首页|期刊导航|现代医药卫生|目标导向液体治疗对冠状动脉搭桥术后凝血-纤溶系统的影响

目标导向液体治疗对冠状动脉搭桥术后凝血-纤溶系统的影响OA

Effect of goal-directed fluid therapy on the coagulation-fibrinolysis system after coronary artery bypass grafting

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 观察目标导向液体治疗(GDFT)对冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)患者术后凝血-纤溶系统的影响.方法 选取河南大学第一附属医院2022年8月至2025年3月收治的120例冠心病患者开展前瞻性临床对照试验.通过随机数字表法将患者分为常规组和导向组,每组60例.2组患者均实施非体外循环下CABG治疗,常规组患者术中实施常规液体治疗,导向组患者术中实施目标导向液体治疗,比较2组患者围手术期血流动力学指标、容量负荷指标、凝血-纤溶系统功能指标及并发症发生情况.结果 经治疗后,导向组患者术中1 h(T2)、术毕(T3)时的心输出量、心脏指数均高于常规组,差异均有统计学意义(t=3.025、3.076、9.885、8.884,P<0.05).导向组患者T2、T3 时左心室舒张末期容积、左心室收缩末期容积均低于常规组,差异均有统计学意义(t=2.645、3.762、3.021、2.971,P<0.05).导向组患者术后活化部分凝血酶时间、凝血酶原时间、D-二聚体[分别为(30.66±5.47)s、(13.23±3.29)s、(0.36±0.19)mg/L],均低于常规组[分别为(33.72±5.35)s、(15.29±3.62)s、(0.83±0.16)mg/L];纤维蛋白原[(1.58±0.26)g/L]高于常规组[(0.94±0.19)g/L],差异均有统计学意义(t=3.098、3.262、14.657、15.395,P<0.05).截至随访结束时,导向组患者并发症发生率[8.33%(5/60)]低于常规组[23.33%(14/60)],差异有统计学意义(χ2=5.065,P=0.024).结论 GDFT能稳定非体外循环下CABG患者围手术期血流动力学及心脏容量负荷,对维持患者凝血-纤溶系统功能并降低不良预后发生风险均有积极影响.

Objective To observe the effect of goal-directed fluid therapy(GDFT)on the coagulation-fi-brinolysis system in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting(CABG).Methods A prospective controlled clinical trial was conducted with 120 patients with coronary heart disease admitted to The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University from August 2022 to March 2025.Patients were randomly divided into a con-ventional group and a GDFT group using a random number table,with 60 cases in each group.Both groups un-derwent off-pump CABG.During surgery,the conventional group received conventional fluid therapy,while the GDFT group received goal-directed fluid therapy.Perioperative hemodynamic parameters,volume load in-dicators,coagulation-fibrinolysis system function indices,and the incidence of complications were compared between the two groups.Results After treatment,the cardiac output and cardiac index in the GDFT group were significantly higher than those in the conventional group at intraoperative 1 h(T2)and at the end of sur-gery(T3),the differences were statistically significant(t=3.025,3.076,9.885,8.884,P<0.05).The left ven-tricular end-diastolic volume and left ventricular end-systolic volume in the GDFT group were lower than those in the conventional group at T2 and T3,the difference were statistically significant(t=2.645,3.762,3.021,2.971,P<0.05).Postoperative activated partial thromboplastin time,prothrombin time,and D-dimer in the GDFT group were(30.66±5.47)s,(13.23±3.29)s,and(0.36±0.19)mg/L,respectively,which were lower than those in the conventional group[(33.72±5.35)s,(15.29±3.62)s,(0.83±0.16)mg/L,respec-tively],while the fibrinogen level[(1.58±0.26)g/L]was higher than that in the conventional group[(0.94±0.19)g/L],the differences were statistically significant(t=3.098,3.262,14.657,15.395,P<0.05).By the end of follow-up,the complication rate[8.33%(5/60)]in the GDFT group was lower than 23.33%(14/60)in the conventional group,the difference was statistically significant(χ2=5.065,P=0.024).Conclusion GDFT can stabilize perioperative hemodynamics and cardiac volume load in patients undergoing off-pump CABG,and has positive effects on maintaining coagulation-fibrinolysis system function and reducing the risk of adverse prognosis.

岳静;曹佩佩;冯永飞;潘丽红

河南大学第一附属医院心血管外科,河南 开封 475001河南大学第一附属医院心血管外科,河南 开封 475001河南大学第一附属医院心血管外科,河南 开封 475001河南大学第一附属医院心血管外科,河南 开封 475001

医药卫生

冠状动脉搭桥术目标导向液体治疗血流动力学容量负荷凝血-纤溶系统

Coronary artery bypass graftingGoal-directed fluid therapyHemodynamicsVol-ume loadCoagulation-fibrinolysis system

《现代医药卫生》 2026 (6)

1221-1224,1228,5

河南省卫生健康委员会医学科技攻关项目(LHGJ20200552).

10.3969/j.issn.1009-5519.2026.06.004

评论