首页|期刊导航|地质力学学报|2021年漾濞MS6.4地震序列震源特征及发震构造研究

2021年漾濞MS6.4地震序列震源特征及发震构造研究OA

Study on the source characteristics and seismogenic structure of the 2021 Yangbi MS 6.4 earthquake sequence

中文摘要英文摘要

为明确 2021年云南漾濞 MS 6.4地震序列的发震构造与破裂特征,解决已有研究在孕震断层认识上的争议,文章采用相对质心定位法和震源时频特征法,选取已知机制解的小震作为参考事件,对序列中 10次 MS ≥ 4.0地震开展了破裂方向性参数测定;同时基于近震台站记录,估算了 MS  ≥ 3.0地震能量的辐射效率.结果表明:漾濞地震序列的破裂方向呈现显著的空间分段特征,北西段 5次地震的发震断层均为北西向,南东段 4次地震兼有北西向和北东向.MS  5.6最大前震与 MS  5.2最大余震的破裂方向均指向北东向,且发生在共轭断层上;而MS 6.4主震破裂方向为北西向,与北西段主断层一致,表明南东段共轭断层活动是序列的重要组成部分.MS 4.4前震具有频率依赖的双侧破裂特征,其中相对质心法测得结果为北西向,时频法测得结果为南东向.辐射效率同样存在分段差异,结合区域地质背景,推测该差异由北西段与南东段的断层摩擦性质不同所致.研究结果深化了对该区构造背景和地震孕育过程的认识,可为未来地震危险性评估提供地震学参考.

[Objective]On 21 May 2021,an MS  6.4 earthquake struck Yangbi County,Dali Prefecture,Yunnan Province—the largest event near the Weishan Basin segment of the Weixi-Qiaohou fault since 1976.The mainshock produced no surface rupture and did not occur on any known active fault.Despite numerous previous studies,the precise seismogenic structure and causative faults of this typical foreshock-mainshock-aftershock sequence(including seven MS  ≥ 4.0 foresho-cks and 22 MS≥ 4.0 aftershocks)remain controversial;some results are poorly constrained or even mutually contradictory.Furthermore,the occurrence of moderate-to-strong earthquakes surrounding the source area has increased significantly in recent years.This study thus aims to elucidate the rupture behaviour and seismogenic environment of the entire earthquake sequence.[Methods]Using pre-existing focal mechanism solutions of minor earthquakes as reference events,we adopted the relative centroid relocation method and time-frequency source characterisation method to calculate rupture directivity parameters for ten MS≥ 4.0 events.In addition,we calculated the radiation efficiency for all MS≥ 3.0 earthquakes based on waveform recording from local seismic station.[Results]Our results demonstrate distinct along-strike segmentation of rupture directivity across the Yangbi sequence.On the northwestern segment of the sequence,five earthquakes feature NW-striking fault planes.On the southeastern segment,four earthquakes exhibit faults either NW or NE.The largest foreshock(MS 5.6)and the largest aftershock(MS 5.2)both rupture toward the NE,indicating that they did not occur on the same fault as the MS 6.4 mainshock.Combined with previous relocation and geodetic results,we interpret that these two events occurred on conjugate faults.The MS 6.4 mainshock ruptured toward the NW,consistent with the dominant rupture azimuth of the NW segment,suggesting that the mainshock primarily ruptured the NW-trending master fault,whereas conjugate faulting in the SE segment constitutes an important component of the entire sequence.For the MS 4.4 foreshock,the relative centroid method yields a rupture direction toward the NW,while the time-frequency source method gives a direction toward the SE.This event is therefore interpreted as a frequency-dependent bilateral rupture.We further calculated and corrected the radiation efficiency values for all MS≥ 3.0 events.The efficiency results show a similar along-strike segmentation:the radiation efficiency differs systematically between the NW and SE segments.Integrating rupture directivity patterns,radiation efficiency measurements and regional geological constraints,we infer that the segmentation in rupture directivity is primarily caused by differences in fault frictional properties between the NW and SE segments.[Conclusions]The Yangbi earthquake sequence exhibits distinct segmentation in rupture directivity,with the NW segment dominated by NW-striking master fault rupture and the SE segment characterized by conjugate faulting.The MS 4.4 foreshock corresponds to a frequency-dependent bilateral rupture event.The segmentation in radiation efficiency further supports the interpretation of different fault frictional regimes along the fault strike.[Significance]These findings deliver new constraints on the source characteristics and seismogenic structure of the Yangbi earthquake sequence.They improve our knowledge of the regional tectonic setting and earthquake nucleation cycle,and offer valuable seismological evidence for future seismic hazard assessment across the study area.

周民婷;何骁慧;刘智良;王伟涛

中山大学地球科学与工程学院,广东 珠海 519082||广东省地球动力作用与地质灾害重点实验室,广东 珠海 519082中山大学地球科学与工程学院,广东 珠海 519082||广东省地球动力作用与地质灾害重点实验室,广东 珠海 519082||南方海洋科学与工程广东省实验室(珠海),广东 珠海 519082中山大学地球科学与工程学院,广东 珠海 519082||广东省地球动力作用与地质灾害重点实验室,广东 珠海 519082中国地震局地球物理研究所,北京 100081

天文与地球科学

漾濞MS6.4地震地震序列震源机制发震构造破裂方向性

Yangbi MS 6.4 earthquakeearthquake sequencesource mechanismseismogenic structurerupture directionality

《地质力学学报》 2026 (3)

545-562,18

国家自然科学基金项目(42494913,42474070) This research was financially supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China(Grant Nos.42494913 and 42474070).

10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2025183

评论