技项目(M20241741,M20251718)济南市市校融合发展战略工程项目(JNSX2025014)
评论