张载本体论衡论OACHSSCD

The Balanced Study on Zhang Zai's Ben Ti Theory

中文摘要英文摘要

关于张载本体论的争论,"气本论""虚本论"等形态之争是其表象,而据以立论的宇宙论、体用论之思维模式之别方为实质.两种思维模式与"本体论"的对译词"Ontology"混淆颇深.只有厘清 Ontology、宇宙论、体用论三种思维模式的边界,才能在张载本体论问题的探索上取得更大突破.基于宇宙论的"气本论"与基于体用论的"虚本论"各有可取之处,也各有问题亟待阐明.宇宙论是理解张载本体论的主要框架,Ontology在张载思想中有迹可循而不占据根本地位.

The debate of Zhang Zai's Ben Ti theory,such as the theory of"Qi Ben Theory"and"Xu Ben Theory"and other forms of contentioin,is its appearance,while the differences of thinking mode of cosmology and theory of substance and function are its essence.Two modes of thinking are confused with the translation of"Ontology".Only by clarifying the boundaries among the three thinking modes-Ontology,Cosmology,and Theo-ry of Function and Essence,can we achieve greater breakthroughs in the exploration of Zhang Zai's Ben Ti Tho-ery.The theory of Qi Ben based on cosmology and the theory of Xu Ben based on theory of substance and func-tion have their merits and problems to be clarified.Cosmology serves as the main framework for understanding Zhang Zai's Ben Ti Theory.Ontology can be found in Zhang Zai's thoughts but does not hold a fundamental po-sition.

孟驱洋

西北大学 中国思想文化研究所,陕西 西安 710127

社会科学

张载本体论Ontology宇宙论体用论

Zhang ZaiBen Ti TheoryOntologyCosmologyTheory of Substance and Function

《西安石油大学学报(社会科学版)》 2026 (3)

90-96,7

国家社会科学基金重大项目"中国道论思想通史编纂与研究"(25&ZD017)陕西省教育厅项目"关学文化资源融入陕西高校思政课研究"(25JK0262)西北大学研究生科研创新项目"诸子视野与韩非公私观特质研究"(CX2026047).

评论