不同消毒方式对鸽种蛋灭菌及孵化效果的影响OA
Effects of different disinfection methods on sterilization and hatching performance of pigeon hatching eggs
[目的]本试验旨在探究不同消毒方式对鸽种蛋蛋壳表面微生物消灭及孵化效果的影响.[方法]试验设置了5种消毒方式,使用相同孵化机及孵化程序,选取15000枚鸽种蛋,随机分为5组,每组3个重复,每个重复1000枚,入孵前各组分别采用对应方式消毒.具体试验分组为:A组(甲醛+高锰酸钾汽熏)、B组(新洁尔灭溶液浸泡)、C组(新洁尔灭溶液喷洒)、D组(高锰酸钾溶液浸泡)、E组(三氯异氰尿酸烟熏).测定各组鸽种蛋消毒前后蛋壳表面沙门氏菌、大肠杆菌及总菌落数并计算灭菌率,记录无精蛋、死胚、健雏、弱雏、死雏等孵化相关数据.[结果]结果显示,试验未检出沙门氏菌,消毒后各组均无大肠杆菌菌落;总细菌灭菌率方面,B、C组显著高于其他组(P<0.05),A、E组显著高于D组(P<0.05).孵化效果方面,C组死胚率显著最高、受精蛋孵化率显著最低(P<0.05),E组死胚率显著最低(P<0.05),A、E组受精蛋孵化率显著高于其他组(P<0.05).出雏效果方面,C组健雏率显著最低、死雏率显著最高(P<0.05),A、E组健雏率显著最高(P<0.05);B组死雏率显著高于A、D、E组(P<0.05).[结论]综上,B、C组灭菌效果较好,A、E组孵化及出雏效果较好,C组整体效果最差,A组兼顾灭菌效果与孵化效果,综合较优.
[Objective]In order to explore the effects of different disinfection methods on the microorganisms eradication on the eggshell surface and hatching effect of pigeon eggs.[Method]This experiment established five disinfection methods.Using the same incubator and hatching program,15000 pigeon hatching eggs were selected and randomly divided into five groups,with 3 replicates per group and 1,000 eggs per replicate.Each group was disinfected with the corresponding method before incubation.The specific groups were designed as follows:formaldehyde+potassium permanganate fumigation(Group A),bromogeramine solution immersion(Group B),bromogeramine solution spraying(Group C),potassium permanganate solution immersion(Group D),and trichloroisocyanuric acid fumigation(Group E).The surface Salmonella,Escherichia coli(E.coli),and total bacterial counts on the eggshells before and after disinfection were measured,and the sterilization rates were calculated.Hatching-related parameters including infertile eggs,dead embryos,healthy squabs,weak squabs and dead squabs were recorded.[Result]The results showed that Salmonella was not detected in the experiment,and no E.coli colonies were found in all groups after disinfection.For total bacterial sterilization rate,Group B and C were significantly greater than the other groups(P<0.05),and Group A and E were significantly greater than Group D(P<0.05).In terms of hatching performance,Group C had the significantly highest dead embryo rate and the significantly lowest hatching rate of fertile eggs(P<0.05),while Group E had the significantly lowest dead embryo rate(P<0.05).The hatching rates of fertile eggs in Group A and E were significantly greater than those other groups C and D(P<0.05).For chick performance,Group C had the significantly lowest healthy chick rate and the significantly highest dead chick rate(P<0.05),whereas Group A and E had the significantly highest healthy chick rate(P<0.05).The dead chick rate of Group B was significantly greater than that of Group A,D and E(P<0.05).[Conclusion]In conclusion,Group B and C showed better sterilization effects,while Group A and E exhibited better hatching and chick performance.Group C presented the poorest overall effect.Group A achieved a balance between sterilization efficiency and hatching performance,representing the optimal comprehensive treatment.
陈铭;洪谱飞;韩远豪;杨宏秋;常楷悦;伍仲平;陈益填;梁雅妍;张续勐;林随源;侯晓韵;陈伟锋;郭诗琦;詹胤锴;谢泽婷;徐昊泽
揭阳市揭东区动物卫生监督所,广东 揭阳 522000仲恺农业工程学院动物科技学院,广东 广州 510225仲恺农业工程学院动物科技学院,广东 广州 510225南昌洪州农业科技有限公司,江西 南昌 330000梅州金绿现代农业发展有限公司,广东 梅州 514000仲恺农业工程学院动物科技学院,广东 广州 510225仲恺农业工程学院动物科技学院,广东 广州 510225仲恺农业工程学院动物科技学院,广东 广州 510225仲恺农业工程学院动物科技学院,广东 广州 510225仲恺农业工程学院动物科技学院,广东 广州 510225仲恺农业工程学院动物科技学院,广东 广州 510225仲恺农业工程学院动物科技学院,广东 广州 510225仲恺农业工程学院动物科技学院,广东 广州 510225仲恺农业工程学院动物科技学院,广东 广州 510225仲恺农业工程学院动物科技学院,广东 广州 510225仲恺农业工程学院动物科技学院,广东 广州 510225
农业科技
消毒方式鸽种蛋灭菌率孵化效果
Disinfection methodPigeon hatching eggsSterilization rateHatching performance
《中国畜禽种业》 2026 (5)
79-87,9
2025年度广东省级乡村振兴战略专项资金种业振兴项目(2025-XPY-08-001)2024年度中央引导地方科技发展资金(2024B0202010014)广东省普通高校重点领域项目(2024ZDZX4013)2024年度广东省级乡村振兴战略专项资金种业振兴项目(2024-XPY-00-012)广东省现代农业家禽产业技术体系创新团队(2024CXTD20)2026年大学生创新基金项目(2026CX24).
评论