首页|期刊导航|中国输血杂志|酶免检测双试剂反应性核酸初筛无反应性献血者核酸重复检测结果分析

酶免检测双试剂反应性核酸初筛无反应性献血者核酸重复检测结果分析OA

Analysis of repeated nucleic acid test results in blood donors with dual-reactive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay results and nonreactive nucleic acid test results

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 通过分析酶免检测(ELISA)双试剂反应性核酸检测(NAT)初筛无反应性献血者的标本的 NAT 重复检测结果,探讨实验室现有检测模式和检测策略对血液安全的影响.方法 收集 2017-2025 年大连市血液中心ELISA 检测双试剂反应性 NAT 初筛检测无反应性的献血者标本,采用转录介导扩增(TMA)及聚合酶链反应(PCR)2 个系统进行 NAT 重复检测,结合 NAT 重复检测结果的出现次数及检测模式(混检与单检)进行比较分析.结果 共纳入 ELISA 检测双试剂反应性 NAT 初筛无反应性标本 199 份,其中 HBsAg ELISA 反应性标本 66 份、抗-HCV ELISA 反应性标本 130 份、HIV Ag/Ab ELISA 反应性标本 3 份.HBsAg ELISA 反应性标本中,57 份(57/66,86.4%)在 NAT 重复检测中至少出现1 次反应性结果,其中49 份可重复检出≥2 次.HBcAb ECA 反应性标本64 份(64/66,97.0%),无反应性2 份(2/66,3.0%),2 份HBcAb ECA 无反应性标本在NAT 重复检测中均未检出反应性结果.抗-HCV 和 HIV Ag/Ab ELISA 反应性标本未观察到 NAT 的重复检出.TMA 检测系统经 3 次联检和 1 次鉴别检测共检出反应性标本 50 份(50/66,75.8%);PCR 检测系统经 4 次单检共检出反应性标本 51 份(51/66,77.3%).2 个检测系统均检出反应性标本 44 份,仅 TMA 检测系统检出反应性标本 6 份,仅 PCR 检测系统检出反应性标本 7 份.结论 在 ELISA 双试剂反应性 NAT 初筛无反应性的献血者标本中,HBsAg ELISA 反应性标本存在较高比例的低病毒载量感染,HBV DNA 检出呈间歇性及概率性特征.NAT 次数及检测策略对低病毒载量标本的识别具有重要影响.应充分认识 HBV 低病毒载量感染标本的检测特点,以优化血液筛查策略并提高血液安全性.

Objective To investigate the impact of current laboratory testing models and screening strategies on blood safety by analyzing repeat nucleic acid testing(NAT)results obtained from blood donors who had dual-reactive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA)results but were initially nonreactive by NAT.Methods Samples from blood donors with dual-reactive ELISA results and initially nonreactive NAT results collected at Dalian Blood Center from 2017 to 2025 were included.Repeated testing was performed using two NAT systems:transcription-mediated amplification(TMA)and polymerase chain reaction(PCR).The results were analyzed in terms of the frequency of reactive NAT results and the tes-ting strategies,including minipool and individual donation testing.Results A total of 199 samples with dual-reactive ELISA results and initially nonreactive NAT results were included,comprising 66 HBsAg-reactive samples,130 anti-HCV-reactive samples,and 3 HIV Ag/Ab-reactive samples.Among the HBsAg-reactive samples,57(57/66,86.4%)showed at least one reactive NAT result upon repeated testing,and 49 showed two or more repeat reactive results.Anti-HBc was re-active in 64 samples(64/66,97.0%)and nonreactive in 2 samples(2/66,3.0%);both anti-HBc-nonreactive samples remained nonreactive in repeated NAT.No stable repeat nucleic acid reactivity was observed in anti-HCV-or HIV Ag/Ab-reactive samples.The TMA system detected 50 reactive samples(50/66,75.8%)through three combined assays plus one discriminatory assay,whereas the PCR system detected 51 reactive samples(51/66,77.3%)through four rounds of indi-vidual-donation testing.Fortyfour samples were reactive on both systems,6 were reactive only on the TMA system,and 7 were reactive only on the PCR system.Conclusion Among blood donors with dual-reactive ELISA results and initially non-reactive NAT results,HBsAg-reactive samples contain a high proportion of low viral load HBV-related cases,with intermit-tent and probabilistic nucleic acid detectability.Both testing frequency and detection strategy significantly affect the detec-tion of low viral load samples.These findings highlight the importance of recognizing the detection characteristics of low viral load HBV-related samples in order to optimize blood screening strategies and improve blood safety.

臧亮;周磊;刘笑春;孙鹏;范亚欣;梁晓华

大连市血液中心,辽宁 大连 116001大连市血液中心,辽宁 大连 116001大连市血液中心,辽宁 大连 116001大连市血液中心,辽宁 大连 116001大连市血液中心,辽宁 大连 116001大连市血液中心,辽宁 大连 116001

医药卫生

血液筛查核酸检测酶免检测重复检测

blood screeningnucleic acid testingenzyme-linked immunosorbent assayrepeat testing

《中国输血杂志》 2026 (6)

757-761,5

10.13303/j.cjbt.issn.1004-549x.2026.06.008

评论