首页|期刊导航|现代情报|知识融合视角下人机协同效用测度研究

知识融合视角下人机协同效用测度研究OACHSSCD

Research on the Measurement of Human—AI Collaboration Utility From the Perspective of Knowledge Integration

中文摘要英文摘要

[目的/意义]回应数智环境下情报工作从信息组织向智慧服务演进的核心议题,本文旨在探索知识融合视角下人机协同效用测度问题.[方法/过程]基于认知—情感—行为(CAB)模型,从3个维度构建知识融合视角下人机协同效用测度的理论模型.测度方法采用改进的AHPSort Ⅱ方法,以非线性动态分类,更适应人机协同的复杂场景.[结果/结论]建立由18个一级指标和44个二级指标构成的理论模型,实证结果显示在复杂场景中具备良好效能.从知识融合与流动的内在机制出发,揭示了面向复杂情报环境下普遍存在的"知识流动断层"与"动态信息适应不足"两大核心问题.

[Purpose/Significance]In today's digital and intelligent era,human-AI collaboration has become not just a technical idea but a national strategic priority.Yet most current research still focuses on technology and efficiency,over-looking the deeper issues of how knowledge is integrated,how humans and AI build shared understanding,and how emo-tions shape their interactions.To fill this gap,this study develops a way to measure the real value of human-AI collabora-tion from a knowledge integration perspective,aiming to uncover what actually happens in the process black box and address common problems like knowledge flow breakdowns and poor adaptation to changing situations.[Method/Process]We built a three-dimensional model based on the Cognitive-Affective-Behavioral framework to break down the process of knowledge integration in human-AI collaboration.We then turned this model into an evaluation system with 18 first-level and 44 second-level indicators,covering cognitive interaction,emotional adaptation,and behavioral coordination between humans and AI.To assess collaboration utility,we used an improved AHPSort Ⅱ method.We introduced interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets to handle uncertainty in expert judgments and added a conflict resolution factor to help experts with different backgrounds reach agreement.We also incorporated a logistic function to better capture the nonlinear nature of collaboration,especially when factors like trust build up gradually.We tested the framework on a high-tech manufacturing company.We collected data from company reports,expert evaluations through a Delphi survey,and industry benchmarks.We calculated indicator weights,processed mixed data with the enhanced AHPSort Ⅱ method,and determined the overall collaboration level.[Result/Conclusion]The results place the company's human-AI collaboration at a highly synergistic level.But a closer look reveals an imbalance:efficiency and innovation score high,while synergy and risk control score much lower.This points to a collaborative void-interactions between humans and AI stay superficial,lacking deep know-ledge fusion or real cognitive alignment.Our framework proves useful in identifying such specific bottlenecks.The study makes three main contributions.First,it offers a holistic way to understand human-AI collaboration through the lens of knowledge integration,moving beyond single-dimension views.Second,it provides a practical method that combines an enhanced AHPSort Ⅱ with fuzzy set techniques to handle mixed data and dynamic classification.Third,it gives organiza-tions actionable insights to move human-AI interaction beyond simple tool use toward truly intelligent and synergistic team-work.Future work could focus on making the model more adaptive through self-learning algorithms and testing it across diffe-rent industries and cultural settings.

周昕;李东晋;刘逸伦

吉林大学商学与管理学院,吉林 长春 130012吉林大学商学与管理学院,吉林 长春 130012吉林大学商学与管理学院,吉林 长春 130012

社会科学

知识融合人机协同效用认知—情感—行为模型AHPSortⅡ评价测度

knowledge integrationhuman-AI collaboration utilityCognitive-Affective-Behavioral(CAB)modelAHPSort Ⅱevaluation and measurement

《现代情报》 2026 (7)

17-29,13

10.3969/j.issn.1008-0821.2026.07.002

评论