基于实施理论的社区数字化体重管理策略制订:混合演绎与归纳主题分析OA
Developing implementation strategies for a community-based digital weight management program:A hybrid deductive-inductive thematic analysis grounded in implementation theory
目的 以社区为基础的数字化体重管理项目已显示出应对肥胖问题的潜力,但其实施过程中常面临各种障碍.该研究通过识别并评估当前存在的实施障碍与促进因素,进一步制订相应的实施策略.方法 该研究为前瞻性定性研究,在新加坡多个社区减重管理服务机构,选取利益相关者参加工作坊,并对项目采用者和实施者进行单独访谈.采用混合演绎与归纳的主题分析方法,依据实施研究综合框架、理论领域框架以及实施变革专家建议框架进行分析.访谈记录使用编码模板进行定性编码.将识别出的障碍及对应的理论领域映射到实施变革专家建议框架策略中.结果 基于采用者和实施者的访谈记录,分别识别出48个和145个实施障碍,这些障碍分布于理论领域框架的26个子领域和实施研究综合框架的35个子领域.采用者和实施者均一致识别出若干共同障碍,最主要的共性问题是对项目期望的不匹配,包括对"肥胖是一种疾病"认知程度的期望差异、对实施灵活性的期望差异,以及对支持个人动力的期望差异.此外,还识别出43个采用者层面的促进因素和57个实施者层面的促进因素,分布于理论领域框架的25个子领域和实施研究综合框架的28个子领域.常见的促进因素包括提供激励措施、社会认可(舆论支持)以及医生推荐.研究还制订了53个不同的实施变革专家建议子主题.结论 该研究揭示了社区减重管理服务的实施者与采用者在障碍与促进因素方面的潜在关联主题.主题被映射到实施变革专家策略,并借助行动者、行动、行动目标、时相、时机框架进行情境化,以明确具体的行动者与策略.许多策略可由政策制订者和护士付诸实施,凸显了其在促进项目采用与服务提供中的核心作用.
Objectives:Community-based digital weight management programs have shown potential to address the public health concern of obesity,but often face implementation barriers.This study aimed to identify and evaluate current implementation barriers,facilitators,and further develop strategies. Methods:A prospective qualitative study was conducted via workshops of stakeholders from community-based weight loss management services across Singapore,alongside a separate series of interviews for adopters.A hybrid deductive-inductive approach to thematic analysis was then adopted,informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research(CFIR),the Theoretical Domains Framework(TDF),and the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change framework(ERIC).Interview transcripts were qualitatively coded based on relevant CFIR and TDF domains using a coding template.Subsequently,identified barriers and domains were mapped to ERIC strategies. Results:A total of 48 and 145 barriers were identified based on adopter and implementer transcripts,spanning across 26 and 35 subdomains of the TDF and CFIR,respectively.Several barriers were consistently identified by both adopters and implementers,with the main consistency being a mismatch of expectations.These include differing expectations of public awareness on obesity as a disease,expectations on the flexibility of implementations,and expectations on support for personal motivation.Furthermore,43 adopter and 57 implementer facilitators were identified,spanning across 25 and 28 distinct subdomains of the TDF and CFIR framework,with the provision of incentives,societal and doctor endorsements as common facilitators.A total of 53 distinct ERIC implementation strategies subthemes were also identified. Conclusion:The study identified underlying themes linking barriers and facilitators across implemen-ters and adopters of community-based weight management services.These were mapped to ERIC strategies and contextualized using the Action,Actor,Context,Target,Time(AACTT)framework to specify actors and actions.Many of these strategies could be operationalized by policymakers and nurses,highlighting their central role in facilitating program adoption and delivery.
Han Shi Jocelyn Chew;Wen Wei Ang;Xuanming Sherman Tan;Rakhi Vashishtha;Soon Ling Chan;Nick Sevdalis
卫生人员卫生政策实施科学肥胖症患者参与定性研究体重减轻
Health personnelHealth policyImplementation scienceObesityPatient participationQualitative researchWeight loss
《国际护理科学(英文)》 2026 (3)
330-339,10
This study was supported by the NUS-NUHS HPHSR Enabling Grant.The funding body had no role in the design of the study,data collection,analysis,interpretation of data,or in the writing of the manuscript.
评论