首页|期刊导航|中医正骨|不同术式及不同入路对骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折患者经皮椎体强化术后早期疗效的影响

不同术式及不同入路对骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折患者经皮椎体强化术后早期疗效的影响OA

Effects of different surgical procedures and approaches on early postoperative outcomes of percutaneous verte-bral augmentation in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures

中文摘要英文摘要

目的:观察不同术式及不同入路对骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture,OVCF)患者经皮椎体强化(percutaneous vertebral augmentation,PVA)术后早期疗效的影响.方法:纳入 430 例接受经皮椎体成形术(percutaneous vertebroplasty,PVP)或经皮椎体后凸成形术(percutaneous kyphoplasty,PKP)治疗的 OVCF 患者,根据手术方式,将患者分为 PVP 组和 PKP 组;根据手术入路,将患者分为单侧入路组和双侧入路组.分别比较 PVP 组和 PKP 组、单侧入路组和双侧入路组患者术后24 h 时的腰背部疼痛视觉模拟量表(visual analogue scale,VAS)评分、伤椎棘突叩击痛 VAS 评分、改良 Oswestry 功能障碍指数(Oswestry disability index,ODI)及翻身起卧试验阳性率.结果:①不同术式对 OVCF 患者 PVA 术后早期疗效的影响.PVP 组272 例,PKP 组158 例.2 组患者术后24 h 时的腰背部疼痛 VAS 评分、伤椎棘突叩击痛 VAS 评分、改良 ODI 的组间差异均无统计学意义(Z=-0.109,P=0.913;Z=-1.376,P=0.169;Z=-0.642,P=0.521),PKP 组患者术后24 h 时的翻身起卧试验阳性率低于 PVP 组(χ2=20.152,P=0.000).②不同入路对 OVCF 患者 PVA 术后早期疗效的影响.单侧入路组 104 例,双侧入路组326 例;2 组患者骨折时间的差异有统计学意义(χ2=14.429,P=0.006).2 组患者术后 24 h 时的腰背部疼痛 VAS 评分、伤椎棘突叩击痛 VAS 评分、翻身起卧试验阳性率的组间差异均无统计学意义(Z=-0.228,P=0.819;Z=-1.589,P=0.112;χ2=0.172,P=0.679),单侧入路组患者术后24 h 时的改良 ODI 低于双侧入路组(Z=-2.535,P=0.011).回归分析校正骨折时间后,手术入路对 OVCF 患者 PVA 术后24 h 改良 ODI 有显著影响,且单侧入路组患者术后 24 h 时的改良 ODI 低于双侧入路组[β=-6.636,95%CI(-11.129,-2.144),P=0.004].结论:对于 OVCF 患者,PKP 在维持术后早期椎体稳定性、缓解术后早期动态疼痛方面优于 PVP,单侧入路在恢复术后早期胸腰椎功能方面优于双侧入路.

Objective:To evaluate the effects of different surgical procedures and approaches on early postoperative outcomes of percutane-ous vertebral augmentation(PVA)in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture(OVCF).Methods:A total of 430 OVCF pa-tients treated with percutaneous vertebroplasty(PVP)or percutaneous kyphoplasty(PKP)were enrolled in the study.The patients were as-signed into either a PVP group or a PKP group according to the surgical procedure,and categorized into a unilateral approach group and a bilateral approach group based on the surgical approach.The visual analogue scale(VAS)score for low back pain,VAS score for percussion pain over the spinous process of the fractured vertebra,modified Oswestry disability index(ODI),and positive rate of the back pain-inducing test(BPIT)evaluated at 24 hours post-surgery were compared between PVP group and PKP group,as well as between unilateral approach group and bilateral approach group.Results:①Effects of different surgical procedures on early postoperative outcomes of PVA in OVCF pa-tients.Two hundred and seventy-two patients were enrolled in the PVP group,and 158 ones in the PKP group.No significant differences were observed between the two groups in the VAS score for low back pain,VAS score for percussion pain over the spinous process of the fractured vertebra,or modified ODI evaluated at 24 hours post-surgery(Z=-0.109,P=0.913;Z=-1.376,P=0.169;Z=-0.642,P=0.521),however,the positive rate of the BPIT evaluated at 24 hours post-surgery was significantly lower in PKP group compared to PVP group(χ2=20.152,P=0.000).②Effects of different surgical approaches on early postoperative outcomes of PVA in OVCF patients.A to-tal of 104 patients were enrolled in the unilateral approach group,and 326 ones in the bilateral approach group.There was a significant difference in the fracture time between the two groups(χ2=14.429,P=0.006),while,no significant differences were found between the two groups in the VAS score for low back pain,VAS score for percussion pain over the spinous process of the fractured vertebra,or positive rate of the BPIT evaluated at 24 hours post-surgery(Z=-0.228,P=0.819;Z=-1.589,P=0.112;χ2=0.172,P=0.679),however,the modified ODI evaluated at 24 hours post-surgery was lower in unilateral approach group compared to bilateral approach group(Z=-2.535,P=0.011).After adjusting for the fracture time in the regression analysis,the surgical approach had a significant effect on the modified ODI at 24 hours post-surgery,with the unilateral approach group showing a lower modified ODI at 24 hours post-surgery compared to the bilateral approach group(β=-6.636,95%CI(-11.129,-2.144),P=0.004).Conclusion:For patients with OVCF,PKP is superior to PVP in maintaining early postoperative vertebral stability and alleviating early postoperative dynamic pain,while the unilateral approach outperforms the bilateral approach in restoring early postoperative thoracolumbar function.

邓书勤;王亚坤;刘嘉淳;胡军;罗钰鑫;宓保宏;林文平;陈卫衡

广州中医药大学,广东 广州 510006广州中医药大学,广东 广州 510006北京中医药大学第三附属医院,北京 100029北京中医药大学第三附属医院,北京 100029北京中医药大学第三附属医院,北京 100029北京中医药大学第三附属医院,北京 100029深圳平乐骨伤科医院/深圳市坪山区中医院,广东 深圳 518118北京中医药大学第三附属医院,北京 100029

脊柱骨折骨质疏松性骨折骨折,压缩性椎体成形术后凸成型术单侧入路双侧入路

spinal fracturesosteoporotic fracturesfractures,compressionvertebroplastykyphoplastyunilateral approachbilateral approach

《中医正骨》 2026 (5)

24-28,34,6

深圳市"医疗卫生三名工程"项目(SZZYSM202311020)北京中医药大学2025年度基本科研业务费项目(2025-XJ-KYQD-001)

评论