首页|期刊导航|西安石油大学学报(社会科学版)|监检衔接中被调查人言词证据层级转化规则之构建

监检衔接中被调查人言词证据层级转化规则之构建OACHSSCD

Construction of Hierarchical Transformation Rules of the Investigated Person's Verbal Evidence in the Connection of Supervision and Inspection

中文摘要英文摘要

"程序二元证据一体"框架下,监察证据与刑事证据的衔接成为检验新时期监检关系的重要标准.基于"认识-价值"二元论的证据哲学立场,监检衔接中被调查人言词证据的混同衔接模式存在重效率、轻程序的弊端,过分强调反腐高效的作用,忽视了程序正义和人权保障等价值的实现.因此,构建一套被调查人言词证据的层级转化规则以化解认识与价值之间的矛盾显得尤为重要.内部转化层面,初核阶段言词证据遵循"原则禁止+特殊转化"的模式,证据类型上形成"违纪类证据禁止转化、违法类证据限制转化和犯罪类证据直接准入"的层级转化规则.外部衔接层面,以审判为中心视角下完善检察提前介入和言词证据审查双轨模式,程序正义视野下健全言词证据的过程性审查和非法排除证据规则,以实现发现真实和价值保障的双重目的,提升反腐质效.

Under the framework of"integration of procedural dual evidence",the connection between su-pervision evidence and criminal evidence has become an important standard to test the relationship between su-pervision and inspection in the new era.From the perspective of evidence philosophy based on the"recogni-tion-value"dualism,the mixed connection mode of the verbal evidence of the investigated person in the super-vision and inspection connection process has the drawbacks of emphasizing efficiency over procedure,overly emphasizing the role of efficient anti-corruption,and neglecting the realization of values such as procedural jus-tice and human rights protection.Therefore,it is particularly important to establish a set of hierarchical transfor-mation rules for the verbal evidence of the respondents in order to resolve the contradiction between cognition and value.At the internal transformation level,the verbal evidence in the initial nuclear stage follows the mode of"prohibited in principle+special transformation",and the hierarchical transformation rules of"prohibited transformation of disciplinary evidence,restricted transformation of illegal evidence,and direct access of crimi-nal evidence"are formed in the type of evidence.At the external cohesion level,the dual-track model of prose-cutorial intervention in advance and verbal evidence review should be perfected from the perspective of trial as the center,and the procedural review and illegal exclusion rules of verbal evidence should be improved from the perspective of procedural justice,so as to realize the dual value of discovering truth and value protection,and improve the quality effect of anti-corruption.

刘东叙;许光旺

山东大学 法学院,山东 青岛 266237江西省横峰县检察院,江西 上饶 334300

社会科学

言词证据"认识-价值"二元论层级转化监检衔接

verbal evidence"knowledge-value"dualismhierarchical transformationsupervision and in-spection connection

《西安石油大学学报(社会科学版)》 2026 (3)

115-124,10

山东省社会科学规划"平安山东法治山东建设研究"专项研究成果(25CFZJ06).

评论