推拿治疗非特异性腰痛临床疗效评价:一项基于随机对照试验的贝叶斯网状Meta分析OA
Clinical efficacy of Tuina therapy for non-specific low back pain:a Bayesian network meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials
目的:采用贝叶斯网络荟萃分析评估推拿治疗非特异性腰痛(NLBP)的疗效和安全性,为临床应用提供可靠的循证依据.方法:在中国知网、中国学术期刊数据库、中国科学引文数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库、PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和Web of Science中全面检索评估推拿治疗NLBP的随机对照试验(RCTs)研究.检索时间范围为各数据库建库日至2025年2月13日.对纳入的研究使用专为RCTs设计的Cochrane风险评估工具评估其偏倚风险.使用Stata 19和R版本4.2.0进行网络荟萃分析.使用均数差(MD)和可信区间(CI)进行统计描述.结果:不同干预措施之间的疗效差异无统计学意义.然而,累积排名下的表面值(SUCRA)提示推拿结合针灸疗效最佳.视觉模拟量表方面,推拿结合常规运动训练的效果明显优于推拿[MD=-1.41;95%CI(-1.92,-0.82)].SUCRA 分析进一步证实,推拿结合常规运动训练在视觉模拟量表评分和Oswestry残疾指数方面均达到了最佳效果,且各干预措施之间未观察到显著差异.结论:研究结果表明,推拿与常规运动训练或针灸相结合治疗NLBP比标准治疗具有显著优势.然而,由于纳入的研究数量有限,需要更多高质量RCTs来进一步验证疗效和安全性的相关发现.
Objective:To assess the efficacy and safety of Tuina(Chinese therapeutic massage)for non-specific low back pain(NLBP)by employing a Bayesian network meta-analysis,with the aim of providing robust evidence-based insights for clinical applications. Methods:A comprehensive search was conducted for randomized controlled trials(RCTs)evaluating Tuina for NLBP across multiple databases,including China National Knowledge Infrastructure,China Science Periodical Database,Chinese Science Citation Database,Chinese Biomedical Literature Database,PubMed,Embase,Cochrane Library,and Web of Science,from each database's inception to February 13,2025.The included studies were assessed for the risk of bias using the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool tailored for RCTs.A network meta-analysis was conducted using Stata 19 and R version 4.2.0.The mean difference(MD)and confidence interval(CI)were used for statistical descriptions. Results:No statistically significant differences were noted in the efficacy among various interventions.However,the surface under the cumulative ranking curve(SUCRA)indicated that the combination of Tuina and acupuncture yielded the most favorable outcomes.Regarding the visual analog scale,Tuina combined with routine exercise training exhibited notable benefits compared with Tuina[MD=-1.41;95%CI(-1.92,-0.82)].SUCRA analysis further confirmed that Tuina combined with routine exercise training achieved optimal outcomes regarding both the visual analog scale score and the Oswestry disability index,but no significant differences were observed among interventions. Conclusion:The findings suggest that combining Tuina with either routine exercise training or acupuncture offers superior benefits over standard treatments for managing NLBP.However,due to the limited number of studies included in this analysis,further high-quality RCTs are warranted to substantiate these findings regarding efficacy and safety.
陈菁;胡庆;胡嘉杰;尹林玉;刘松涛
医药卫生
推拿按摩腰痛随机对照试验贝叶斯分析网络荟萃分析系统评价
TuinaMassageLow Back PainRandomized Controlled TrialsBayesian AnalysisNetwork Meta-analysisSystematic Review
《针灸推拿医学(英文版)》 2026 (3)
300-310,11
This work was supported by Hunan Provincial Clinical Medical Technology Demonstration Base of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain Rehabilitation(湖南省慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛康复临床医疗技术示范基地,No.2023SK4074).
评论