"亲疏有别"的诚实:内外群体受害者情境中诚实倾向、决策模式对青少年诚实行为的影响OA
"Honesty with Distinction of Closeness and Distance":The Influence of Honesty Tendencies and Decision-Making Modes on Adolescents' Honest Behaviors in In-group and Out-group Victim Situations
目的:考察在内/外群体他人受害情境中,高、低诚实倾向青少年在直觉和理性决策模式下诚实行为反应的差异.方法:通过诚实-谦逊量表和掷骰子任务筛选出高、低诚实倾向者80名,采用2(诚实倾向:高vs低)×2(决策模式:直觉vs理性)×2(情境中受害者类型:内群体vs外群体)混合实验设计,使用"找不同"任务评估青少年诚实度.结果:①在内群体他人受害情境中,高、低诚实倾向青少年在直觉决策模式下的诚实行为均显著多于理性决策模式;②在外群体他人受害情境中,高诚实倾向青少年在直觉决策模式下的诚实行为显著多于理性决策模式;低诚实倾向青少年在直觉决策模式下的诚实行为显著少于理性决策模式.结论:决策模式对高、低诚实倾向青少年诚实行为的影响受到受害者人际距离远近的调节,表现出明显的内群体偏好,受害者效应仅在内群体受害情境中稳定存在.
Objective:To examine the differences in honest behavior between adolescents with high and low honesty tendencies under intuitive and deliberate decision-making modes when dishonest behavior harms different types of victims(in-group/out-group others).Methods:Eighty individuals with high and low honesty tendencies were selected using the Honesty-Humility Scale and the dice-rolling task.A mixed experimental design of 2(honesty tendency:high vs.low)×2(decision-making mode:intuitive vs.deliberate)×2(type of victim in the situation:in-group vs.out-group)was adopted.The"spot-the-difference"task was used to evaluate the honesty of adolescents.Results:(1)In situations where dishonest behavior harms in-group others,adolescents with both high and low honesty tendencies exhibit significantly more honest be-haviors under intuitive decision-making mode than under deliberate decision-making mode.(2)In situations where dishon-est behavior harms out-group others,adolescents with high honesty tendencies exhibit significantly more honest behaviors under intuitive decision-making mode than under deliberate decision-making mode.Conversely,adolescents with low hon-esty tendencies exhibit significantly less honest behavior under intuitive decision-making mode than under deliberate decision-making mode.Conclusion:Decision-making modes influence the honest behaviors of adolescents with high and low honesty tendencies.This influence is moderated by the interpersonal distance to the victim.It reveals a clear in-group preference.The victim effect remains stable only in in-group victimization scenarios.
殷颢文;张鸿来;白学军
南京医科大学康达学院,连云港 222000南京医科大学康达学院,连云港 222000天津师范大学心理学部,天津 300387||教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地天津师范大学心理与行为研究院,天津 300387||天津市学生心理健康与智能评估重点实验室,天津 300387
医药卫生
诚实行为决策模式诚实倾向内外群体受害者情境
Honest behaviorDecision-making modeHonesty tendencyInternal and external groupsVictim situation
《中国临床心理学杂志》 2026 (3)
516-523,8
教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(25JJD190001)江苏省高等教育教改研究课题(2025JGYB505)江苏本科高校人工智能通识课程、基础课程教学改革研究课题(2025ZNT-31)南京医科大学康达学院2025年度科研发展基金重点项目(KD2025KYJJ009).本论文得到江苏高校'青蓝工程'资助.
评论