首页|期刊导航|水生态学杂志|基于可解释机器学习的美国纽约州湖泊水华频率和风险驱动因素分析

基于可解释机器学习的美国纽约州湖泊水华频率和风险驱动因素分析OA

Analysis of Harmful Algal Bloom Frequency and Risk Drivers in New York State Lakes,USA:A Study Based on Explainable Machine Learning

中文摘要英文摘要

揭示湖泊水华频率和风险的驱动因素,为湖泊水华控制提供科学方法.以美国纽约州113个湖泊为对象,选用2018和2019年6-9月调查数据,以水质指标、营养类型、湖泊形态和流域土地利用类型为影响因素,以水华频率类型和水华风险类型为预测目标,训练机器学习(machine learning,ML)模型,通过Shapley加和解释(shapley additive explanation,SHAP)和部分依赖图(partial dependence plot,PDP)对影响因素进行重要性排序和ML模型解释.研究结果表明:(1)Random Forest算法构建的ML模型对水华频率类型和水华风险类型分类较准确,准确率分别为0.859和0.923,AUC值分别为0.945和0.988.ML模型在分类任务中表现优异(roc auc score接近1),具有较高的预测准确性和泛化能力.(2)土地利用类型(林地、农业用地和城市和居民用地)是不同水华频率类型湖泊重要的影响因素.林地是水华频繁型湖泊最重要影响因素,SHAP均值为0.55;农业用地是无水华型湖泊最重要影响因素,SHAP均值为0.30;城市和居民用地对水华周期型湖泊影响最大,SHAP均值为0.20.(3)对不同湖泊水华风险类型分析,营养状态是低、中等和高水华风险湖泊最重要影响特征,SHAP均值分别为0.12、0.07和0.05.另外,营养状态对水华风险类型影响具有"阈值效应".

Lake algal blooms have negative impacts on human health and aquatic ecosystems,making their control and management crucial.In this study,113 lakes across New York State,USA were selected for research,and we explored the occurrence frequency of algal blooms and the factors driving risk,aim-ing to provide a feasible method for controlling harmful algal blooms(HABs).The study was based on lake survey data from June to September of 2018 and 2019.Water quality indicators,nutrient types,lake morphology,and watershed land use were selected as influencing factors,and algal bloom frequency types and algal bloom risk types were used as prediction targets to train machine learning(ML)models.The Shapley Additive Explanation(SHAP)and Partial Dependence Plot(PDP)were employed to rank the importance of influencing factors and interpret the ML models.Results show that the ML model based on the Random Forest algorithm achieved the highest accuracy in classifying algal bloom frequency types and risk types,with accuracy scores of 0.859 and 0.923,and AUC(Area Under the Curve)scores of 0.945 and 0.988,respectively.The ML model demonstrated excellent performance in classification tasks(ROC AUC score close to 1),exhibiting high predictive accuracy and generalization ability.Land use types(for-estland,agricultural land,and urban/residential land)were identified as significant influencing factors for lakes with different algal bloom frequency types.Forestland was the most important factor for lakes with frequent algal blooms,with a SHAP mean value of 0.55;agricultural land was the most important factor for lakes with no algal blooms,with a SHAP mean value of 0.30;and urban/residential land had the larg-est impact on lakes with periodic algal blooms,with a SHAP mean value of 0.20.For different algal bloom risk types,nutrient status was the most important influencing factor for low,medium,and high-risk lakes,with SHAP mean values of 0.12,0.07,and 0.05,respectively.Additionally,the impact of nutrient status on algal bloom risk types exhibited a"threshold effect".

刘冰;孙海杰;叶晓语;时凯歌;刘辉;卢鑫;韩帅军;古励

郑州师范学院化学化工学院,河南郑州 450044||河南省煤基苯绿色催化原子经济性转化工程技术研究中心,河南郑州 450044郑州师范学院化学化工学院,河南郑州 450044||河南省煤基苯绿色催化原子经济性转化工程技术研究中心,河南郑州 450044郑州师范学院化学化工学院,河南郑州 450044||河南省煤基苯绿色催化原子经济性转化工程技术研究中心,河南郑州 450044郑州师范学院化学化工学院,河南郑州 450044||河南省煤基苯绿色催化原子经济性转化工程技术研究中心,河南郑州 450044郑州师范学院化学化工学院,河南郑州 450044||河南省煤基苯绿色催化原子经济性转化工程技术研究中心,河南郑州 450044郑州师范学院化学化工学院,河南郑州 450044||河南省煤基苯绿色催化原子经济性转化工程技术研究中心,河南郑州 450044郑州师范学院化学化工学院,河南郑州 450044||河南省煤基苯绿色催化原子经济性转化工程技术研究中心,河南郑州 450044重庆大学环境与生态学院,重庆 400044

资源环境

机器学习湖泊水华频率水华风险可解释性

machine learninglakealgal bloom frequencyalgal bloom riskexplainability

《水生态学杂志》 2026 (4)

118-130,13

国家自然科学基金项目(51208448)河南省高等学校重点科研项目(24B610016)河南省科技厅科技攻关项目(262102320243).

10.15928/j.1674-3075.202412160001

评论