首页|期刊导航|世界核地质科学|基于多种机器学习方法的SASI航空高光谱数据蚀变矿物填图研究

基于多种机器学习方法的SASI航空高光谱数据蚀变矿物填图研究OA

Alteration mineral mapping from airborne hyperspectral SASI data using multiple machine learning approaches

中文摘要英文摘要

蚀变矿物填图是高光谱遥感在地质勘查中的重要应用之一,通过机器学习模型快速准确完成超大数据量高光谱数据的蚀变矿物填图是当前工作难点,本次研究针对监督分类中样本标签可靠性不足及不同模型性能差异不明确的问题,以甘肃柳园地区SASI航空高光谱数据为研究对象,构建了一种基于专家知识的半自动矿物标签生成方法,并在此基础上对多种机器学习模型的分类效果进行对比分析.通过端元提取与标准光谱库匹配获取候选矿物光谱,结合混合调制匹配滤波及地面验证信息对初始填图结果进行修正,形成较为可靠的矿物分布标签.进一步选取支持向量机、随机森林、决策树、梯度提升、AdaBoost、多层感知机及三维卷积神经网络开展分类实验,并采用总体精度、平均精度及 Kappa系数进行评价.结果表明,支持向量机总体表现最优(OA为 96.5%,Kappa为0.956),而AdaBoost性能相对较弱;中铝绢云母在梯度提升模型中识别效果最好,绿帘石在各模型中均存在较明显混淆.3D-CNN总体精度为95.89%,略低于支持向量机,但在类别均衡性方面表现更为稳定.综合分析表明,矿物分类效果在很大程度上受光谱可分性制约,空间信息的引入虽有助于改善类别不均衡,但对整体精度提升不稳定.本研究结果可为高光谱蚀变矿物填图中的样本构建与模型选择提供参考.

Alteration mineral mapping is an important application of hyperspectral remote sensing in geological exploration.Rapid and accurate completion of alteration mapping for ultra large volume hyperspectral datasets using machine learning models currently presents a major technical challenge.This study addresses the issues of insufficient reliability in supervised classification sample labels and unclear performance differences among various models and uses SASI airborne hyperspectral data from the Liuyuan area to develop a semi-automatic mineral labeling approach based on expert knowledge,and conducts a comparative analysis of multiple machine learning methods.Candidate mineral spectra are first derived through endmember extraction and matching with a standard spectral library,and the initial mapping results are further refined using mixture tuned matched filtering in combination with field verification data,yielding a relatively reliable mineral distribution dataset.Based on this dataset,several classifiers,including support vector machine(SVM),Random Forest,Decision Tree,Gradient Boosting,AdaBoost,Multi-layer Perceptron(MLP),and a Three-dimensional Convolutional Neural-network(3D-CNN),are evaluated using overall accuracy(OA),average accuracy(AA),and the Kappa coefficient.The results show that SVM achieves the best overall performance(OA=96.5%,Kappa=0.956),while AdaBoost performs comparatively poorly.Medium-Al muscovite is best identified by the gradient boosting model,whereas epidote exhibits notable confusion across all classifiers.The 3D-CNN achieves an OA of 95.89%,slightly lower than that of SVM,but shows improved class balance as reflected by higher AA.Overall,the results indicate that classification performance is largely governed by spectral separability,while the incorporation of spatial information contributes to improved class balance but does not consistently enhance overall accuracy.These findings provide useful insights for sample construction and model selection in hyperspectral alteration mineral mapping.

杨惠麟;赵英俊;秦凯;郝予希;李明;朱玲;杨越超;李凌昊;王希民

铀资源探采与核遥感全国重点实验室,北京 100029||核工业北京地质研究院,北京 100029铀资源探采与核遥感全国重点实验室,北京 100029||核工业北京地质研究院,北京 100029铀资源探采与核遥感全国重点实验室,北京 100029||核工业北京地质研究院,北京 100029铀资源探采与核遥感全国重点实验室,北京 100029||核工业北京地质研究院,北京 100029铀资源探采与核遥感全国重点实验室,北京 100029||核工业北京地质研究院,北京 100029铀资源探采与核遥感全国重点实验室,北京 100029||核工业北京地质研究院,北京 100029铀资源探采与核遥感全国重点实验室,北京 100029||核工业北京地质研究院,北京 100029铀资源探采与核遥感全国重点实验室,北京 100029||核工业北京地质研究院,北京 100029铀资源探采与核遥感全国重点实验室,北京 100029||核工业北京地质研究院,北京 100029

信息技术与安全科学

蚀变矿物填图SASI影像航空高光谱遥感机器学习3D-CNN网络

alteration mineral mappingSASI dataairborne hyperspectral imagingmachine learning3D convolutional neural network

《世界核地质科学》 2026 (3)

624-636,13

中核集团研发平台稳定支持科研项目(编号:遥YFPT2301)资助 Supported by Stable Support Research Project of CNNC R&D Platforms(No.遥YFPT2301)

10.3969/j.issn.1672-0636.2026.03.018

评论