糖尿病动态临床实践指南系列研究之三:中国2型糖尿病临床实践指南证据等级和推荐意见分级方法学特征分析OA
Research on living clinical practice guidelines in diabetes mellitus Ⅲ:methodological characteristics analysis of recommendations classification and evidence grading in the Chinese clinical practice guidelines for type 2 diabetes mellitus
目的 调查中国2型糖尿病(T2DM)临床实践指南证据等级和(或)推荐意见分级现状,为提升我国糖尿病指南方法学质量提供参考.方法 计算机检索2010年1月1日至2025年7月1日国内外期刊公开发表的中国成人T2DM临床实践指南/共识(以下简称为"指南"),筛选文献并提取相关信息,采用Excel 2024软件进行描述性分析,Origin 2024软件绘图.结果 共纳入118篇中国T2DM指南,其中仅49篇(41.5%)进行了证据等级和(或)推荐意见分级,涉及分级方法可归纳为7种,其中推荐意见分级评价、制订与评估(GRADE)分级系统应用最多;证据等级分级描述多采用字母和4级分类,而推荐意见分级描述多采用文字和2级分类.10篇(8.5%)指南证据等级和推荐意见分级均采用GRADE分级系统,包含382条推荐意见,其中337条(88.2%)推荐意见报告了证据等级和推荐意见分级.结论 中国T2DM指南数量呈增长趋势,GRADE分级系统使用频次逐渐提高,但需夯实指南证据基础、规范分级标准,以便为临床决策提供参考,推动指南科学发展.
Objective To investigate the current status of evidence grading and/or recommendation classification in clinical practice guidelines for type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM)in China,and to provide references for improving the methodological quality of domestic diabetes guidelines.Methods The publicly released clinical practice guidelines/consensus(hereofter referred to as the guidelines)for adult T2DM in China published in domestic and international journals from January 1,2010 to July 1,2025 were systematically searched to screen the literature and extract data.Descriptive analysis was performed using Excel 2024,and visualized charts were generated with Origin 2024.Results A total of 118 Chinese T2DM guidelines were included,of which only 49(41.5%)reported evidence grading and/or classes of recommendation,and 7 classification methods were summarized.The Grading of Recommendations Assessment,Development and Evaluation(GRADE)system was the most widely applied tool.Evidence grading was mostly presented by letters and four-level classification,while recommendation classification was mainly described in text with two-level classification.Ten guidelines(8.5%)adopted the GRADE system for both evidence and recommendation grading,covering 382 recommendations,of which 337(88.2%)reported both evidence grading and recommendation grading.Conclusion The number of Chinese T2DM guidelines shows an increasing trend,and the application frequency of the GRADE system has gradually increased.Nevertheless,it is necessary to consolidate the evidence base and standardize classification criteria of guidelines,and to facilitate clinical decision-making and promote the standardized and scientific development of domestic guidelines.
伍阿姣;唐俊;蔡丰翼;解驰;王诗淳;王永博;阎思宇;黄桥;任相颖;靳英辉
武汉大学公共卫生学院(武汉 430071)||武汉大学中南医院循证与转化医学中心(武汉 430071)武汉大学中南医院内分泌科(武汉 430071)武汉大学第一临床学院(武汉 430060)武汉大学公共卫生学院(武汉 430071)||武汉大学中南医院循证与转化医学中心(武汉 430071)武汉大学中南医院循证与转化医学中心(武汉 430071)武汉大学中南医院循证与转化医学中心(武汉 430071)武汉大学中南医院循证与转化医学中心(武汉 430071)武汉大学中南医院循证与转化医学中心(武汉 430071)武汉大学中南医院循证与转化医学中心(武汉 430071)武汉大学中南医院循证与转化医学中心(武汉 430071)
医药卫生
2型糖尿病临床实践指南证据等级推荐意见分级
Type 2 diabetes mellitusClinical practice guidelinesEvidence gradingGrade of recommendation
《医学新知》 2026 (6)
605-610,6
国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(82505373)武汉大学中南医院院级青年交叉学科专项基金(ZNQNTC2023006)
评论