从"通俗化"到"新启蒙"OACHSSCD

From"Popularization"to the"New Enlightenment":On Zhao Shuli's Engagement with the Discussion on"National Form"

中文摘要英文摘要

"民族形式"讨论是抗战时期中国共产党为实现"马克思主义中国化"而发起的文化运动,旨在构建现代民族国家的意识形态.赵树理于1941年发表的两篇文章《通俗化"引论"》和《通俗化与"拖住"》批判了"民族形式中心源泉"论,明确提出"通俗化"是"新启蒙"的关键途径,主张通过"普及"与"提高"的辩证统一来实现文艺的"民族形式".赵树理的"通俗化"文艺观为理解"民族形式"讨论与"新启蒙"运动的关系提供了一个"地方性"视角,有助于深化对二者历史关系的理解.

The debate on"national form"was a cultural movement initiated by the Chinese Communist Party during the War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression to achieve the"Sinicization of Marxism",aiming at constructing the ideology of a modern nation-state.In his articles Introduction to Popularization and Popularization and"Holding Back"published in 1941,Zhao Shuli criticized the thesis centered on the"central source"of national form,arguing that popularization was key to achieving the goals of the"new enlightenment".He proposed that this could be realized through the dialectical unity of"popularization"and"elevation".Zhao Shuli's perspective on popularization offers a"local"viewpoint that contributes to a deeper understanding of the historical relationships among"national form",the"new enlightenment"move-ment,and his own literary philosophy.

林培源

广东外语外贸大学 中国语言文化学院,广东 广州 510420

社会科学

赵树理通俗化新启蒙民族形式

Zhao Shulipopularizationnew enlightenmentnational form

《中北大学学报(社会科学版)》 2026 (3)

29-36,8

国家社会科学基金项目:赵树理与革命文艺研究(21CZW051)广东外语外贸大学引进人才科研启动项目(2024RC040)

10.62756/xbsk.1673-1646.2026053

评论