首页|期刊导航|中国中西医结合急救杂志|2024年杭州市公众启动除颤计划的实践数据分析

2024年杭州市公众启动除颤计划的实践数据分析OA

Practical data analysis of public access defibrillation in Hangzhou in 2024

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 分析公众启动除颤(PDA)计划的实践效果及影响因素,以推进公共场所自动体外除颤器(AED)的合理配置和科学应用,提升院外心搏骤停(OHCA)救治成功率.方法 以杭州市 2024 年全市经 PDA的 85 例 OHCA 患者为试验组,以全市经 EMS 接诊的 3 598 例 OHCA 患者为对照组.比较试验组与对照组首次心律为可除颤心律的比例及救治成功率,以及试验组经 EMS 完全执行临床路径与未完全执行临床路径患者救治成功率的差异,分析影响因素并制定持续提升计划.结果 试验组与对照组首次心律为可除颤心律比例分别为60.00%(51/85)和12.34%(444/3 598),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).试验组经救治自主循环恢复(ROSC)率和生存出院率均显著高于对照组[ROSC 率:70.59%(36/51)比 26.58%(118/444),生存出院率:47.06%(24/51)比 12.16%(54/444),均 P<0.05].完全执行临床路径组患者 ROSC 率和生存出院率均显著高于未完全执行临床路径组患者[ROSC 率:46.71%(78/167)比 23.19%(16/69),生存出院率:23.35%(39/167)比 11.59%(8/69),均 P<0.05].结论 PDA是 OHCA 救治环节中的重要一环,OHCA 救治成功率的进一步提升既需要公共场所AED 合理配置及科学管理,同时更需要公众、院前、院内密切协作,EMS 规范执行临床路径.

Objective To analyze the real-world effectiveness and influencing factors of public access defibrillation(PAD)to promote the rational configuration and scientific application of automated external defibrillator(AED)in public places and improve the success rate of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest(OHCA).Methods Hangzhou city 85 OHCA patients who received PAD were assigned to the experimental group,while those 3 598 patients treated solely by emergency medical services(EMS)during the same period constituted the control group.Comparisons were performed between the two groups in terms of the proportion of initial defibrillable rhythm and defibrillation success rate.The differences in treatment outcomes between patients with complete implementation of EMS clinical pathway and those with incomplete implementation were also compared.Multivariate analysis was used to explore the relevant influencing factors,and a continuous quality improvement plan was formulated.Results The proportion of shockable initial rhythms of the experimental group and the control group was 60.00%(51/85)and 12.34%(444/3 598)respectively,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The rate of return of spontaneous circulation(ROSC)and the survival and discharge rate of the experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group[ROSC rate:70.59%(36/51)vs.26.58%(118/444),survival and discharge rate:47.06%(24/51)vs.12.16%(54/444),both P<0.05].The ROSC rate and survival discharge rate of the fully executed clinical path group were significantly high than the incomplete clinical path group[ROSC rate:46.71%(78/167)vs.23.19%(16/69),survival to discharge rate:23.35%(39/167)vs.11.59%(8/69),both P<0.05].Conclusions PAD is an important part of OHCA treatment.The further improvement of the success rate of OHCA treatment requires not only the rational allocation and scientific management of AED in public places,but also requires close cooperation between the public,pre-hospital and in-hospital services,as well as,EMS to standardize the implementation of clinical paths.

孙宝云;张军根;付卫林;王建岗;宋因力;鲁美丽;徐琪

浙江省杭州市急救中心急救科,浙江 杭州 310021浙江省杭州市急救中心急救科,浙江 杭州 310021浙江省杭州市急救中心急救科,浙江 杭州 310021浙江省杭州市急救中心急救科,浙江 杭州 310021浙江省杭州市急救中心急救科,浙江 杭州 310021浙江省杭州市急救中心急救科,浙江 杭州 310021浙江省杭州市急救中心急救科,浙江 杭州 310021

院外心搏骤停公众启动除颤临床路径院前院内衔接

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrestPublic access defibrillationClinical pathPre-hospital and in-hospital integration

《中国中西医结合急救杂志》 2026 (2)

223-227,5

浙江省杭州市医药卫生科技项目(20220919Y064) The Medical and Health Science and Technology Project of Hangzhou City,Zhejiang Province(20220919Y064)

10.3969/j.issn.1008-9691.2026.02.016

评论