某院2024年"双通道"外配处方用药合理性分析OA
Analysis of the Rationality of"Dual-Channel"Out-of-Hospital Prescriptions in a Hospital in 2024
目的 为相关管理部门对"双通道"外配处方药品开展全流程精细化管理提供数据参考.方法 通过医院信息系统(HIS)收集重庆市某三级甲等综合医院 2024 年全年门诊"双通道"外配处方 58 043 份,分析外配处方常用科室及常用药品;通过医院合理用药软件调取 2024 年院内处方点评数据 2 551 065 份;并采用医院合理用药系统+药师人工复核的方式对所有处方进行点评,评价处方合理性.结果 外配处方量排名前 3 的科室依次为血液科(8 851 张,15.25%)、肾内科(7 990 张,13.77%)和内分泌科(7 071 张,12.18%);排名前 3 的药物分别为非奈利酮片(5 718 张,9.85%)、琥珀酸地文拉法辛缓释片(5 136 张,8.85%)、地舒单抗注射液(3 456 张,5.95%),属内分泌系统或神经系统用药.外配处方点评不合理处方共计 659 张(700 条),合理率为 98.86%,低于院内供应目录处方的 99.98%.外配不合理处方数量排序依次为给药途径不适宜(376 份,57.06%)、用法用量不适宜(237 份,35.96%)、药物相互作用(46 份,6.98%)和适应证不适宜(41 份,6.22%),且与院内不合理处方的构成存在差异.结论"双通道"的外配处方合理率较高,且达到国家标准,但仍有改进空间.同时较高的处方合理率也提升了"双通道"政策落地的可行性,进一步提高了国家谈判药品的可及性,使更多患者受益.
Objective To provide data reference for relevant management departments to carry out refined management of the entire process of"dual-channel"out-of-hospital prescription drugs.Methods A total of 58 043 outpatient"dual channel"out-of-hospital prescriptions from a tertiary comprehensive hospital in Chongqing for the whole year of 2024 were collected through the hospital information system(HIS),and the commonly used departments and drugs for those prescriptions were analyzed.A total of 2 551 065 prescription review data for 2024 from the hospital's rational drug use software was extracted,and the hospital's rational drug use management system and pharmacist manual review were adopted to evaluate all prescriptions and assess their rationality.Results The top three departments in terms of out-of-hospital prescription volume were Hematology(8 851 prescriptions,15.25%),Nephrology(7 990 prescriptions,13.77%),and Endocrinology(7 071 prescriptions,12.18%);the top three drugs were Finerenone Tablets(5 718 tablets,9.85%),Desvenlafaxine Succinate Sustained-release Tablets(5 136 tablets,8.85%),and Denosumab Injection(3 456 tablets,5.95%),which belonged to endocrine system or nervous system drugs.A total of 659 irrational prescriptions(700 items)were found in the out-of-hospital prescription review,with a rationality rate of 98.86%,which was lower than the 99.98%rationality rate for prescriptions in the hospital's supply catalog.The number of irrational out-of-hospital prescriptions were ranked as follows:inappropriate route of administration(376 prescriptions,57.06%),inappropriate usage and dosage(237 prescriptions,35.96%),drug interactions(46 prescriptions,6.98%),and inappropriate indications(41 prescriptions,6.22%),and there were differences in the composition of irrational prescriptions compared to those in the hospital.Conclusion The rationality rate of"dual-channel"out-of-hospital prescription is relatively high and meets national standards,but there is still room for improvement.Meanwhile,the higher prescription rationality rate also enhances the feasibility of implementing the"dual-channel"policy,further improving the accessibility of drugs negotiated by the country and benefiting more patients.
黄光英;钱火连;顾鹏
中国人民解放军陆军军医大学第二附属医院,重庆 400037中国人民解放军陆军军医大学第二附属医院,重庆 400037中国人民解放军陆军军医大学第二附属医院,重庆 400037
医药卫生
"双通道"药品国家谈判药品外配处方流转处方处方点评合理用药
"dual-channel"drugnational negotiated drugout-of-hospital prescriptionprescription circulationprescription reviewrational drug use
《中国药业》 2026 (12)
31-35,5
重庆市临床药学重点专科建设项目[渝卫办发[2023]2号].
评论