低频脉冲电刺激联合感觉统合训练在运动发育迟缓患儿中的应用效果OA
Application effect of low-frequency pulsed electrical stimulation combined with sensory integration training in children with motor developmental delay
目的 探究低频脉冲电刺激联合感觉统合训练在运动发育迟缓患儿中的应用效果.方法 选取2023年5月—2025年5月邯郸市妇幼保健院接收的88例运动发育迟缓患儿,按信封抽签法随机分为电刺激组和联合组,每组44例.电刺激组给予低频脉冲电刺激,联合组给予低频脉冲电刺激联合感觉统合训练.比较两组治疗疗效、运动功能、发育情况、10 m步行测试(10MWT)、阶梯试验(TST)时间及不良事件.结果 联合组的治疗总有效率高于电刺激组(P<0.05);联合组治疗后的Peabody运动发育量表(PDMS)评分高于电刺激组(P<0.05);联合组治疗前后PDMS评分的差值均大于电刺激组(P<0.05).联合组治疗后格里菲斯发育评估量表(GDS)评分高于电刺激组(P<0.05);联合组治疗前后GDS评分的差值均大于电刺激组(P<0.05).联合组治疗后的10MWT、TST时间均低于电刺激组(P<0.05);联合组治疗前后10MWT、TST时间的差值均大于电刺激组(P<0.05).两组不良事件发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 低频脉冲电刺激联合感觉统合训练在运动发育迟缓患儿中的应用效果较好.
Objective To investigate the application effect of low-frequency pulsed electrical stimulation combined with sensory integration training in children with motor developmental delay.Methods A total of 88 children with motor developmental delay admitted to our hospital from May 2023 to May 2025 were enrolled and randomly divided into an electrical stimulation group(n=44)and a combined group(n=44)using the envelope randomization method.The electrical stimulation group received low-frequency pulsed electrical stimulation,while the combined group received low-frequency pulsed electrical stimulation combined with sensory integration training.Therapeutic efficacy,motor function,developmental status,10-meter walk test(10MWT),timed stair test(TST),and adverse events were compared between the two groups.Results The total effective rate in the combined group was significantly higher than that in the electrical stimulation group(P<0.05).After treatment,the Peabody developmental motor scales(PDMS)score in the combined group was higher than that in the electrical stimulation group(P<0.05),and the pre-to-post-treatment improvement in PDMS score was greater in the combined group than in the electrical stimulation group(P<0.05).After treatment,the griffiths developmental assessment scales(GDS)score in the combined group was higher than that in the electrical stimulation group(P<0.05),and the difference in GDS score before and after treatment in the combined group was greater than that in the electrical stimulation group(P<0.05).After treatment,the 10MWT and TST times in the combined group were lower than those in the electrical stimulation group(P<0.05),and the differences in 10MWT and TST times before and after treatment in the combined group were greater than those in the electrical stimulation group(P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Low-frequency pulsed electrical stimulation combined with sensory integration training shows favorable application effects in children with motor developmental delay.
赵晓惠;姜燕;李利英;王甜;张明;李军勤
邯郸市妇幼保健院 儿科,河北 邯郸 056001邯郸市妇幼保健院 药剂科,河北 邯郸 056001邯郸市妇幼保健院 儿科,河北 邯郸 056001邯郸市妇幼保健院 儿童健康管理中心,河北 邯郸 056001邯郸市妇幼保健院 儿童康复科,河北 邯郸 056001邯郸市妇幼保健院 儿科,河北 邯郸 056001
医药卫生
运动发育迟缓低频脉冲电刺激感觉统合训练运动功能发育情况
motor developmental delaylow-frequency pulsed electrical stimulationsensory integration trainingmotor functiondevelopmental status
《中国现代医学杂志》 2026 (11)
109-114,6
河北省卫生健康委员会医学科学研究项目(20251314)
评论