针刺联合神经肌肉刺激治疗颅脑损伤患者临床观察OA
Clinical observation on the combined use of acupuncture and neuromuscular stimulation in the treatment of patients with traumatic brain injury
目的:观察通督醒脑针刺联合神经肌肉刺激治疗颅脑损伤患者的临床疗效及对血流动力学、肢体功能及平衡功能恢复的影响.方法:选取128例脑损伤患者,根据简单随机分组法分为三组,对照组42例予以神经肌肉刺激治疗;针刺组43例,予以通督醒脑针刺治疗;联合组43例,予以通督醒脑针刺联合神经肌肉刺激治疗.连续治疗8周后评估临床疗效,比较三组中医症状评分、肢体功能[Fugl-Meyer评定(FMA)评分]、平衡功能[Berg平衡量表(BBS)]、康复情况[日常生活活动(ADL)评分]、美国国立卫生院中风量表(NIHSS)评分、格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分及血流动力学指标[双侧颈内动脉平均血流速度(Vm)、搏动指数(PI)和收缩期流速峰值(PSV)]的变化情况,并评估治疗安全性.结果:治疗后,联合组总有效率为95.4%,高于对照组和针刺组的76.2%和81.4%(P<0.05);对照组与针刺组对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).治疗前,三组患者神昏不语、面色苍白、喉中痰鸣、软瘫无力、四肢厥冷评分及中医症状总分无统计学差异(P>0.05);治疗后,三组患者的上述评分均较治疗前下降(P<0.05);联合组评分低于对照组和针刺组,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);对照组与针刺组对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).治疗前,三组患者FMA和BBS评分对比无统计学差异(P>0.05);治疗后,三组患者的FMA和BBS评分均较治疗前升高(P<0.05);联合组评分高于对照组和针刺组,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),对照组与针刺组对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).治疗前,三组患者NIHSS、GCS、ADL评分对比无统计学差异(P>0.05);治疗后,三组患者的NIHSS评分均降低,GCS和ADL评分均升高,且联合组NIHSS评分低于对照组和针刺组,GCS、ADL评分高于对照组和针刺组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),对照组与针刺组对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).治疗前,三组患者Vm、PI、PSV对比无统计学差异(P>0.05);治疗后,三组患者的Vm和PI均升高,PSV均降低,组内差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);联合组患者的Vm和PI高于对照组和针刺组,PSV低于对照组和针刺组,组间差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),对照组与针刺组组间对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论:通督醒脑针刺联合神经肌肉刺激治疗颅脑损伤患者疗效优于两种疗法单独使用,且在改善患者血流动力学,提高肢体功能和平衡功能方面更具优势.
Objective:To evaluate the clinical efficacy of the governor vessel-unblocking and mind-refreshing acupuncture method combined with neuromuscular stimulation in treating patients with traumatic brain injury,as well as its effects on hemodynamics,limb function,and balance recovery. Methods:A total of 128 patients with traumatic brain injury were selected and randomly divided into three groups using a simple randomization method.The control group(n=42)received neuromuscular stimulation;the acupuncture group(n=43)received governor vessel-unblocking and mind-refreshing acupuncture;and the combined group(n=43)received governor vessel-unblocking and mind-refreshing acupuncture combined with neuromuscular stimulation.The clinical efficacy was assessed after 8 weeks of continuous treatment,and comparisons were made among the groups regarding the traditional Chinese medicine symptom score,limb function[Fugl-Meyer assessment(FMA)score],balance function[Berg balance scale(BBS)score],recovery status[activities of daily living(ADL)score],National Institutes of Health stroke scale(NIHSS)score,and Glasgow coma scale(GCS)score,as well as hemodynamic parameters[mean blood flow velocity(Vm)in bilateral internal carotid arteries,pulsatility index(PI),and peak systolic velocity(PSV)].Treatment safety was also assessed. Results:After treatment,the total effective rate in the combined group was 95.4%,which was higher than 76.2%and 81.4%in the control group and the acupuncture group,respectively(P<0.05);there was no statistically significant difference between the control group and the acupuncture group(P>0.05).Before treatment,there were no statistically significant differences in the scores for unconsciousness and inability to speak,pallor,wheezing in the throat,flaccid paralysis and weakness,cold extremities,or the total TCM symptom score among the three groups(P>0.05);after treatment,the scores for the aforementioned items in all three groups decreased(P<0.05);the combined group's scores were lower than those of the control and acupuncture groups(P<0.05);there was no statistically significant difference between the control group and the acupuncture group(P>0.05).Before treatment,there were no statistically significant differences in the FMA and BBS scores among the three groups(P>0.05);after treatment,the FMA and BBS scores in all three groups increased(P<0.05);the combined group had higher scores than the control and acupuncture groups,with statistical significance(P<0.05);there were no statistically significant differences between the control group and the acupuncture group(P>0.05).Before treatment,there were no statistically significant differences in the NIHSS,GCS,and ADL scores among the three groups(P>0.05).After treatment,NIHSS scores decreased,and GCS and ADL scores increased in all three groups.The combined group had a lower NIHSS score and higher GCS and ADL scores compared to the control and acupuncture groups,with statistical significance(P<0.05);however,there were no statistically significant differences between the control group and the acupuncture group(P>0.05).Before treatment,there were no statistically significant differences in the Vm,PI,or PSV among the three groups(P>0.05);after treatment,the Vm and PI increased,and the PSV decreased in all three groups,with statistically significant differences within each group(P<0.05);patients in the combined group had higher Vm and PI values and a lower PSV value than those in the control and acupuncture groups;the inter-group differences were all statistically significant(P<0.05);there was no statistically significant difference between the control group and the acupuncture group(P>0.05). Conclusion:The combination of governor vessel-unblocking and mind-refreshing acupuncture and neuromuscular stimulation for the treatment of patients with traumatic brain injury is more effective than either therapy used alone,and demonstrates greater advantages in improving patients'hemodynamics,enhancing limb function,and improving balance.
孙美杰;陈悦;陈子怡
医药卫生
针刺疗法运动活动姿势平衡日常生活活动格拉斯哥昏迷量表脑血管循环颅脑损伤
Acupuncture TherapyMotor ActivityPostural BalanceActivities of Daily LivingGlasgow Coma ScaleCerebrovascular CirculationCraniocerebral Trauma
《针灸推拿医学(英文版)》 2026 (3)
255-262,8
评论