高边缘性人格特质个体情绪反馈下决策功能异常的计算建模研究OA
A Computational Modeling Study of Decision-Making Function under Emotional Feedback in Individuals with High Borderline Personality Traits
目的:本研究旨在考察高边缘性人格特质(borderline personality traits,BPT)个体在情绪反馈下的决策表现及其潜在认知计算加工过程,揭示情绪反馈对高BPT个体决策功能受损的特异性作用机制.方法:在738名大学生中筛选出142名高BPT及142名低BPT被试,所有被试完成系列心理量表以及爱荷华博弈任务(含情绪反馈变式).计算净分数作为行为指标,并采用效价附加坚持模型估算决策参数(α、λ、A、K、εpos、εneg、c和ω).比较两组在不同反馈类型下的行为学指标与模型参数差异,并在高特质组内考察模型参数与心理量表的偏相关关系.结果:情绪反馈下净分数显著高于非情绪反馈,但两组净分数无显著差异.在决策模型参数上,情绪反馈与非情绪反馈对高BPT个体的决策加工产生了差异性调节作用:在非情绪反馈下,高BPT组α显著低于低BPT组,而该差异在情绪反馈下消失;高BPT组的εneg显著高于低BPT组,且情绪反馈下的εneg与边缘性人格特质得分呈显著正相关.结论:情绪反馈能部分补偿高BPT个体对金钱结果的敏感性缺陷,但无法改善其损失后坚持倾向的异常.
Objective:This study aims to examine decision-making performance and its underlying cognitive computa-tional processes under emotional feedback in individuals with high borderline personality traits(BPT),and to reveal the spe-cific mechanism of emotional feedback on decision-making impairment in these individuals.Methods:A total amount of 142 individuals with high BPT and 142 individuals with low BPT were selected from 738 university students.All partici-pants completed a series of psychological scales and the Iowa Gambling Task,including an emotional-feedback variant.Net score was calculated as the behavioral indicator,and the Valence-Plus-Perseverance model was used to estimate decision-making parameters(α,λ,A,K,εpos,εneg,c,and ω).Behavioral indicators and model parameters were compared between the two groups under different feedback types,and partial correlations between model parameters and psychological-scale scores were examined within the high-BPT group.Results:Net scores were significantly higher under emotional feedback than under non-emotional feedback,whereas no significant difference in net scores was found between the two groups.Re-garding decision-making model parameters,under non-emotional feedback,the α parameter was significantly lower in the high-BPT group than in the low-BPT group,whereas this group difference disappeared under emotional feedback.The εneg parameter was significantly higher in the high BPT group than in the low BPT group,and under emotional feedback,the εneg parameter was significantly positively correlated with borderline personality traits scores.Conclusion:Emotional feedback can partially compensate for the deficit in sensitivity to monetary outcomes in individuals with high BPT,but it fails to ame-liorate their aberrant tendency to persist after losses.
顾晓塽;郑凯莉;唐美倩;程长;黄蓉;卢一凡;蚁金瑶
中南大学湘雅二医院医学心理中心,长沙 410011||中南大学医学心理研究所,长沙 410011中南大学湘雅二医院医学心理中心,长沙 410011||中南大学医学心理研究所,长沙 410011中南大学湘雅二医院医学心理中心,长沙 410011||中南大学医学心理研究所,长沙 410011长沙师范学院学前教育学院,长沙 410100中南大学湘雅二医院医学心理中心,长沙 410011||中南大学医学心理研究所,长沙 410011中南大学湘雅二医院医学心理中心,长沙 410011||中南大学医学心理研究所,长沙 410011中南大学湘雅二医院医学心理中心,长沙 410011||中南大学医学心理研究所,长沙 410011||国家精神心理疾病临床医学中心,长沙 410011
医药卫生
边缘性人格障碍决策功能情绪反馈效价附加坚持模型
Borderline personality disorderDecision-makingEmotional feedbackValence-plus-perseverance model
《中国临床心理学杂志》 2026 (3)
507-515,9
国家自然科学基金(82271573).
评论