基于层次分析-加权逼近理想解排序法的布地格福吸入气雾剂药物利用评价OA
Drug Utilization Evaluation of Budesonide,Glycopyrronium Bromide and Formoterol Fumarate Inhalation Aerosol Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process-Weighted Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution Method
目的 促进布地格福吸入气雾剂在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)治疗过程中的合理使用.方法 通过医院信息系统抽取医院2025 年 4 月至 9 月接受布地格福吸入气雾剂治疗的COPD住院患者病历 116 份.以相关指南、共识、文献及药品说明书为参考,结合该院临床常见的不合理用药情况,并组建合理用药评价小组,采用德尔菲法进行 2 轮函询,最终建立COPD住院患者布地格福吸入气雾剂的药物利用评价(DUE)标准,采用层次分析(AHP)法对标准中的评价指标进行权重分析,并以加权逼近理想解排序(TOPSIS)法构建各病历合理性评价矩阵,通过对数据进行标准化处理得到最优方案(正理想解)和最劣方案(负理想解),计算各病历与正理想解的相对接近度(Ci)以评价用药合理性.结果 建立了有 7 个一级指标及 9 个二级指标的评价体系,其中适应证、装置操作和患者教育的权重较大,分别为 0.325 9、0.210 5 和 0.136 3.116 份病历平均 Ci值为 0.564 3,其中 6.03%的患者用药合理(0.8≤Ci<1),59.48%的患者用药基本合理(0.6≤Ci<0.8),34.48%的患者用药不合理(Ci<0.6).二级指标评价中禁忌证、给药剂量、装置操作、联合用药方面均无不合理处方.不合理用药主要集中在适应证、患者教育、不良反应监测.结论 采用AHP-加权TOPSIS法构建的布地格福吸入气雾剂DUE标准可用于其临床用药合理性评价.该院COPD住院患者布地格福吸入气雾剂不合理用药问题突出,需加强适应证、患者教育、不良反应监测等的用药监管及干预,以促进合理用药.
Objective To promote the rational use of Budesonide,Glycopyrronium Bromide and Formoterol Fumarate Inhalation Aerosol in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD).Methods A total of 116 medical records of COPD inpatients treated with Budesonide,Glycopyrronium Bromide and Formoterol Fumarate Inhalation Aerosol from April to September 2025 were extracted from the hospital information system.Relevant guidelines,consensuses,literature,and package inserts were used as references,combined with common irrational drug use situations in the hospital.A rational drug use evaluation panel was established,and two rounds of Delphi expert consultation were conducted.Finally,a drug utilization evaluation(DUE)standard for Budesonide,Glycopyrronium Bromide and Formoterol Fumarate Inhalation Aerosol in COPD inpatients was established.The analytic hierarchy process(AHP)was used to analyze the weight of evaluation indicators in the standard,and the weighted technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution(TOPSIS)method was used to construct a rationality evaluation matrix for each medical record.Data standardization was performed to obtain the optimal solution(positive ideal solution)and the worst solution(negative ideal solution),and the relative closeness(Ci)of each medical record to the positive ideal solution was calculated to evaluate drug use rationality.Results An evaluation system consisting of seven first-level indicators and nine second-level indicators was established.Among them,the weights of indication,device operation and patient education were relatively higher,which were 0.325 9,0.210 5 and 0.136 3,respectively.The average Ci value of 116 medical records was 0.564 3,among them,there were 6.03%of patients with rational drug use(0.8≤Ci<1),59.48%with basically rational drug use(0.6≤Ci<0.8),and 34.48%with irrational drug use(Ci<0.6).In the evaluation of second-level indicators,contraindications,dosage,device operation,and combination therapy showed no irrational prescriptions.Irrational drug use was mainly concentrated in indications,patient education,and adverse reaction monitoring.Conclusion The DUE standard for Budesonide,Glycopyrronium Bromide and Formoterol Fumarate Inhalation Aerosol established using the AHP-weighted TOPSIS method can be used for clinical drug use rationality evaluation.The problem of irrational use of Budesonide,Glycopyrronium Bromide and Formoterol Fumarate Inhalation Aerosol in COPD inpatients in this hospital is prominent,and it is necessary to strengthen drug use supervision and intervention in terms of indications,patient education,and adverse reaction monitoring to promote rational drug use.
汤波;陈旭;张华;沈文文;王晓娟
安徽理工大学第一附属医院,安徽 淮南 232007安徽理工大学第一附属医院,安徽 淮南 232007安徽理工大学第一附属医院,安徽 淮南 232007安徽理工大学第一附属医院,安徽 淮南 232007安徽理工大学第一附属医院,安徽 淮南 232007
医药卫生
布地格福吸入气雾剂加权逼近理想解排序法层次分析法慢性阻塞性肺疾病
Budesonide,Glycopyrronium Bromide and Formoterol Fumarate Inhalation Aerosolweighted technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solutionanalytic hierarchy processchronic obstructive pulmonary disease
《中国药业》 2026 (12)
118-122,5
吴阶平医学基金会临床科研专项资助基金[320.6750.2023-25-16].
评论