首页|期刊导航|检验医学与临床|中老年人群肺功能与认知障碍的关联及抑郁症状和日常活动能力在二者中的中介作用

中老年人群肺功能与认知障碍的关联及抑郁症状和日常活动能力在二者中的中介作用OA

Association between pulmonary function and cognitive impairment in middle-aged and elderly populations and the mediating roles of depressive symptoms and activities of daily living

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 探讨中老年人群肺功能与认知障碍发生风险的关联,并评估抑郁症状及日常活动能力的中介作用.方法 选取中国健康与养老追踪调查(CHARLS)2011年收集的数据,纳入的样本量为9 859例,根据是否有认知障碍分为认知障碍组、非认知障碍组.同时,根据呼气峰值流量占预计值百分比(PEF%pred)的四分位数将研究对象分为4组:Q1组(PEF%pred≤58.21%)、Q2组(PEF%pred>58.21%~78.51%)、Q3组(PEF%pred>78.51%~96.48%)、Q4组(PEF%pred>96.48%).比较认知障碍组和非认知障碍组的基线资料.比较不同PEF%pred四分位数组的认知情况.采用多因素Logistic回归模型检验PEF%pred及不同四分位数PEF%pred与认知障碍发生风险之间的关联,并进一步评估不同预设亚组人群中PEF%pred与认知障碍发生风险之间的关系及交互作用.采用限制性立方样条(RCS)回归分析探索PEF%pred与认知障碍发生风险之间是否存在非线性剂量-反应关系.采用Bootstrap法评估抑郁症状、日常活动能力的中介效应.结果 认知障碍组1 476例、非认知障碍组8 383例.认知障碍组PEF%pred明显低于非认知障碍组(P<0.05).Q1、Q2、Q3组各2 465例,Q4组2 464例.Q1组的情景记忆评分、心智状态评分和认知功能总分均显著低于Q2、Q3及Q4组,而认知障碍发生率显著高于其余3组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).PEF%pred升高是发生认知障碍的保护因素(OR=0.992,95%CI:0.990~0.995,P<0.001).与 Q1组相比,Q2、Q3、Q4组发生认知障碍的风险分别降低了17.8%(OR=0.822,95%CI:0.696~0.972,P=0.022)、30.5%(OR=0.695,95%CI:0.582~0.831,P<0.001)、43.3%(OR=0.567,95%CI:0.471~0.683,P<0.001).RCS回归分析发现,PEF%pred与认知障碍发生风险呈线性关联(P总<0.001),无非线性关联(P非线性=0.893).亚组分析结果显示,PEF%pred与认知障碍发生风险的关联在不同年龄、性别、居住地、退休情况、吸烟史、饮酒史、教育程度、做饭或取暖使用固体燃料情况、合并慢性肺病、心脏疾病情况亚组人群中有统计学意义(P<0.05).交互作用分析显示,在不同年龄、居住地、饮酒史、做饭或取暖使用固体燃料情况、BMI亚组存在交互作用(P<0.05).在肺功能与认知功能的关系中,日常活动能力(β=0.034,95%CI:0.023~0.046)及抑郁症状(β=0.039,95%CI:0.026~0.053)起到了显著的中介作用,中介效应占比分别为6.182%、7.091%.日常活动能力和抑郁症状在肺功能与认知功能之间存在链式中介效应(β=0.016,95%CI:0.012~0.021),中介效应占2.909%.结论 随着PEF%pred升高,中老年人认知障碍的发生风险逐渐下降,这种关联存在人群异质性,在中年、居住地为城市、无不良生活习惯、BMI更高的群体中更为显著.维持良好的肺功能可能有助于延缓认知功能下降,其部分机制是通过保持日常活动独立性和减轻抑郁症状实现的.

Objective To investigate the association between lung function and the risk of cognitive impair-ment in middle-aged and older adults,and to assess the mediating effects of depressive symptoms and activities of daily living(ADL).Methods Data were drawn from the 2011 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study(CHARLS),comprising a sample size of 9 859 participants.Participants were classified into a cognitive impairment group and a non-cognitive impairment group.Simultaneously,participants were divided into four groups according to the quartiles of peak expiratory flow as a percentage of the predicted value(PEF%pred):Q1(PEF%pred≤58.21%),Q2(58.21%<PEF%pred≤78.51%),Q3(78.51%<PEF%pred≤96.48%),and Q4(PEF%pred>96.48%).Baseline characteristics were compared between the cognitive im-pairment and non-cognitive impairment groups,while cognitive status was compared across the PEF%pred quartile groups.Multivariate Logistic regression models were used to examine the association of PEF%pred(as a continuous variable and as quartiles)with the risk of cognitive impairment.Subgroup and interaction an-alyses were further performed to evaluate this relationship in predefined subgroups.Restricted cubic spline(RCS)analysis was employed to explore a potential nonlinear dose-response relationship between PEF%pred and the risk of cognitive impairment.The mediating effects of depressive symptoms and ADL were assessed u-sing the bootstrap method.Results A total of 1 476 participants were assigned to the cognitive impairment group and 8 383 to the non-cognitive impairment group.PEF%pred was significantly lower in the cognitive impairment group than that in the non-cognitive impairment group(P<0.05).In each of the Q1,Q2,and Q3 groups,2 465 participants were enrolled,and 2 464 were enrolled in the Q4 group.The scores of episodic mem-ory,mental status and total cognitive function were significantly lower in the Q1 group than those in the Q2,Q3,and Q4 groups,whereas the incidence of cognitive impairment was significantly higher in the Q1 group than that in the other three groups(all P<0.05).Higher PEF%pred was associated with a reduced risk of cognitive impairment(OR=0.992,95%CI:0.990-0.995,P<0.001).Compared with the Q1 group,the risk of cognitive impairment was reduced by 17.8%in the Q2 group(OR=0.822,95%CI:0.696-0.972,P=0.022),by 30.5%in the Q3 group(OR=0.695,95%CI:0.582-0.831,P<0.001),and by 43.3%in the Q4 group(OR=0.567,95%CI:0.471-0.683,P<0.001).In RCS analysis,a linear association was observed be-tween PEF%pred and the risk of cognitive impairment(Ptotal<0.001),and no nonlinear association was de-tected(Pnon-linearity=0.893).Subgroup analyses showed that the association between PEF%pred and the risk of cognitive impairment remained statistically significant in subgroups stratified by age,sex,residence,retire-ment status,smoking history,alcohol consumption,education level,solid fuel use for cooking or heating,chro-nic lung disease and heart disease(all P<0.05).Significant interactions were observed between PEF%pred and age,residence,alcohol consumption,solid fuel use for cooking or heating,and BMI(all P<0.05).The re-lationship between lung function and cognitive function was significantly mediated by ADL(β=0.034,95%CI:0.023-0.046)and depressive symptoms(β=0.039,95%CI:0.026-0.053),with mediation propor-tions of 6.182%and 7.091%respectively.This relationship was also serially mediated by ADL and depressive symptoms(β=0.016,95%CI:0.012-0.021),accounting for 2.909%of the total effect.Conclusion A high-er PEF%pred is associated with a progressively lower risk of cognitive impairment in middle-aged and older adults.This association exhibits population heterogeneity and is more pronounced among individuals who are middle-aged,reside in urban areas,have no unhealthy lifestyle habits,and have a higher BMI.Maintaining opti-mal lung function may help delay cognitive decline,partially mediated by preserving independence in activities of daily living and alleviating depressive symptoms.

杨正婷;邓颖;李一影;卢文婷;闫俊岚;柴琪;蔡云石

四川大学华西医院 全程与共病管理中心,四川 成都 610041四川大学华西医院 全程与共病管理中心,四川 成都 610041四川大学华西医院 全程与共病管理中心,四川 成都 610041四川大学华西医院 全程与共病管理中心,四川 成都 610041四川大学华西医院 全程与共病管理中心,四川 成都 610041四川大学华西医院 全程与共病管理中心,四川 成都 610041四川大学华西医院 肝移植中心,四川 成都 610041

医药卫生

肺功能认知功能日常活动能力抑郁中介效应

lung functioncognitive functionactivities of daily livingdepressionmediating effect

《检验医学与临床》 2026 (12)

1593-1604,12

国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(82303220)国家科技重大专项(2024ZD0523904).

10.3969/j.issn.1672-9455.2026.12.002

评论