中澳林产品贸易竞争与互补关系研究OA
Research on competitive and complementary relationship in China-Australia forest products trade
林产品贸易是中澳双边经贸关系中的重要组成部分.文章基于2014-2023年联合国商品贸易统计数据库(UN Comtrade)数据,以木材及木制品(HS44)及其六类细分产品为研究对象,综合运用显性比较优势指数(RCA)、贸易互补性指数(CI)、贸易专业化指数(TSC)、出口相似度指数(ESI)和产业内贸易指数(G-L),系统考察中澳林产品贸易的总体特征、结构演变以及竞争与互补关系.研究发现:(1)中澳林产品贸易规模呈现明显阶段性波动,中国长期以自澳大利亚进口为主,贸易结构具有较强不对称性,且原木等资源型产品对外部冲击更为敏感;(2)中澳林产品贸易在细分产品层面呈现显著的错位分工特征,澳大利亚的比较优势主要集中于原木、锯材等上游资源型产品,中国的比较优势则主要体现在人造板、木地板及其他木制品等中下游加工型产品;(3)中澳林产品出口相似度整体较低,产业内贸易水平有限,双边贸易总体上表现为互补强于竞争,并以产业链上下游衔接为主的垂直分工关系为主要特征;(4)2020年前后检疫限制、非关税壁垒及外部环境变化显著影响了双边贸易规模及部分品类的互补强度,但并未根本改变中澳林产品贸易中"资源供给—加工制造"相分离的基本格局.政策启示:在稳定中澳林产品经贸合作的同时,中国应加快推进木材进口来源多元化、国内资源保障能力提升、林产品加工升级以及绿色贸易规则应对能力建设.
Forest products trade is an important component of China-Australia economic and trade relations.Based on UN Comtrade data from 2014 to 2023,this paper took wood and wood products(HS44)and six subcategories as the research objects,and systematically examined the overall characteristics,structural evolution,and competitive and complementary relationships of China-Australia forest products trade by using the Revealed Comparative Advantage Index(RCA),Trade Complementarity Index(CI),Trade Specialization Coefficient(TSC),Export Similarity Index(ESI),and Grubel-Lloyd Index(G-L).The results showed that:(1)The scale of China-Australia forest products trade experienced obvious phased fluctuations during the sample period,with China maintaining a long-term import-oriented position,and the trade structure showing significant asymmetry.Resource-based products such as logs were more sensitive to external shocks.(2)At the level of subcategories,China and Australia exhibited a clear pattern of dislocated division of labor.Australia's comparative advantages were mainly concentrated in upstream resource-based products such as logs and sawn timber,whereas China's advantages were mainly reflected in midstream and downstream processed products such as wood-based panels,wooden floors,and other wood products.(3)The export similarity between the two countries remained relatively low and the level of intra-industry trade was limited.In general,complementarity was stronger than competition,and bilateral trade was mainly characterized by vertical division of labor based on upstream-downstream industrial linkages.(4)Around 2020,quarantine restrictions,non-tariff barriers and changes in the external environment significantly affected the trade scale and the complementarity of some product categories,but did not fundamentally alter the basic pattern of separation between Australia's resource supply and China's processing and manufacturing.Policy implications:China should further stabilize economic and trade cooperation with Australia,while promoting diversification of timber import sources,improving domestic resource security capacity,upgrading forest products processing,and strengthening its ability to respond to green trade rules.
闫文浩;方宜亮;杨超
南京林业大学经济管理学院 南京 210037北京林业大学经济管理学院 北京 100083北京林业大学经济管理学院 北京 100083
管理科学
中澳贸易木质林产品竞争与互补垂直分工贸易结构
China-Australia tradewood forest productscompetition and complementarityvertical division of labortrade structure
《林业经济》 2026 (2)
62-78,17
国家社会科学基金一般项目"多重委托代理视角下集体公益林治理机制与优化路径研究"(24BJY155).
评论