腕部电烧伤二期肌腱移植重建手部功能的临床疗效分析OA
Clinical outcomes of secondary tendon grafting for hand function reconstruction after electrical burns to the wrist
目的 探讨在游离皮瓣成功修复腕部Ⅱ、Ⅲ型电烧伤创面的基础上,二期行肌腱移植重建手部功能的临床疗效.方法 回顾性分析2020 年1 月至2025 年6 月我科收治的20 例腕部电烧伤患者的临床资料.损伤分型:Ⅱ型12 例,Ⅲ型8 例.右侧13 例,左侧7 例.高压电烧伤17 例,低压电烧伤3 例.其中,桡动脉、尺动脉均断裂5 例,至少单侧动脉通畅15 例.受伤至入院时间为4h~37d.均于一期行游离皮瓣移植修复创面且皮瓣完全成活后,二期行肌腱移植重建手部功能.记录患者损伤情况、肌腱缺损长度、移植材料、手术方式及术后康复情况.末次随访采用快速上肢功能障碍评分(QuickDASH 评分)评估手部功能恢复情况,并对4 例行神经移植修复患者采用英国医学研究会(BMRC)评分标准评估感觉功能恢复情况.结果 20 例患者一期游离皮瓣全部成活,二期功能重建于伤后 3~10 个月(平均6.15 个月)进行.肌腱缺损长度6~26 cm,20 例患者均行肌腱移植,共使用肌腱57 根,其中异体肌腱45 根(78.9%),自体肌腱12 根(21.1%).术后14 例(70%)患者因粘连行肌腱松解术,3 例(15%)行肌腱短缩术,2 例(10%)因肌腱断裂而行肌腱缝合修复.行拇指对掌功能重建3 例(15%),腓肠神经移植4 例(20%),掌指关节掌板紧缩术4 例(20%),瘢痕松解术7 例(35%).手术次数1~6 次/例.20 例患者均获随访,随访时间6~48 个月(中位时间18 个月).末次随访上肢功能 QuickDASH 评分为 11~45 分(中位值26 分).4 例行神经移植修复者感觉功能恢复欠理想,两点辨别觉>15 mm,感觉功能恢复为S2~S3 级.结论 腕部电烧伤后二期肌腱移植是恢复手部功能的有效方法,但需建立在一期皮瓣成功修复的基础上.功能重建需序贯多次手术,强调系统性治疗和患者积极配合.对于具备条件的患者,二期功能重建应作为整体治疗的核心组成部分.
Objective To investigate the clinical outcomes of secondary tendon grafting for hand func-tion reconstruction following successful free flap coverage in patients with type Ⅱ and Ⅲ electrical burns to the wrist.Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 20 patients with type Ⅱ and Ⅲ electrical burns to the wrist who were treated in our department from January 2020 to June 2025,including 12 cases of type Ⅱand 8 cases of type Ⅲ.The cohort included 13 right-sided and 7 left-sided injuries;17 cases of high-voltage and 3 cases of low-voltage electrical burns.Both radial and ulnar arteries were disrupted in 5 patients,while at least one artery remained patent in 15 patients.The time from injury to admission ranged from 4 hours to 37 days.All patients underwent successful primary wound coverage with free flaps followed by secondary tendon grafting for hand function reconstruction.Injury characteristics,tendon defect length,graft materials,surgical tech-niques,and postoperative rehabilitation were recorded.Hand function recovery was assessed using the Quick-DASH score at the final follow-up,and sensory function was evaluated in the 4 patients who underwent nerve grafting using the British Medical Research Council(BMRC)grading system.Results All primary free flaps survived successfully in all 20 patients.Secondary functional reconstruction was performed at 3 to 10 months post-injury(mean 6.15 months).All 20 patients underwent tendon grafting.Tendon defect lengths ranged from 6 to26 cm.A total of 57 tendons were used,including45(78.9%)allogeneic tendons and12(21.1%)autolo-gous tendons.Postoperatively,14 patients(70%)underwent tenolysis due to adhesion,3(15%)underwent tendon shortening,and 2(10%)underwent tendon repair due to rupture.Additional procedures included thumb opposition reconstruction in3 patients(15%),sural nerve grafting in 4 patients(20%),metacarpo-phalangeal joint volar plate plication in4 patients(20%),and scar release in7 patients(35%).The number of surgeries per patient ranged from1 to 6.Follow-up duration ranged from6 to 48 months(median 18 months).The median QuickDASH score at final follow-up was 26(range 11 to 45).Sensory recovery was unsatisfactory in the 4 patients who underwent nerve grafting,with two-point discrimination>15 mm,indicating S2 to S3 level nerve function recovery.Conclusions Secondary tendon grafting is an effective approach for restoring hand function after electrical burns to the wrist,but it requires successful primary wound coverage with free flaps.Functional reconstruction necessitates sequential multiple surgeries,emphasizing systematic treatment and active patient cooperation.For eligible patients,secondary functional reconstruction should be considered a core component of the overall treatment strategy.
张颖;王艺雯;赵筱卓;程琳;陈辉;沈余明
首都医科大学附属北京积水潭医院烧伤科,北京 100035首都医科大学附属北京积水潭医院烧伤科,北京 100035首都医科大学附属北京积水潭医院烧伤科,北京 100035首都医科大学附属北京积水潭医院烧伤科,北京 100035首都医科大学附属北京积水潭医院烧伤科,北京 100035首都医科大学附属北京积水潭医院烧伤科,北京 100035
烧伤,电腕损伤肌腱缺损功能重建肌腱移植
burns,electricwrist injuriestendon defectsfunctional reconstructiontendon grafting
《中国现代手术学杂志》 2026 (2)
134-140,7
北京市自然科学基金(L234067)北京积水潭医院院级科研基金(LC202603)
评论