黄土丘陵区切沟侵蚀发育过程中土壤侵蚀阻力变化OA
Variations in Soil Erosion Resistance during Gully Development in the Hilly and Gully Regions of the Loess Plateau
[目的]切沟形态特征是量化切沟侵蚀发育的重要参数,其演变过程受制于水流剪切力与土壤侵蚀阻力之间的动态平衡.然而,切沟侵蚀发育过程中土壤侵蚀阻力在切沟不同部位如何随发育阶段演变并反馈于形态演化,还缺乏系统的量化研究.[方法]以黄土丘陵区典型坡面切沟为研究对象,结合野外调查与室内分析,系统比较不同发育阶段(前、中、后期)、沟道形态(宽型、窄型)及发育部位(沟头、沟壁、沟底)的土壤侵蚀阻力特征.[结果]随切沟发育,土壤临界剪切力(τc)显著上升[发育前、中、后期分别为(2.19±1.39)、(3.11±1.92)、(3.62±2.77)Pa],而细沟可蚀性(kd)显著下降[发育前、中、后期分别为(320.46±424.21)、(121.28±145.99)、(51.20±36.93)cm3/(N·s)],表明发育后期土壤侵蚀阻力显著增强.随机森林模型揭示,此增强过程主要与土壤与根系属性演变有关,有机质含量是影响τc与kd的共同关键因子;τc的提升与根重密度密切相关,而kd的降低则主要得益于团聚体稳定性的增加.表明切沟发育过程中的土壤结构重建与根系发育,共同促进土壤侵蚀阻力的总体提高.此演变趋势在空间上呈现显著分异,不同地貌部位的土壤侵蚀阻力差异显著,表现为沟头τc最高[(4.59±2.21)Pa]、kd最低[(44.81±25.79)cm3/(N·s)],沟壁τc最低[(1.34±0.61)Pa)],kd最高[(380.06±406.89)cm3/(N·s)],沟底居中,反映沟壁坍塌与沟底下切是主要的活跃侵蚀形式.沟道形态在此基础上进一步调节侵蚀阻力的时空格局,相比于宽型沟,窄型沟具有更高的kd和更低的τc,表现出更强的侵蚀敏感性.线性混合效应模型从发育阶段、地貌部位和沟道形态等宏观地貌因子视角量化土壤侵蚀阻力的变异来源,结果表明,三者共同解释kd的52.2%和τc的58.2%变异,且发育阶段与地貌部位存在极显著交互作用(p<0.001),说明土壤侵蚀阻力随切沟发育在不同部位表现出差异化响应,并受沟道形态调节.综合来看,发育阶段决定土壤与根系属性演化的总体趋势,地貌部位和沟道形态通过塑造局地水动力与物源条件调节此演化过程,共同控制土壤侵蚀阻力的时空格局.[结论]研究揭示切沟发育与土壤侵蚀阻力耦合的定量规律,为黄土丘陵区侵蚀沟防控与生态修复提供科学依据.
[Objective]Gully morphological characteristics are key parameters for quantifying gully erosion development,and its evolution is governed by the dynamic balance between hydraulic shear stress and soil erosion resistance.However,a systematic quantitative understanding is lacking regarding how soil erosion resistance evolves at different gully positions with developmental stages and feeds back to morphological evolution during gully erosion development.[Methods]This study investigated typical gullies on slopes in the loess hilly region.Field surveys and laboratory analyses were conducted to systematically compare soil erosion resistance characteristics across different developmental stages(early,middle,late),gully morphologies(wide,narrow),and positions(head,wall,floor).[Results]As gully development progressed,critical shear stress(τc)of soil significantly increased from(2.19±1.39)Pa in the early stage to(3.11±1.92)Pa in the middle stage and to(3.62±2.77)Pa in the late stage.Rill erodibility(kd)significantly declined from(320.46±424.21)cm3/(N·s)in the early stage to(121.28±145.99)cm3/(N·s)in the middle stage and to(51.20±36.93)cm3/(N·s)in the late stage,indicating that soil erosion resistance was significantly enhanced in the later stage of development.Random forest model revealed this enhancement was primarily related to changes in soil and root properties,with soil organic matter content being a key factor influencing both τc and kd.The increase in τc was closely associated with root weight density,while the decrease in kd was mainly attributed to increasing aggregate stability.These patterns suggested that soil structure reconstruction and root development during gully development jointly contributed to the overall increase in soil erosion resistance.This evolution trend exhibited significant spatial differentiation,with pronounced differences in soil erosion resistance across different geomorphological positions.Gully head showed the highest τc[(4.59±2.21)Pa]and lowest kd[(44.81±25.79)cm3/(N·s)],gully wall had the lowest τc[(1.34±0.61)Pa]and highest kd[(380.06±406.89)cm3/(N·s)],and gully floor displayed intermediate values.These values indicated that wall collapse and floor incision were the primary active erosion modes.Gully morphology further regulated the spatiotemporal pattern of erosion resistance.Compared to wide gullies,narrow gullies exhibited higher kd and lower τc,suggesting greater sensitivity to erosion.Linear mixed-effects modelling quantified the sources of variation in soil erosion resistance from the perspective of macro-geomorphological factors such as developmental stage,geomorphological position,and gully morphology.The results showed that these three factors jointly explained 52.2%of kd and 58.2%of τcvariation,with a significantly pronounced interaction between developmental stage and geomorphological position(p<0.001).These findings demonstrated that soil erosion resistance exhibited differentiated responses at different positions as gully development progressed and was conditioned by gully morphology.Overall,the developmental stage determined the overall trend of soil and root property evolution,whereas geomorphological position and gully morphology modulated this evolution by shaping local hydrodynamics and provenance conditions,thereby jointly controlling the spatiotemporal pattern of soil erosion resistance.[Conclusion]This study reveals the quantitative law of the coupling between gully development and soil erosion resistance,providing a scientific basis for gully erosion control and ecological restoration in the loess hilly region.
王琼;常恒;范锐;张毅;胡雨点;方怒放
西北农林科技大学水土保持科学与工程学院(水土保持研究所),水土保持与荒漠化整治全国重点实验室,陕西杨凌 712100西北农林科技大学水土保持科学与工程学院(水土保持研究所),水土保持与荒漠化整治全国重点实验室,陕西杨凌 712100西北农林科技大学水土保持科学与工程学院(水土保持研究所),水土保持与荒漠化整治全国重点实验室,陕西杨凌 712100中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所,陕西杨凌 712100西北农林科技大学水土保持科学与工程学院(水土保持研究所),水土保持与荒漠化整治全国重点实验室,陕西杨凌 712100西北农林科技大学水土保持科学与工程学院(水土保持研究所),水土保持与荒漠化整治全国重点实验室,陕西杨凌 712100||中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所,陕西杨凌 712100
农业科技
沟道侵蚀临界剪切力细沟可蚀性沟道形态发育阶段黄土高原
gully erosioncritical shear stressrill erodibilitygully morphologydevelopmental stageLoess Plateau
《水土保持学报》 2026 (3)
130-139,10
国家自然科学基金项目(42177335)陕西省自然科学基础研究计划项目(2024ZY-JCYJ-02-18)
评论