首页|期刊导航|中国感染控制杂志|Ⅰ类切口手术部位感染术后不同监测时长感染监测效果评价

Ⅰ类切口手术部位感染术后不同监测时长感染监测效果评价OA

Effectiveness of different postoperative surveillance duration for surgical site infection after class Ⅰ incisional surgery

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 建立Ⅰ类切口手术部位感染(SSI)的出院后监测随访方案,明确最佳随访时限,为有效开展出院后SSI监测提供循证依据.方法 2021年对北京市某三级甲等医院进行前瞻性目标性监测,采用住院监测结合出院后短信及电话随访方式监测SSI,比较仅住院期间监测与联合出院后随访监测的SSI发病率;依据术后1年监测结果,分析术后90 d和30 d监测期的SSI发病率.结果 共纳入34 294例Ⅰ类切口手术患者,骨科占87.95%.仅住院期间监测时,Ⅰ类切口SSI发病率为0.06%;联合出院后随访监测后,以全部监测对象为分母计算的SSI发病率为0.24%,两者比较差异具有统计学意义(χ2=62.02,P<0.001).84例感染病例中,13例SSI发生在住院期间(15.48%),71例(84.52%)发生在出院后;SSI发生的中位时间为术后21 d.71例出院后发生SSI的患者,其出院后至发生SSI中位时间为16 d.手术患者出院后监测时间从术后1年缩短至90 d,将会遗漏3例(3.57%)SSI病例;缩短至30 d,将会遗漏16例(19.05%).出院后监测随访术后90 d与1年的SSI发病率比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.33,P=0.248).结论 建议将特定手术或有植入物手术的SSI监测期缩短至术后90 d,或制定分层监测期策略,使SSI监测工作更加科学、高效,为评估SSI防控措施提供参考和依据.

Objective To establish a post-discharge follow-up surveillance scheme for surgical site infection(SSI)after class I incisional surgery,determine the optimal follow-up duration,and provide evidence-based support for implementing effective post-discharge SSI surveillance.Methods A prospective targeted surveillance was conducted in a tertiary first-class hospital in Beijing City in 2021,SSI was surveilled through inpatient surveillance combined with post-discharge text-message and telephone follow-up,and the incidence of SSI was compared between inpatient surveillance alone and inpatient surveillance combined with post-discharge follow-up surveillance.Based on the 1-year postoperative surveillance results,incidence rates of SSI of the 90-day and 30-day of postoperative surveillance periods were analyzed.Results A total of 34 294 patients undergoing class I incisional surgery were included in the analysis,with orthopedic patients accounting for 87.95%.When only performing inpatient surveillance,the incidence rate of SSI of class I incisional surgery was 0.06%.After combining with post-discharge follow-up surveillance,SSI incidence rate calculated by taking all surveilled objects as the denominator was 0.24%,with a statistically significant difference between the two(χ2=62.02,P<0.001).Among the 84 infected cases,13 cases(15.48%)of SSI occurred during hospitalization,and 71 cases(84.52%)occurred after discharge.The median time for SSI occurrence was 21 days after surgery.Among the 71 patients who developed SSI after discharge,the median time from discharge to SSI occurrence was 16 days.When the surveillance time for surgical patients after discharge shortened from 1 year to 90 days after surgery,3 cases(3.57%)of SSI would be missed;if shortened to 30 days,16 cases(19.05%)would be missed.Post-discharge follow-up surveillance showed that there was no statistically significant difference in SSI incidence between 90-day and 1-year after surgery(χ2=1.33,P=0.248).Conclusion It is recommended to shorten SSI surveillance duration for specific surgeries or implant-related surgeries to 90 days after surgery,or develop a stratified surveillance strategy,so as to make SSI surveillance more scientific and efficient and to provide reference and basis for evaluating SSI prevention and control measures.

任燕;李红;魏洪鑫;李璐瑶;刘爽;杨琳;单娇;刘悦;陈丽红;陈辉

首都医科大学附属北京积水潭医院 医院感染管理处,北京 100035首都医科大学附属北京积水潭医院 医院感染管理处,北京 100035首都医科大学附属北京积水潭医院 医院感染管理处,北京 100035首都医科大学附属北京积水潭医院 医院感染管理处,北京 100035首都医科大学附属北京积水潭医院 医院感染管理处,北京 100035首都医科大学附属北京积水潭医院 医院感染管理处,北京 100035首都医科大学附属北京积水潭医院 医院感染管理处,北京 100035首都医科大学附属北京积水潭医院 医院感染管理处,北京 100035首都医科大学附属北京积水潭医院 医院感染管理处,北京 100035首都医科大学附属北京积水潭医院 烧伤整形与创面修复科,北京 100035

医药卫生

Ⅰ类切口手术部位感染监测随访出院后

class Ⅰ incisionsurgical site infectionsurveillancefollow-uppost-discharge

《中国感染控制杂志》 2026 (6)

841-847,7

北京市卫健委高层次公共卫生技术人才培养计划(学科骨干-1-008)首都卫生发展科研专项基金资助项目(首发2024-1G-2071)首都卫生发展科研专项基金资助项目(首发2024-2G-2072)

10.12138/j.issn.1671-9638.20263128

评论